设为首页
加入收藏
Non-precipitation Identification Technique for CINRAD/SAD Dual Polarimetric Weather Radar
-
摘要: 双偏振雷达观测特征参量（如相关系数、差分反射率等）能有效抑制地物、超折射、电磁干扰、海浪和晴空等非降水回波。在上海南汇WSR-88D双偏振雷达非降水回波识别算法基础上，对我国升级布网且纳入业务运行的CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达数据进行算法测试、算法模块适应性改进，利用江苏、广东的双偏振雷达观测冰雹、融化层、台风降水及各种杂波个例进行算法检验评估，并在组网拼图中展示质量控制效果。结果表明：总体上算法对非降水回波的识别准确率达到95.2%，降水回波的误判率为2.6%。但对夏秋季节夜晚的大面积晴空回波算法识别准确率低于90%，有待尝试利用深度学习方法改进。Abstract: In China, the operational upgrade of dual polarimetric weather radar is being promoted. CINRAD/SAD dual polarimetric weather radar in some provinces such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong and Zhejiang has been upgraded in operation. By June of 2021, there are 69 dual polarimetric weather radars in national radar network, and it will increase to more than 100 in the future. The dual polarimetric radar is an important detection equipment for studying the microphysical process of precipitation, which can provide multiple polarizations including raindrop spectrum information, and thus better describe the microphysical characteristics of precipitation. The technical upgrade will bring revolutionary changes for data quality control, hydrogel classification and quantitative precipitation estimation. With the measurement parameters such as correlation coefficient or differential reflectivity, the dual-polarimetric weather radar can effectively remove non-precipitation echoes such as ground clutter, anomalous propagation, electromagnetic interference, sea waves, clear air clutter and so on. Based on the non-precipitation identification technique on S-band WSR-88D dual polarization weather radar, the distribution characteristics of correlation coefficient and differential reflectivity in precipitation echo and clutter are analyzed. The CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar data are used to test and improve the algorithm to adapt domestic weather radar, the differential reflectivity texture feature is added in the improved algorithm and the distribution characteristics of differential reflectivity horizontal texture on precipitation echo and clutter are analyzed, to better remove non-precipitation echo. During the evaluation of algorithm, several cases such as hail, melting layer, typhoon and different types of clutters during May-October in 2019 and 2020 are investigated. The results show that the improved algorithm can identify 95.2% of non-precipitation echoes, and the error rate of precipitation is 2.6%. For the large area clear air clutter, after adding the differential reflectivity texture feature, combining with the correlation coefficient texture feature, the accuracy of the algorithm is improved from 68.6% to 96.8% for one case, but the overall accuracy is less than 90% for many cases, and it needs to be improved by deep learning method in the future. Non-precipitation identification algorithm on CINRAD/SAD is applied in mosaic image, showing great application prospect in the future for precipitation classification and quantitative precipitation estimation. It can provide high quality data and play an important role in real-time operation.
-
图 1 降水回波与非降水回波的相关系数和差分反射率
(a)降水回波相关系数，(b)非降水回波相关系数，(c)降水回波差分反射率，(d)非降水回波差分反射率
Fig. 1 Correlation coefficient and differential reflectivity for precipitation echo and clutter
(a)correlation coefficient of precipitation, (b)correlation coefficient of non-precipitation, (c)differential reflectivity of precipitation, (d)differential reflectivity of non-precipitation
图 2 2019年9月3日01:30:19徐州CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测特征参量
(相邻距离圈间隔50 km，下同)
Fig. 2 Parameters observed by CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric radar of Xuzhou at 013019 BT 3 Sep 2019
(distance of adjacent circles is 50 km, the same hereinafter)
图 4 降水回波与非降水回波的相关系数和差分反射率的水平纹理特征
(a)降水回波相关系数纹理，(b)非降水回波相关系数纹理，(c)降水回波差分反射率纹理，(d)非降水回波差分反射率纹理
Fig. 4 Texture features of correlation coefficient and differential reflectivity for precipitation and non-precipitation
(a)correlation coefficient texture of precipitation, (b)correlation coefficient texture of non-precipitation, (c)differential reflectivity texture of precipitation, (d)differential reflectivity texture of non-precipitation
图 5 CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测非降水回波识别算法流程
Fig. 5 Flow chart of non-precipitation identification algorithm on CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar
图 6 质量控制前后大面积晴空回波
Fig. 6 Reflectivity factor of large clear air before and after radar quality control
图 7 2019年8月1日13:35徐州CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测冰雹及融化层质量控制前后的反射率因子
Fig. 7 Reflectivity factor of hailstorm and melting layer before and after radar quality control observed by CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar of Xuzhou at 1335 BT 1 Aug 2019
图 8 2019年8月11日00:05盐城CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测台风降水质量控制前后的反射率因子
Fig. 8 Reflectivity factor of typhoon precipitation before and after radar quality control observed by CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar of Yancheng at 0005 BT 11 Aug 2019
图 9 2019年7月30日23:03盐城CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测地物、超折射、干扰杂波质量控制前后的反射率因子
Fig. 9 Reflectivity factor of ground clutter, anomalous propagation and electromagnetic interference process before and after radar quality control observed by CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar of Yancheng at 2303 BT 30 Jul 2019
图 10 2019年9月2日03:36徐州CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达观测降水与大面积晴空混杂回波质量控制前后的反射率因子
Fig. 10 Reflectivity factor of precipitation and large clear air process before and after radar quality control algorithm observed by CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radar of Xuzhou at 0336 BT 2 Sep 2019
图 11 2020年6月12日14:00江苏高邮龙卷过程6部CINRAD/SAD双偏振雷达组网拼图
Fig. 11 Mosaic image of Gaoyou Tornado before and after quality control observed by six CINRAD/SAD dual-polarimetric weather radars at 1400 BT 12 Jun 2020
表 1 多种个例质量控制客观评估表
Table 1 Quality control algorithm evaluation of cases
种类 非降水回波识别准确率/% 降水回波误判率/% 冰雹、融化层 96.5 1.2 台风降水 1.8 电磁干扰、小面积晴空 99.2 地物、超折射、电磁干扰 95.7 2.2 大面积晴空 90.9 2.0 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 李柏, 古庆同, 李瑞义, 等.新一代天气雷达灾害性天气监测能力分析及未来发展.气象, 2013, 39(3):265-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201303002.htmLi B, Gu Q T, Li R Y, et al. Analysis on disastrous weather monitoring capability of CINRAD and future development. Meteor Month, 2013, 39(2): 266-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201303002.htm [2] 张曦, 黄兴友, 刘新安, 等. 北京大兴国际机场相控阵雷达强对流天气监测. 应用气象学报, 2022, 33(2): 192-204. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220206Zhang X, Huang X Y, Liu X A, et al. The hazardous convective storm monitoring of phased-array antenna radar at Daxing International Airport of Beijing. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 192-204. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220206 [3] Bao X W, Wu D, Lei X T, et al. Improving the extreme rainfall forecast of Typhoon Morakot(2009) by assimilating radar data from Taiwan Island and mainland China. J Meteor Res, 2017, 31(4): 747-766. doi: 10.1007/s13351-017-6007-8 [4] 朱立娟, 龚建东, 黄丽萍, 等. GRAPES三维云初始场形成及在短临预报中的应用. 应用气象学报, 2017, 28(1): 38-51. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20170104Zhu L J, Gong J D, Huang L P, et al. Three-dimensional cloud initial field created and applied to GRAPES numerical weather prediction nowcasting. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2017, 28(1): 38-51. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20170104 [5] 盛春岩, 薛德强, 雷霆, 等. 雷达资料同化与提高模式水平分辨率对短时预报影响的数值对比试验. 气象学报, 2006, 64(3): 293-307. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2006.03.004Sheng C Y, Xue D Q, Lei T, et al. Comparative experiments between effects of Doppler radar data assimilation and increasing horizontal resolution on short-range prediction. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2006, 64(3): 293-307. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2006.03.004 [6] 肖艳姣, 刘黎平, 杨洪平. 基于天气雷达网三维拼图的混合反射率因子生成技术. 气象学报, 2008, 66(3): 470-473. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2008.03.016Xiao Y J, Liu L P, Yang H P. Technique for generating hybrid reflectivity field based on 3-D mosaic reflectivity of weather radar network. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2008, 66(3): 470-473. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2008.03.016 [7] 江源, 刘黎平, 庄薇. 多普勒天气雷达地物回波特征及其识别方法改进. 应用气象学报, 2009, 20(2): 204-212. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/20090210Jiang Y, Liu L P, Zhuang W. Statistical characteristics of clutter and improvements of ground clutter identification technique with Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(2): 204-212. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/20090210 [8] 文浩, 张乐坚, 梁海河, 等. 基于模糊逻辑的新一代天气雷达径向干扰回波识别算法. 气象学报, 2020, 78(1): 116-127.Wen H, Zhang L J, Liang H H, et al. Radial interference echo identification algorithm based on fuzzy logic for weather radar. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2020, 78(1): 116-127. [9] 李丰, 刘黎平, 王红艳, 等. S波段多普勒天气雷达非降水气象回波识别. 应用气象学报, 2012, 23(2): 147-158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2012.02.003Li F, Liu L P, Wang H Y, et al. Identification of non-precipitation meteorological echoes with Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2012, 23(2): 147-158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2012.02.003 [10] 李丰, 刘黎平, 王红艳, 等. C波段多普勒天气雷达地物识别方法. 应用气象学报, 2014, 25(2): 158-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2014.02.005Li F, Liu L P, Wang H Y, et al. Identification of ground clutter with C-band Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2014, 25(2): 158-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2014.02.005 [11] 谭学, 刘黎平, 范思睿. 新一代天气雷达海浪回波特征分析和识别方法研究. 气象学报, 2013, 71(5): 962-975. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201305015.htmTan X, Liu L P, Fan S R. Statistical characteristics of sea clutter and its identification with the CINRAD. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2013, 71(5): 962-975. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201305015.htm [12] 肖艳姣, 万玉发, 王珏, 等. 一种自动多普勒雷达速度退模糊算法研究. 高原气象, 2012, 31(4): 1119-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201204028.htmXiao Y J, Wan Y F, Wang J, et al. Study of an automated Doppler radar velocity dealiasing algorithm. Plateau Meteor, 2012, 31(4): 1119-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201204028.htm [13] 杨川, 刘黎平, 胡志群, 等. C波段多普勒雷达双PRF模式速度混淆区识别和处理方法研究. 气象学报, 2013, 70(4): 875-886. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201204026.htmYang C, Liu L P, Hu Z Q, et al. An algorithm for chaoes radial velocity identifying and processing in C-band Doppler radars running in the dual PRF Mode. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2013, 70(4): 875-886. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201204026.htm [14] 徐舒扬, 吴翀, 刘黎平. 双偏振雷达水凝物相态识别算法的参数改进. 应用气象学报, 2020, 31(3): 350-360. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200309Xu S Y, Wu C, Liu L P. Parameter improvements of hydrometeor classification algorithm for the dual-polarimetric radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(3): 350-360. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200309 [15] 王洪, 孔凡铀, Jung Youngsun, 等. 面向资料同化的S波段双偏振雷达质量控制. 应用气象学报, 2018, 29(5): 546-558. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20180504Wang H, Kong F Y, Jung Y, et al. Quality control of S-band polarimetric radar measurements for data assimilation. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(5): 546-558. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20180504 [16] 吴翀, 刘黎平, 仰美霖, 等. X波段双偏振雷达相态识别与拼图的关键技术. 应用气象学报, 2021, 32(2): 200-216. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210206Wu C, Liu L P, Yang M L, et al. Key technologies of hydrometeor classification and mosaic algorithm for X-band polarimetric radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(2): 200-216. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210206 [17] 刘黎平, 吴林林, 杨引明. 基于模糊逻辑的分步式超折射地物回波识别方法的建立和效果分析. 气象学报, 2007, 65(2): 252-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200702010.htmLiu L P, Wu L L, Yang Y M. Development of fuzzy-logical two-step ground clutter detection algorithm. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2007, 65(2): 252-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200702010.htm [18] 文浩, 刘黎平, 张扬. 多普勒天气雷达地物回波识别算法改进. 高原气象, 2017, 36(3): 763-749. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201703014.htmWen H, Liu L P, Zhang Y. Improvements of ground clutter identification algorithm for Doppler weather radar. Plateau Meteor, 2017, 36(3): 763-749. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201703014.htm [19] 冷亮, 黄兴友, 杨洪平, 等. 多普勒雷达晴空回波识别与应用. 气象科技, 2012, 40(4): 535-540. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ201204005.htmLeng L, Huang X Y, Yang H P, et al. Recognition and application of Doppler weather radar clear air echoes. Meteor Sci Technol, 2012, 40(4): 535-540. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ201204005.htm [20] Zhang G F. 双偏振雷达气象学. 闵锦忠, 戚友存, 王世璋, 等译. 北京: 气象出版社, 2018.Zhang G F. Weather Radar Polarimetry. Translated by Min J Z, Qi Y C, Wang S Z, et al. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2018. [21] 管理, 戴建华, 陶岚, 等. QVP方法在双偏振雷达冬季降水观测中的应用. 应用气象学报, 2021, 32(1): 91-101. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210108Guan L, Dai J H, Tao L, et al. Application of QVP method to winter precipitation observation based on polarimetric radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(1): 91-101. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210108 [22] Brandes E A, Zhang G, Vivekanandan J. Experiments in rainfall estimation with a polarimetric radar in subtropical environment. J Appl Meteor, 2002, 41: 674-685. [23] Matrosov S Y, Clark K A, Martner B E, et al. X-band polarimetric radar measurements of rainfall. J Appl Meteor, 2002, 41: 941-952. [24] Ryzhkov A V, Giangrande S E, Schuur T J. Rainfall estimation with a polarimetric prototype of WSR-88D. J Appl Meteor, 2005, 44: 502-515. [25] Tang L, Zhang J, Langston C, et al. A physically based precipitation-nonprecipitation radar classifier using polarimetric and environmental data in a real-time national system. Wea Forecasting, 2014, 29: 1106-1119. [26] Park H S, Ryzhkov A V, Zrnic D S, et al. The hydrometeor classification algorithm for the polarimetric WSR-88D: Description and application to an MCS. Wea Forecasting, 2009, 24: 730-748. [27] Snyer J C, Bluestein H B, Zhang G, et al. Attenuation correction and hydrometeor classification of high-resolution, X-band, dual-polarized mobile radar measurements in severe convective storms. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2010, 27: 1979-2001. [28] Mahale V N, Zhang G, Xue M. Fuzzy logic classification of S-band polarimetric radar echoes to identify three-body scattering and improve data quality. J Appl Meteor Climatol, 2014, 53: 2017-2033. [29] Bukovcic P, Zrnic D, Zhang G. Convective-stratiform separation using video disdrometer observations in central Oklahoma-the Bayesian approach. Atmos Res, 2015, 155(15): 176-191. [30] Jiang Y, Xu Q, Zhang P F, et al. Using WSR-88D polarimetric data to identify bird-contaminated Doppler velocities. Adv Meteor, 2013, 1: 1-13. [31] 朱轶明, 马舒庆, 杨玲, 等. 上海南汇WSR-88D双偏振天气雷达的生物回波识别与分析. 气象与环境科学, 2019, 42(3): 120-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNQX201903016.htmZhu Y M, Ma S Q, Yang L, et al. Recognition and analysis of biological echo using WSR-88D dual-polarization weather radar in Nanhui of Shanghai. Meteor Environ Sci, 2019, 42(3): 120-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNQX201903016.htm [32] 张林, 杨洪平. S波段WSR-88D双偏振雷达观测非降水回波识别方法研究. 气象, 2018, 44(5): 666-670. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201805007.htmZhang L, Yang H P. Non-precipitation identification technique on S-band WSR-88D polarization weather radar. Meteor Month, 2018, 44(5): 666-670. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201805007.htm [33] 张林, 杨洪平, 裴翀, 等. 相邻雷达回波差异检测方法研究与应用. 气象, 2018, 44(2): 268-276. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201802006.htmZhang L, Yang H P, Pei C, et al. Analysis and application of the test method of reflectivity difference between adjacent radars. Meteor Month, 2018, 44(2): 268-276. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201802006.htm -
点击查看大图
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 664
- HTML全文浏览量: 187
- PDF下载量: 104
- 被引次数: 0
