A Comparative Evaluation on Automatic and Manual Observations of Fog and Haze in Tianjin
-
摘要: 为适应地面气象观测业务调整方向,提高新型自动气象站观测资料的质量及可用性,研究中对天津地区10个地面气象站1951—2014年历年2月人工观测及2014年2月自动观测和人工观测的轻雾、雾、霾现象进行对比评估。结果表明:天津地区历年2月轻雾的平均日数为10 d,雾和霾均为2 d,轻雾和霾同期出现的日数占有天气现象的7.4%,而雾和霾同期出现日数仅占0.7%;平行观测期的对比分析得到人工观测轻雾日数比自动观测多11 d,雾日数和霾日数均比自动观测少6 d,其中,轻雾和雾的判别差异集中出现在每日08:00(北京时,下同),霾则基本出现在每日08:00,14:00,17:00,20:00;通过对比自动观测和人工观测的能见度数据发现,二者相对偏差达25.1%,能见度小于15.0 km时,自动观测的能见度有60%~76%数值偏小,特别是08:00和20:00, 因此,在相对湿度满足条件的情况下,能见度的判别误差是导致自动观测与人工观测轻雾、雾、霾现象判别差异的重要原因。Abstract: Based on the past records by manual observation at ten meteorological stations during 1951-2014 and parallel observations by automatic and manual observations in February 2014, discrepancies of mist, fog and haze phenomena are evaluated in Tianjin, in order to meet the reform direction of surface meteorological observation business, and to improve the quality and availability of data observed by new automatic system. Results indicate that in February, the mean number of mist days in Tianjin is 10, while numbers for fog or haze days are both 2. The proportion for mist accompanying haze days occupies 7.4% in all the weather phenomena, but for fog and haze days, it is only 0.7%. There is an increasing trend in mist days, but not for fog, and since 1990s, haze days have begun to increase obviously, especially for the year of 2007 during the last 60 years. Comparative analysis in parallel period by manual indicates there are 11 more mist days but 6 less fog and haze days than those by automation. Discrepancies of mist and fog phenomena arise at 0800 BT, manual observation captures more mist but automatic observation records more fog. Discrepancies of haze phenomenon arise at 0800, 1400, 1700 BT and 2000 BT, which are observed by manual way, but none according to automatic observations, while the phenomena of haze or mist and haze are totally the opposite. However, characteristics of phenomena judged by automatic and manual observations are of the same, i.e., mist days are the most, haze days are the second, fog days are the least, and the number of mist accompanying haze days is more than that for fog accompanying haze. Comparing visibility values by manual observation with automation indicates that the average relative error between them is 25.1% in all the samples, 54.5% of automatic observation is less than manual observation, 28.5% out of these the difference exceeding 1 km, manual observation meets with automatic observation only for 6.5% of all cases. For differences of visibility in different order of magnitude, 60%-76% of automatic observation is smaller, when the visibility is less than 15.0 km, especially for 0800 BT and 2000 BT. The median of relative error within the threshold ranges of [1.0 km, 5.0 km) and [5.0 km, 10.0 km), judging the phenomenon of mist and haze, are both about 22%, and larger range of [10.0 km, 15.0 km) and [15.0 km, +∞) are only about 15%. Accordingly, observation error of visibility is an important cause leading to discrepancies of mist, fog and haze phenomena by automatic and manual observations, in the case of relative humidity to meet suitable conditions.
-
表 1 天津地区视程障碍现象的判别标准
Table 1 Discriminant conditions of visibility restricting phenomenon in Tianjin
天气现象 影响能见度的程度/km 相对湿度条件/% 自动观测 人工观测 自动观测 人工观测 轻雾 [0.75,7.5) [1.0,10.0) (60,100] [60,100) 雾 [0,0.75) [0,1.0) (60,100] [90,100) 霾 [0,7.5) [0,10.0) (0,60] [0,60) 注:自动观测雾,相对湿度阈值由于受仪器参数设置限制 (只能设置1个值),业务工作中将轻雾、雾、霾现象采用统一的阈值标准60%;人工观测和自动观测雾的相对湿度标准不同:人工观测雾,相对湿度阈值根据《地面气象观测规范》规定,结合天津地区观测员历史观测经验采用90%。 表 2 2014年2月自动观测和人工观测的轻雾、雾、霾日数统计 (单位:d)
Table 2 Numbers of mist, fog and haze days by automatic and manual observations in Feb 2014(unit:d)
视程障碍现象 自动观测 人工观测 二者差值 轻雾 188 199 11 雾 25 19 -6 霾 130 124 -6 表 3 不同范围自动观测与人工观测能见度的相对偏差统计 (单位:%)
Table 3 Relative errors for different ranges of visibility between automatic and manual observations (unit:%)
时次 能见度范围/km [0, 1.0) [1.0 km, 5.0) [5.0, 10.0) [10.0, 15.0) [15.0, +∞) 08:00 24.7 30.6 25.9 16.3 20.0 11:00 47.2 55.9 30.0 21.7 22.8 14:00 21.5 25.0 24.5 19.8 17:00 24.1 32.7 22.6 26.1 20:00 33.6 26.5 24.2 18.7 22.1 表 4 自动观测与人工观测的能见度偏差统计 (单位:%)
Table 4 Deviations of visibility by automatic and manual observations (unit:%)
统计对象 能见度范围/km 观测时次 [0,1.0) [1.0,5.0) [5.0,10.0) [10.0,15.0) [15.0,+∞) 08:00 11:00 14:00 17:00 20:00 负偏差比例 72.2 65.0 76.0 60.3 26.3 60.6 45.2 51.6 41.9 57.7 偏低1.0 km
以上比例0.0 19.8 48.9 48.3 20.4 31.6 23.7 23.5 20.4 34.2 相等比例 16.7 3.5 0.9 0.9 14.6 4.5 6.5 8.4 5.4 6.8 -
[1] 白洋, 刘晓源.“雾霾”成因的深层法律思考及防治对策.中国地质大学学报:社会科学版, 2013, 3(6):27-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDXS201306004.htm [2] 郑祚芳.城市化对北京霾日数影响统计方法.生态环境学报, 2013, 22(8):1381-1385. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ201308018.htm [3] 高岑, 王体健, 吴建军, 等.2009年秋季南京地区一次持续性灰霾天气过程研究.气象科学, 2012, 32(3):246-252. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKX201203001.htm [4] 吴兑.近十年中国灰霾天气研究综述.环境科学学报, 2012, 32(2):257-269. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXX201202005.htm [5] 廖国莲, 曾鹏, 郑凤琴, 等.1960—2009年广西霾日时空变化特征.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(6):732-739. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20110611 [6] 黄健, 吴兑, 黄敏辉, 等.1954—2004年珠江三角洲大气能见度变化趋势.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(1):61-70. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20080111 [7] 范跃, 赵晓莉, 王英, 等.自动与人工观测风速和风向的差异分析.气象, 2011, 37(4):490-496. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2011.04.014 [8] 鞠晓慧, 任芝花, 曹丽娟, 等.自动与人工观测气压的差异及原因分析.气象, 2010, 36(1):104-110. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2010.01.016 [9] 宋军, 高磊, 王秀萍, 等.大连自动站与人工站观测数据的差异对比分析.气象与环境学报, 2009, 25(1):58-62. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNQX200901013.htm [10] 刘小宁, 任芝花, 王颖.自动观测与人工观测地面温度的差异及其分析.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(5):554-563. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20080506 [11] 沈艳, 任芝花.我国自动与人工蒸发量观测资料的对比分析.应用气象学报, 2008, 18(4):463-469. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20080410 [12] 任芝花, 冯明农, 张洪政, 等.自动与人工观测降雨量的差异及相关性.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3):358-364. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070358&flag=1 [13] 王颖, 刘小宁, 鞠晓慧.自动观测与人工观测差异的初步分析.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(6):849-855. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.200706128 [14] 连志鸾.自动站与人工站观测记录的差异分析.气象, 2005, 31(3):48-52. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2005.03.011 [15] 周春珍. 山东省自动观测与人工观测数据差异分析. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2009. [16] 熊安元, 朱燕君, 任芝花, 等.观测仪器和百叶箱的变化对地面气象观测值的影响极其原因分析.气象学报, 2006, 64(3):377-384. doi: 10.11676/qxxb2006.036 [17] 胡玉峰.自动与人工观测数据的差异.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(6):719-726. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040689&flag=1 [18] 中国气象局.地面气象观测规范.北京:气象出版社2003:21-27. [19] 王光里.公路能见度概念及测量仪器的计量校准原理与方法探讨.吉林交通科技, 2010(3):9-12. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLJT201003004.htm [20] 李惠彬.对能见度、光学视程和跑道视程的理解.空中交通管理, 2001(1):34-36. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KZJT200101017.htm [21] 中国气象局综合观测司. 前向散射能见度仪观测规范 (试行). 2011: 3.