留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

CO2湍流通量误差的修正和不确定性研究进展

汪瑛 卞林根 谌志刚

汪瑛, 卞林根, 谌志刚. CO2湍流通量误差的修正和不确定性研究进展. 应用气象学报, 2004, 15(2): 234-244..
引用本文: 汪瑛, 卞林根, 谌志刚. CO2湍流通量误差的修正和不确定性研究进展. 应用气象学报, 2004, 15(2): 234-244.
Wang Ying, Bian Lingen, Chen Zhigang. Correction of errors and uncertainty in the measurements of CO2 turbulent flux. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2004, 15(2): 234-244.
Citation: Wang Ying, Bian Lingen, Chen Zhigang. Correction of errors and uncertainty in the measurements of CO2 turbulent flux. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2004, 15(2): 234-244.

CO2湍流通量误差的修正和不确定性研究进展

资助项目: 

中国气象局气候专项项目 

CORRECTION OF ERRORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN THE MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 TURBULENT FLUX

  • 摘要: 目前国内外对能量和CO2涡动相关通量的测量误差的谱修正缺乏一致性,导致各测量站之间的资料对比难以进行,给全球尺度资料的合成造成很大困难。因此在强调长期CO2通量测量精度的同时,还应该注重确定对测量误差修正的首选方法和研究重点。该文主要介绍了两种用于修正测量仪器误差的谱方法;二维和三维的气流运动对通量误差的影响;资料处理中的误差;夜间CO2通量的测量问题。
  • 图  1  2000年1月两天的比和垂直压力通量的时间序列(引自Leuning,R,1992) [3]

    图  2  一阶滤波器和线性滤波器的位相比较[3]

    图  3  夜间观测的CO2 通量与摩擦速度(u*)的相关性[3]

    图  4  储量修正的CO2 通量与摩擦速度的关系[3]

  • [1] Wofsy S C, Hollinger D Y for the AmeriFlux science team. Scientific Plan for AmeriFlux: US Long-Term Flux Measurement Network, 1998.
    [2] Leuning R, King K M .Comparison of eddy-covariance measurement s of CO2 fluxes by open-and closed-path CO2 analysers .Boundary-Layer Meteorology , 1992 , 59 :297~311 . doi:  10.1007/BF00119818
    [3] Massman W J, Lee X. Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 121~144. doi:  10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00105-3
    [4] Kaimal J C, Clifford S F, Lataitis R J. Effect of finite sampling on atmospheric spectra. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1989, 47: 337~347. doi:  10.1007/BF00122338
    [5] Moncrieff J B, Mahli Y, Leuning R. The propagation of errors in long-term measurements of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2: 231~240. doi:  10.1111/gcb.1996.2.issue-3
    [6] Massman W J. Reply to comment by Rannik on A simple method for estimating frequency response corrections for eddy covariance systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001,107:204~251.
    [7] Moore C J. Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1986, 37: 17~35. doi:  10.1007/BF00122754
    [8] Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S-M, et al. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: Methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2: 169~182. doi:  10.1111/gcb.1996.2.issue-3
    [9] Massman W J. A simple method for estimating frequency response corrections for eddy covariance systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000, 104: 185~198. doi:  10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00164-7
    [10] Kaimal J C, Wyngaard J C, Izumi Y, et al. Deriving power spectra from a three-component sonic anemometer. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1972, 7: 827~837.
    [11] Gash J H C, Culf A D. Applying a linear detrend to eddy correlation data in real time. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1996, 79: 301~306. doi:  10.1007/BF00119443
    [12] Finnigan J J, Clements R, Mahli Y. A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2003,107(1):1~48. doi:  10.1023/A:1021554900225
    [13] Hgstrm U. An alternative explanation for the systematic height variation of normalized vertical velocity variance in the near-neutral surface layer. In 14th Symposium on Boundary Layer and Turbulence, 2000. 31-32, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.
    [14] McMillen R T. An eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1988, 43: 231~245. doi:  10.1007/BF00128405
    [15] Garrat J R. The internal boundary layer- a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1990, 50: 171~203. doi:  10.1007/BF00120524
    [16] Finnigan J. A comment on the paper by Lee (1998): "On micrometeorological observations of surface air-exchange over tall vegetation". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1999, 97: 55~64. doi:  10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00049-0
    [17] Smith R B. The influence of mountain on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, 1979, 21, 87~230. doi:  10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60262-9
    [18] Tanner C B, Thurtell G W. Anemoclinometer measurements of Reynolds stress and heat transport in the atmospheric surface layer. Dept. Of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Research and Development Tech Report ECOM 66-G22-F to the US Army Electronics Command, 1969.
    [19] Wilczak J M, Oncley S P, Stage S A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction alforithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000,99(1):127~150.
    [20] Lee X, Barr A G. Climatology of gravity waves in a forest. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1998, 124: 1403~1419. doi:  10.1002/(ISSN)1477-870X
    [21] Paw U K T, Baldocchi D D, Meyers T P, et al. Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000, 97: 487~511. doi:  10.1023/A:1002786702909
    [22] Finnigan J. A streamline coordinate system for distorted turbulent shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 130: 241~258. doi:  10.1017/S002211208300107X
    [23] Kristensen L. Time series analysis. Dealing with imperfect data. RisoNational Laboratory, Riso-I-1228(EN), 1998. 31.
    [24] Sakai R K, Fitzjarrald D R, Moore K E. Importance of low-frequency contributions to eddy fluxes observed over rough surfaces. Submitted to Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2001.
    [25] Leclerc M Y, Thurtell G W. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1990, 91: 39~49.
    [26] Hu X, Lee X, Steven D E. A numerical study of nocturnal wavelike motion in forests. Submitted to Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2001.
    [27] Wyngaard J, Kosovic B. Similarity of stricture-function parameters in the stably stratified boundary-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1994, 71: 277~296. doi:  10.1007/BF00713742
    [28] Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S-M, et al. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: Methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2:169~182. doi:  10.1111/gcb.1996.2.issue-3
    [29] Wofsy S C, Goulden M L, Munger J W, et al. Net exchange of CO2 in a midlatitude forest. Science, 1993, 260: 1314~1317. doi:  10.1126/science.260.5112.1314
    [30] Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, et al. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: The EUROFLUX methodology. Advances in Ecological research, 2000, 30: 113~175.
    [31] Black T A, Chen W J, Barr A G, et al. Increased carbon sequestration by a boreal deciduous forest in years with a warm spring. Geophysical Research Letters, 2000, 27: 1271~1274. doi:  10.1029/1999GL011234
    [32] Grace J, Malhi Y, Lloyd J, et al. The use of eddy covariance to infer the net carbon dioxide uptake of Brazilian rain forest. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2: 209~217. doi:  10.1111/gcb.1996.2.issue-3
  • 加载中
图(4)
计量
  • 摘要浏览量:  3366
  • HTML全文浏览量:  612
  • PDF下载量:  1551
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2002-09-22
  • 修回日期:  2003-03-10
  • 刊出日期:  2004-04-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回