MM5模式中湿方案的不确定性对“03·7”南京暴雨数值模拟不确定性的影响
Influence of Moist Schemes in MM5 on the Uncertainties of "03·7" Heavy Rainfall Numerical Simulation
-
摘要: 利用有限区域非静力MM5模式, 分析了显式降水方案对于2003年7月4—5日南京暴雨数值模拟的不确定性影响。采用混合方案模拟此次暴雨时, 这种不确定性决定于显式和隐式方案的相互协调性及敏感性; 隐式方案基本决定了雨带的整体的空间分布, 而显式方案对于降水型及降水量起到一定的调节作用, 调节的程度与选择的参数化方案有关; 采用隐式方案Grell和KF2模拟此次暴雨时, 应考虑不同的显式方案对于降水模拟的不确定性的影响。Abstract: The weather forecast produced by numerical weather prediction models has been an important means in the operational forecast, however there exists intrinsic uncertainty. This uncertainty is caused by both the ones in the initial conditions and the ones in the numerical model itself. In the process of the numerical prediction, it is important to consider these errors since the nature of the atmospheric dynamics is to amplify errors originating from either of them. At present, with the application of the massive non-conventional data, such as satellite and radar data in the assimilation system, it is possible to produce the relatively more accurate initial fields. Thus, the uncertainty of numerical model may be more important to forecast especially in the various moist physical process schemes. In recent years, with the ever-improving performance of numerical prediction models and ever-increasing computational resources, the explicit schemes are used to forecast the strong precipitation process in the high resolution mesoscale models gradually with hybrid approach. However, what is the role of explicit schemes and what extension they lead to the Meiyu front heavy rainfall forecast uncertainty? All these issues are worth being further studied. In terms of non-hydrostatic MM5, the impact of explicit moist schemes on the uncertainties in the numerical simulation of the "03·7" Nanjing heavy rainfall is investigated. According to the simulated 24-hour accumulated rain spatial pattern and Ts skill of the variance experiments, the uncertainty depends on the explicit and implicit schemes' relative coordination and sensitivity when the hybrid approach is used to describe the cloud and precipitation process. The implicit schemes determine the spatial pattern of the rain bands, while the explicit schemes adjust the local rain pattern and density. The extent to which the rain band adjusted is related to the convective parameterization. The difference in the rates of resolve scale rainfall to total rainfall in different experiments indicates the uncertainty due to explicit schemes. At the same time, in the center of the simulated strong precipitation region, for the convective parameterization of Grell and KF2, the resolve resolution precipitation of the explicit schemes accounts for the 1/3—2/3 of the total rainfall; for the BM, the unresolved rain dominates the total accumulated rainfall. It indicates that, the explicit schemes play an important role in the precipitation simulation for Grell and KF2 with the hybrid approach, on the other hand, it is inhibited for the BM schemes. Thus, the uncertainties of explicit schemes should be considered when implicit scheme Grell or KF2 is used to simulate the heavy rainfall.
-
表 1 数值试验方案
表 2 试验T1~T12降水Ts评分
-
[1] Martin Ehrendorfer. Predicting the uncertainty of numerical weather forecasts: a review. Meteorol Zeitschrift, N F 6, 1997: 147-183. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/showciting?cid=202426 [2] Lorenz E N. The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 1969, 3: 291-307. doi: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x/abstract [3] Jimy Dudhia, Dave Gill, Kevin Manning, et al. PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and Users' Guide (MM5 Modeling System Version 3). MM5 Tutorial, NCAR, 2005. [4] Molinari J, Dudek M. Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon Wea Rev, 1992, 120: 326-344. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0326:POCPIM>2.0.CO;2 [5] Morris L Weisman, William C Skamarock, Joseph B Klemp. The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon Wea Rev, 1997, 125: 527-548. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0527:TRDOEM>2.0.CO;2 [6] 王建捷, 胡欣, 郭肖容. MM5模式中不同对流参数化方案的比较试验.应用气象学报, 2002, 12 (1): 41-53. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20010105&flag=1 [7] 王晨稀, 端义宏.短期集合预报技术在梅雨降水预报中的试验研究.应用气象学报, 2003, 14 (1): 69-77. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20030108&flag=1 [8] 陈静, 薛纪善, 颜宏.华南中尺度暴雨数值预报的不确定性与集合预报试验.气象学报, 2003, 61 (4): 432-446. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200304004.htm [9] 中国气象学会水文气象学委员会. 新世纪气象科技创新与大气科学发展———03.7淮河大水的水文气象学问题. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003: 7-8. [10] 王洪利, 沈桐立, 张曼.可降水量资料反演及在暴雨数值模拟中的初步应用.南京气象学院学报, 2004, 27 (4): 443-450. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJQX200404002.htm [11] Zhang D L, Fritsch J M. Numerical sensitivity experiments of varying model physics on the structure, evolution, and dynamics of two mesoscale systems. J Atmos Sci, 1988, 45: 261-293. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<0261:NSEOVM>2.0.CO;2 [12] Wang Wei, Seaman N L. A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a Mesoscale Model. Mon Wea Rev, 1997, 125: 252-278. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0252:ACSOCP>2.0.CO;2 [13] 张大林.各种非绝热物理过程在中尺度模式中的应用.大气科学, 1998, 22 (7): 548-561. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK804.015.htm [14] 楼小凤, 胡志晋, 王鹏云, 等.中尺度模式云降水物理方案介绍.应用气象学报, 2003, 14 (增刊): 49-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2003S1006.htm