全球地面天气报历史资料质量检查与分析
Quality Check and Analysis on the Historic Global Surface Synoptic Observations
-
摘要: 全球地面天气报资料是气象资料中数据量最大、使用频率最高的资料之一。国内作为气候资料接收和保存的全球地面天气报资料中包含45个气象要素, 每日4次定时观测资料。利用2005年用于全球地面天气报资料接收、处理实时业务中的质量控制方法, 对保存于国家气象信息中心气象资料室的全球地面天气报历史资料数据集进行了全面的质量检查, 对原数据集中因解码而引起的比较明显的批量错误资料进行了修改, 生成具有质量控制码的二版全球地面天气报历史资料数据集。同时还系统介绍了1980年1月—2003年12月全球地面天气报历史资料数据集质量检查结果, 分析了资料的质量情况。
-
关键词:
- 质量检查;
- 质量分析;
- 全球地面天气报历史资料
Abstract: The primary purpose of the quality check is to verify the data validity and correct the wrong ones on time. Global surface synoptic data are one of the largest quantities and the most frequently used data in meteorological observations. As the climatic data received and saved in the Climatic Data Office of NMIC (National Meteorological Information Center) in China, the global surface synoptic data are made up of 45 meteorological variables, 4 times observations in term hour daily from approximately 6000 stations around the world. The data have to go through visual observation, instrument reading, recording, encoding transmission by GTS, and decoding etc. It is generally agreed that error data may come into being as a result of each of the above processing stages. Data message format detection and error station number correction are processed to decrease error data induced by data transmission prior to the quality check. The quality control (QC) regulations of global surface synoptic data have been developed in China. The QC procedures in the regulations have been implemented in the operation on global surface synoptic observations' real-time receiving and saving. Using the QC procedures, the historic global surface synoptic dataset stored in Climatic Data Office of NMIC is quality-checked. At the same time, large amounts of data decoded by errors are corrected and then historic global surface synoptic dataset version 2 with quality flags is made. Also, the result of quality check and quality analysis of historic global surface synoptic data from 1980 to 2003 is presented.A large number of error data detected at the stages of data message format check, error station number check and data quality check are corrected or deleted. The quality of the historic global surface synoptic dataset version 2 has been improved greatly. By quality check, the suspect data are 20.3‰, error data is 2.0‰ in historic global surface synoptic dataset version 2. Both the total number of doubtful messages and that of error data of various main variables decrease gradually from 1980 to 2003, which shows their qualities in the dataset are improved. The main variables are those whose percentage received during the hour following the time of observation in term hour is more than 80%. After quality check and some error data processing, the suspect data and the error data of dataset version 2 from 1982 to 1999 are about 18.3‰ and 1.8‰ respectively. Due to the wrong decoding of air temperature and dew point temperature, the error data of dataset version 2 are up to 3.5‰ or so from 1980 to 1981.The percentage of suspect data after 1999 increases to about 30.2‰ as a result of inconsistency between precipitation amount collected in various time intervals, inconsistency between minimum air temperatures and ground surface status. -
表 1 1980—2003年全球地面天气报资料质量检查结果
表 2 气候界限值检查的历年错误率
-
[1] WMO. Manual on GDPS. WMO-No.485, 1992, 1:Ⅱ 1-4. [2] WMO. Guide on the GOS. WMO-No.488, 1989. [3] Fillipov V V. Quality Control of Meteorological Data. World Weather Watch Planning Report, WMO-No.26, 1968. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GXQX201103022.htm [4] WMO. Guide on the GDPS. WMO-No.305, 1993. [5] Peterson T C, Vose R S, Schmoyer R, et al. Global historical climatology network (GHCN) quality control of monthly temperature data. Int J Climatol, 1998, 18:1169-1179. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088 [6] Lanzante J R. Resistant, robust and nonparametric techniques for the analysis of climate data:theory and examples, including applications to historical radiosonde station data.Int J Climatol, 1996, 16:1197-1226. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088 [7] Vejen F, Jacobsson C, Fredriksson U, et al. Quality Control of Meteorological Observations Automatic Methods Used in the Nordic Countries. Climate Report, No.8, 2002. [8] Eischeid Jon C, Bruce Baker, Tom Karl, et al. The quality control of long-term climatological data using objective data analysis. J Appl Met, 1995, 34:2787-2795. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2787:TQCOLT>2.0.CO;2 [9] 周尚河.全国高空资料质量控制和建库方法的研究.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(3):364-370. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000353&flag=1 [10] 吴增祥.气象台站历史沿革信息及其对观测资料序列均一性影响的初步分析.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(4):461-467. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050458&flag=1 [11] 刘小宁, 任芝花.地面气象资料质量控制方法研究概述.气象科技, 2005, 33(3):199-203. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200503001.htm [12] 任芝花, 刘小宁, 杨文霞.极端异常气象资料的综合性质量控制与分析.气象学报, 2005, 63(4):526-533. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200504013.htm [13] 王伯民.基本气象资料质量控制综合判别法的研究.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(增刊):50-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2004S1008.htm [14] 应显勋, 赵昭忻, 陆志贤, 等.国家、区域和省三级分布式实时气象资料数据库系统综合功能规格书.北京:气象出版社, 1993. [15] 许松.全球地面天气报数据集错站情况分析及处理方法的研究.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(增刊):128-133. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2004S1018.htm [16] WMO. Manual on Codes. 1995.