设为首页
加入收藏
辐射参数化方案对一个海气耦合模式云和辐射模拟的影响
The Effects of Radiative Parameterization Scheme on Simulation of Cloud and Radiation in an AOGCM
-
摘要: 比较Morcrette辐射方案和Fu_Liou辐射方案对NCC/IAP T63海气耦合模式云和辐射模拟的影响, 结果表明:两种方案模拟的大气顶入射辐射存在明显的差异; 晴空大气Fu_Liou方案的短波吸收能力在全球普遍较Morcrette方案低; 在60°S~60°N之间, Fu_Liou方案模拟的行星反照率更接近于ERBE卫星观测; 在对大气顶净辐射的模拟上, 除了冬季的太平洋和大西洋东岸云量明显减少的部分地区外, Fu_Liou方案对大气顶净辐射的模拟总体上较Morcrette方案有了较为明显的改善; Fu_Liou方案模拟的海洋低层云显著减少, 而热带地区高云的模拟明显增加; 由于采用了“二元云量”算法, 尽管云量有所减少, Fu_Liou方案模拟的云短波吸收作用仍有所增强, 一定程度上改进了Morcrette方案云的短波吸收作用偏弱的现象。Abstract: Radiation is an important process in atmosphere. Currently the radiative parameterization schemes used in climate models are mainly simplified arithmetic, which show great uncertainty in climate change projection. To better understand the effects of radiative parameterizations on cloud and radiation simulation, a new parameterization scheme, Fu_Liou scheme, is introduced into NCC/IAP T63 AOGCM to replace the old scheme, Morcrette scheme. NCC/IAP T63 AOGCM is a spectral model with triangular truncation at wave number 63. The horizontal resolution is 1.875°×1.875° for both atmosphere and ocean component, and there are 16 and 30 vertical layers for atmosphere and ocean respectively. The main differences between two radiative schemes are in such aspects as division of waveband, approximation for radiative transfer, and treatment of cloud layer overlap in radiation calculation. In Fu_Liou scheme, the waveband is divided into 18 sub-wavebands, 6 for shortwave and 12 for long wave, while there are only 8 sub-wavebands (2 for shortwave and 6 for long wave) in Morcrette scheme. Fu_Liou scheme adopts δ-four-stream approximation which has high calculating accuracy, and uses the binary cloud when calculating the cloud effects on radiation. Two 20-year integrations are processed by use of the two schemes respectively. The first 10 years are used for coupling adjustment, and the last 10 years for analysis. Two types of monthly mean data, 40-year reanalysis data of European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)(ERA-40) and data from Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE), are used to verify the results. The effects of the two schemes on the simulation of cloud and radiation are analysed in detail. The main results are as follows:Firstly, the incident radiation at TOA simulated by two schemes differs obviously, which is mainly caused by the difference in radiative arithmetic. Secondly, in clear sky the shortwave absorption of FuLiou scheme is generally lower than Morcrette scheme, especially in middle and high latitudes of winter hemisphere. The planetary albedo simulated by Fu_Liou scheme is closer to ERBE data than Morcrette scheme between 60°S and 60°N, mainly due to the improvement of simulation on clear-sky albedo. Thirdly, the simulated net radiation at TOA in Fu_Liou scheme is improved obviously as compared with Morcrette scheme except for part of the east Pacific and east Atlantic where the cloud cover decreases remarkably in winter. Finally, the low stratocumulus simulated by Fu_Liou scheme decreases remarkably, which is caused by the weakening of static stability over ocean. The high cloud increases obviously, mainly due to the intensifying of convection in tropical region, as compared with Morcrette scheme. Although the cloud cover decreases, the use of binary cloud increases the cloud shortwave absorption in Fu_Liou scheme which improves the weak absorption in Morcrette scheme in some degree.
-
Key words:
- radiative parameterization;
- AOGCM;
- cloud and radiation;
- simulation
-
图 1 大气顶入射短波辐射变化的经向-时间剖面 (单位:W·m-2)(Fu方案-Mor方案)
Fig. 1 Meridion-height section of incident solar radiation at the top of atmosphere (unit:W·m-2) (Fu scheme-Mor scheme)
图 2 全球平均地面气温的季节变化
Fig. 2 Seasonal variation of global-averaged surface air temperature
图 3 两种辐射方案晴空大气短波吸收率差值的经向-高度剖面
(Fu方案-Mor方案)
Fig. 3 Meridion-height section of differences in shortwave absorption rate between two radiative schemes in clear sky
(Fu scheme-Mor scheme)
图 4 行星反照率差值
(单位:%)(a, b:Mor方案-ERBE; c, d:Fu方案-Mor方案; a, c:夏季; b, d:冬季)
Fig. 4 Differences in the planetary albedo
(unit:%)(a, b:Mor scheme-ERBE, c, d:Fu scheme-Mor scheme; a, c:summer; b, d:winter)
图 5 大气顶短波辐射差值
(单位:W·m-2)(a, b:Mor方案-ERA; c, d:Fu方案-Mor方案; a, c:夏季; b, d:冬季)
Fig. 5 Differences in the shortwave radiation at the top of atmosphere
(unit:W·m-2) (a, b:Mor scheme-ERA; c, d:Fu scheme-Mor scheme; a, c:summer; b, d:winter)
图 6 大气顶净辐射差值
(单位:W·m-2)(a, b:Mor方案-ERA; c, d:Fu方案-Mor方案; a, c:夏季; b, d:冬季)
Fig. 6 Differences in the net radiation at the top of atmosphere
(unit:W·m-2) (a, b:Mor scheme-ERA; c, d:Fu scheme-Mor scheme; a, c:summer; b, d:winter)
图 7 纬向平均总云量变化的经向-高度剖面
(单位:%)(Fu方案-Mor方案)
Fig. 7 Meridion-height section of the total cloud cover change
(unit:%)(Fu scheme-Mor scheme)
-
[1] Liou K N.大气辐射导论 (第二版).北京:气象出版社, 2004. [2] 尹宏.大气辐射学基础.北京:气象出版社, 1993. [3] Houghton J T, Jenkins G J, Ephraums J J, et al. IPCC, Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Contribution of Working Group Ⅰ to the First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1990:1-365. [4] Houghton J T, Meira Filho L G, Callander B A, et al. IPCC, Climate Change 1995:The Science of Climate Change.Contribution of Working Group Ⅰ to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996:1-572. [5] IPCC.Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group Ⅰ to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001. [6] 沈元芳, 伊兰, 陈宜, 等.辐射参数化的变化对模式中期和月预报的影响.应用气象学报, 2002, 13(3):299-311. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020340&flag=1 [7] 李清泉, 王兰宁, 徐影.辐射参数化方案对气候模拟和回报的影响.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(增刊):12-21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2005S1001.htm [8] 汪方, 丁一汇, 徐影.一个海气耦合模式模拟的云辐射过程.气象学报, 2005, 63(5):716-727. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200505015.htm [9] 国家气象中心编译. 资料同化和中期数值预报. 北京: 气象出版社, 1991. [10] 董敏, 耿全震, 梁益国, 等.气候模式的基本原理和技术方法.北京:气象出版社, 1997:1-177. [11] 董敏.国家气候中心大气环流模式———基本原理和使用说明.北京:气象出版社, 2001:1-152. [12] Jin X Z, Zhang X H, Zhou T J. Fundamental framework and experiments of the third generation of IAP/LASG world ocean general circulation model. Adv Atmos Sci, 1999, 16(2):197-215. doi: 10.1007/BF02973082 [13] Fu Q, Liou K N. On the correlated k-distribution method for radiative transfer in nonhomogeneous atmospheres. J Atmos Sci, 1992, 49:2139-2156. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2139:OTCDMF>2.0.CO;2 [14] Fu Q, Liou K N. Parameterizations of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. J Atmos Sci, 1993, 50:2008-2025. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO;2 [15] Fu Q, Liou K N, Cribb M C, et al. Grossman multiple scattering parameterization in thermal infrared radiative transfer. J Atmos Sci, 1997, 54:2799-2812. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2799:MSPITI>2.0.CO;2 [16] Morcrette J J. Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the ECMWF operational weather forecast model. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96:9121-9132. doi: 10.1029/89JD01597 [17] Gu Y, Farrara J, Liou K N, et al. Parameterization of cloud/radiation processes in the UCLA general circulation model. J Climate, 2003, 16:3357-3370. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3357:POCPIT>2.0.CO;2 [18] Stephens G L, Gabriel P M, Partain P T. Parameterization of atmospheric radiative transfer.Part Ⅰ:Validity of simple models. J Atmos Sci, 2001, 58:3391-3409. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3391:POARTP>2.0.CO;2 [19] Barkstrom B R. The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE). Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1984, 65(11):1170-1185. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<1170:TERBE>2.0.CO;2 [20] 汪方, 丁一汇.气候模式中云辐射反馈过程机理的评述.地球科学进展, 2005, 20(2):207-215. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ20050200A.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 3413
- HTML全文浏览量: 697
- PDF下载量: 1893
- 被引次数: 0
