不同强风样本湍流特性参数的计算分析
Turbulent Characteristic Parameter of Different Strong Wind Samples
-
摘要: 在结构风工程中, 风湍流统计参数计算的正确与否直接影响到风荷载的计算精度。在实际风参数计算与分析中, 多选用风速较大的样本资料, 但过分强调大风可能产生不合理的计算结果。利用超声风速仪瞬时风速观测资料, 分别划分成相对强风和持续强风样本, 计算并比较其湍流统计特性参数, 发现湍流统计参数特性值 (湍流度、阵风因子、摩擦速度等) 与风速大小并不能很好匹配, 有时风速不大但其湍流特性值却很大, 反之也然。研究表明:选取的湍流风资料样本或统计方法不同, 都会影响风特性参数的计算结果, 进而影响到风荷载计算的精度。这一结果对于提高结构风工程中风参数计算与设计的科学性和合理性具有现实意义。Abstract:
In structure wind engineering, the accuracy of wind turbulent characteristic parameter is extremely important to the calculation of wind load of large structures. In the actual wind observation and analysis, the gale data are generally used to analyze the turbulent parameter characteristics, and more attentions are caught by the strong wind such as typhoon in coastal area. The calculation of wind turbulent characteristic parameter may be disturbed by an excessive attention given to the strong wind data. Moreover, the precision in the calculation of wind load may decline. In order to comprehend the impact of different strong wind samples upon the calculation of turbulent characteristic parameter values, an analysis and a comparison between two groups of wind speed samples are made. In the experiment, the CSAT3D three dimensional supersonic anemometer is used to observe the instantaneous wind speed from June to September in 2005 on the no rthern coast of Jiaozhou Gulf. About 605 hours effective wind observation data or 3631 subsamples are obtained in the experiment and divided into 10-min time step. The subsamples are divided into two groups according to different wind speed. One is called continual strong wind sample, in which the average wind speed during 10 minutes of each subsample is more than 8 m/s and the duration is more than 30 minutes. The other is called relative strong wind sample, in which the average wind speed of the subsamples is not always more than 8 m/s. The turbulent characteristic parameters of the two wind sample groups are calculated and a comparison between the two groups is made accordingly. It shows that though the average wind speed of continual strong breeze samples is about 37.6% more than that of relative strong wind samples, the average turbulent intensity of the relative strong breeze is 18%—23.5% smaller than that of the comparative strong wind samples, and the former average gust factor is more than 10%smaller than the latter, where as the former average friction velocity is 50% more than the latter. These results show that the value of wind turbulent characteristic parameter doesn't match the wind velocity well. Sometimes the wind velocity is small but its turbulent characteristic parameter value is big and vice versa. So, different wind velocity sample or different statistical methods may affect the calculation results of wind turbulent characteristic parameter.The calculation of wind turbulent characteristic parameter may be affected by an excessive attention given to the strong wind data. Moreover, the precision in the calculation of wind load may decline.
-
表 1 60 m高度风观测样本平均风速
Table 1 The average wind speed observed with CSAT3D at 60-meter height
表 2 强风和持续强风样本的平均湍流度 (I) 和阵风因子 (G)
Table 2 The average turbulence intensity (I) and gust factor (G) of the two sample groups
-
[1] 庞加斌, 林志兴, 葛耀君.浦东地区近地强风特性观测研究.流体力学实验与测量, 2002, 16(3):32-39. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LTLC200203005.htm [2] Simiu E, Scanlan R H. Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design. New York:John Wiley & Sons, INC, 1996. [3] 丁伟钰, 陈子通.利用TRMM资料分析2002年登陆广东的热带气旋降水分布特征.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(4):436-444. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040453&flag=1 [4] 刘树华, 李洁, 刘和平, 等.在EBEX-2000实验资料中湍流谱和局地各向同性特征.大气科学, 2005, 29(2):213-224. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200502005.htm [5] Amiro B D. Drag coefficients and turbulence specta within three boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteor, 1990, 52 : 227-246. doi: 10.1007/BF00122088 [6] Andersen O J, Lovseth J. Gale force maritime wind, the Froya data base. Part1: Sites and instrumentation, review of the database. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 57: 97-109. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(94)00101-I [7] Sparks P R, Reid G T, Reid W D, et al. Wind conditions in hurricane Hugo by measurement, inference, and experience. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1992, 41(11):55-66. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016761059290393O [8] 许丽人, 李宗恺, 张宏曻.不同下垫面上近地层湍流的多尺度属性研究.气象学报, 2000, 58(1):83-94. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200001007.htm [9] 王存忠, 曹文俊.天津市郊大气边界层湍谱特征分析.气象学报, 1994, 52(4):484-491. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB404.011.htm [10] 宋丽莉, 毛慧琴, 黄浩辉, 等.登陆台风近地层湍流特征观测分析.气象学报, 2005, 63(6):915-921. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200506007.htm [11] 张光智, 徐祥德, 王继志, 等.采用外场观测试验资料对登陆台风“黄蜂”的风场及湍流特征的观测研究.应用气象学报, 2004, 12(增刊):110-115. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2004S1015.htm [12] 卞林根, 陆龙骅, 程彦杰, 等.青藏高原东南部昌都地区近地层湍流输送的观测研究.应用气象学报, 2001, 12(1):1-13. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20010101&flag=1 [13] 项海帆, 林志兴, 等.公路桥梁抗风设计指南.北京:人民交通出版社, 1996. [14] Panofsky H A, Dutton J A. Atmospheric Turbulence-models and Methods for Engineering Application. Wiley, Ny, 1984. https://books.google.com/books/about/Atmospheric_turbulence.html?id=pSVRAAAAMAAJ [15] Xu Y L, Zhan S. Field measurements of Diwang tower during Typhoon York. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89: 73-93. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00029-5 [16] Tieleman H W, Mullins S E. The Structure of Moderately Strong Winds at a Mid-Atlantic Coastal Site/Below 75 m/Wind Engineering. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, Fort Collins, Colo, United Kingdom, 1980, 217-218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23578102_The_structure_of_moderately_strong_winds_at_a_mid-Atlantic_coastal_site_below_75m