地面雨滴谱观测的图像自动识别方法
Automatic Identification Methods of Ground Raindrop Spectrum Observation and Image
-
摘要: 该文介绍了地面雨滴谱观测方法的研究, 通过增大取样面积、增加辅助观测手段, 改进了传统的滤纸取样法, 设计出图像自动识别软件应用到雨滴谱资料的处理中, 这种方法不仅可以增加观测的样本数, 以获得稳定的雨滴谱资料, 而且有利于资料的相互配合与分析。对其图像的位置变化、形状改变、滴谱重叠等情况进行验证以及对计算结果进行误差分析, 雨滴谱资料中的单个滴谱图像位置变化和形状变化对图像识别后的结果没有影响, 自动图像处理程序运行结果稳定可靠。程序在处理不粘连的滴谱资料时敏感性较好, 对于大滴溅散而形成的很多溅散滴时, 会处理成很多单独的小雨滴, 同时也说明无法解决溅散问题。在雨滴重叠问题上该程序智能程度不高, 不能真正鉴别是否存在重叠现象, 无法将重叠的雨滴分离开来, 往往会将重叠在一起的雨滴视为一个滴, 从而带来观测雨滴数量减少的现象。从雨滴谱资料处理误差分析上看, 斑迹直径在3~18 mm时相对误差小于6%, 对于直径小于4 mm雨滴误差完全控制在6%以内, 且在处理小滴时误差更小。该方法在地面雨滴谱观测及资料处理中准确度高、性能稳定、实用性强, 为雨滴谱资料的处理分析提供了一个新的思路, 可以应用到实际工作中。Abstract: The ground raindrop spectrum observation method is studied. The traditional filter paper sampling method is improved through enlarging the sample area, and increasing the methods of auxiliary observation. The image automatic identification software is designed and put into application in the processing of the raindrop spectrum data. Not only the sample member to obtain stable raindrop spectra data is enlarged by these ways, but also the mutual coordination and the analysis of the data are benefited. It is tested and result error analysis on its image position variation, the shape change, the drop spectrum overlaps and so on is made. The pattern recognition results are not influenced by the location and shape changes of single drop image in the data of the raindrop spectra data. The automatic image procedure is stable and reliable. It is very sensible when the separated drop spectra data are dealt with by the procedure. When many scattered drops formed from big drops, a large member of independent small raindrops will be formed, and it manifests that the splash problem can't be solved. The intelligence of the procedure is not high on the problem of raindrop overlapping each other together and it can't be recognized if the phenomenon of overlap really exists, the overlapped raindrops can't be separated and the overlapped drops can't be taken as one drop, so the member of the observing drops is small. From the error analysis of the raindrop spectra data, the relative error of spot mark diameter is smaller than 6% from 3 mm to 18 mm and the error is controlled within 6% for drops smaller than 4 mm, the error is even smaller when handling the small droplets. The result is obtained that this method is of great accuracy, stable performance, and very practical in the ground raindrop spectrum observation and the data processing. A new thought for the raindrop spectrum data processing analysis is provided and can be applied to the practical work.
-
表 1 图像处理程序运行结果
Table 1 Outputs of image processing program
-
[1] 何珍珍. 泰山一次雷雨雨滴谱观测结果∥中国科学院地球物理研究所. 我国云雾降水微物理特征的研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 1965: 69-74. [2] 邓雪娇, 黄浩辉, 吴兑.广州地区汛期强降水的微物理特征.热带气象学报, 1996, 12(2):167-173. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX602.008.htm [3] 李大山.人工影响天气技术体系的研究.北京:气象出版社, 1991:263-265. [4] 陈金荣, 马生伟.GBPP-100型地面雨滴谱仪测量的可靠性.南京气象学院学报, 1995, 18(2):213-219. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJQX502.008.htm [5] 陈宝君, 李子华, 刘吉成, 等.三类降水云雨滴谱分布模式.气象学报, 1998, 56(4):506-512. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB804.012.htm [6] 周毓荃, 刘晓天, 周非非, 等.河南干旱年地面雨滴谱特征.应用气象学报, 2001, 12(增刊):39-47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2001S1005.htm [7] 陈德林, 谷淑芳.大暴雨雨滴平均谱的研究.气象学报, 1989, 47(1):124-127. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB198901015.htm [8] 李珊.湛江一次降水过程的最佳雨滴谱分析.广西气象, 2001, 22(1):30-34. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXQX200101008.htm [9] 江祖凡.庐山暴雨雨滴谱分析.气象科学研究院院刊, 1988, 3 (1):25-31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX198801014.htm [10] Scheleusener P E. Drop Size Distribution and Energy of Falling Raindrops from a Medium Pressure Irrigation Sprinkler. Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1967:45-48. [11] Hall M J. Use of the stain method in determining of the dropsize distribution of coarse liquid sprays. Trans ASAE, 1970, 13 (1):33-37. doi: 10.13031/2013.38528 [12] Kohl R A. Drop size distribution from medium-sized agricultural sprinklers. Trans ASAE, 1974, 17 (4):690-693. doi: 10.13031/2013.36938 [13] Roels J M.Personal Communication. Laboratory of PhysicalGeography, Geographical Institute, University of Utrecht, Netherlands, 1981:127-136. [14] McCooll D K. Personal Communication. USDA-ARS. Agricultural Engineering Department, Washington State University, Pullman, 1982:67-82. [15] 许焕斌.衡山云雾微结构起伏的初步观测试验.气象学报, 1964, 34(4):539-547. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB196404014.htm