L波段电子探空仪相对湿度误差研究及其应用
Relative Humidity Error of L-band Electronic Radiosonde and Its Application
-
摘要: 为了提高高空大气探测数据准确度, 我国从2002年1月开始推广使用L波段雷达-电子探空仪探测系统, 用携带碳湿敏元件的数字式电子探空仪代替用肠膜测湿元件的59型探空仪进行相对湿度探测。但大量的实测探空资料表明:相对湿度探空曲线仍然存在较大误差。利用能测到-30℃低温的高精度湿度校准设备在-30~30℃试验温度范围内对碳湿敏元件进行大量静态测试, 在进一步了解碳湿敏电阻校准线随温度变化的特征基础上, 结合实际探空资料, 修正工厂的相对湿度订正原理和公式, 从而可以提高碳湿敏电阻在高湿端的测量准确度, 提高判断云层垂直位置的准确性, 进而提高L波段探空仪温度测量的精度。Abstract: The upper-air sounding data are one of the basic data applied in meteorology. The analysis and forecast of synoptic situation and weather system are directly affected by the accuracy of the data. Therefore, for the purpose of improving sounding accuracy, L-band electrical radiosonde has been employed broadly since January, 2002. Its data acquisition rate, accuracy and reliability, and the degree of automation have improved significantly since then. The new radiosonde has been implemented with carbon-film hygristor instead of Gold beaters skin hygristor to measure relative humidity. The measurement is made more accurately by the high sensitivity, short lag time, and fast response in low temperature of upper-air of carbon-film hygristor. In addition, the carbon-film has good consistency with device calibration line, which does not need to calibrate one by one. So the cost of production can be saved. The carbon-film hygristor, however, is significantly influenced by temperature. Data errors will be yielded by failure to calibrate it accurately. There are many researches on carbon-film hygristor performances but still without very encouraging results. Because of the complexity of upper-air observation, there is not a widely accepted standard to test sounding instruments' performances by the international community. Right now, the relative humidity data are corrected mainly by the radiosonde manufacturer. Whether the applied revising formula is reasonable or not, how is the corrected results, all need to be tested by objective analysis. However, a large number of the actual release record still shows a huge error in relative humidity sounding curve. Especially the unstable relative humidity data in the clouds which decrease strikingly with the increased altitude, and the decision of cloud location are affected directly. The accuracy of temperature detection and calculation of the geopotential height are thereby lowered. The process of correcting relative humidity data of the new L-band sounding system is described. Using the high-resolution humidity calibration equipment, many static-state testing experiments of the carbon-film hygristor are conducted at temperatures from-30 ℃ to 30 ℃, by which a substantial amount of data is acquired. Through the test results, the various properties of this element in detail are noticed. Also a mistake in correcting formula by the manufacturers is found because of their negligence to test the influence of paralleling 1 Megohm resistance in the circuit. Based on the analysis and calculation on these lab data, the correction equation of relative humidity is re-established. The comparison and analysis of correction on real upper-air sounding data of relative humidity indicate that not only the accuracy of relative humidity data is improved after correction, but also the detailed variations in relative humidity at the upper atmosphere during high humidity range can be clearly manifested. So the ability to judge vertical position of cloud layer is improved, so is the temperature measurement precision.
-
图 4 方法A得到的湿敏电阻在不同温度下的校准曲线
(图中校准曲线从左到右对应的温度分别为-60 ℃, -50 ℃, -40 ℃, -30 ℃, -20 ℃, -10 ℃, 0 ℃, 10 ℃, 20 ℃, 30 ℃)
Fig. 4 Different temperature calibrating curves by method A
(calibrating curve from left to right in the corresponding temperature of-60 ℃, -50 ℃, -40 ℃, -30 ℃, -20 ℃, -10 ℃, 0 ℃, 10 ℃, 20 ℃, 30 ℃)
图 5 方法B得到的不同温度下的校准曲线
(图中校准曲线从左到右对应的温度为-60 ℃, -50 ℃, -40 ℃, -30 ℃, -20 ℃, -10 ℃, 0 ℃, 10 ℃, 20 ℃, 30 ℃)
Fig. 5 Different temperature calibrating curve by method B
(calibrating curve from left to right in the corresponding temperature of -60 ℃, -50 ℃, -40 ℃, -30 ℃, -20 ℃, -10 ℃, 0 ℃, 10 ℃, 20 ℃, 30 ℃)
表 1 测试过程中试验设备设定的温度及相对湿度值
Table 1 Temperature and relative humidity values set in the testing process
-
[1] 李峰, 马舒庆.从毛里求斯国际对比看全球探空系统发展趋势.气象科技, 2006, 34(5):606-610. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200605022.htm [2] Li F. New Developments with Upper-air Sounding in China. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No.94, WMO/TD-No.1354.Geneva:WMO, 2006. [3] 姚玉琼, 姚倩, 钟志武.碳膜湿敏元件及其性能试验.气象科学技术集刊 (7)———大气探测试验研究.北京:气象出版社, 1985:10-15. [4] Miloshevich L M, Paukkunen A, Holger Vomel H, et al. Development and validation of a timelag correction for vaisala radiosonde humidity measurements. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2004, 21(9):1305-1327. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1305:DAVOAT>2.0.CO;2 [5] 李英干, 范金鹏.湿度测量.北京:气象出版社, 1990:311-325. [6] Reinaldo B da Silveira, Gilberto Fisch, Luiz A T Machado, et al. Executive Summary of the WMO Intercomparison of GPS Radiosondes. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No.76, WMO/TD-No 1153, Geneva:WMO, 2003:3-5. [7] Pathack B, Nash J, Smout R, et al. WMO Intercom parison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No.94, WMO/TD-No 1354, Geneva:WMO, 2006. [8] 马舒庆, 赵志强, 邢毅.Vaisala探空技术及中国探空技术的发展.气象科技, 2005, 33(4):390-393. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200505001.htm [9] 刘红亚, 薛纪善, 沈桐立, 等.探空气球漂移及其对数值预报影响的研究.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(4):518-525. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050465&flag=1 [10] http:∥www.ua.nws.noaa.gov/images/WMOmemo.htm. [11] 张霭琛.现代气象观测.北京:北京大学出版社, 2000:310-315. [12] 黄炳勋.GZZ-7型探空仪温度元件的辐射误差及滞后误差.气象科学技术集刊 (7)———大气探测试验研究.北京:气象出版社, 1985:1-8. [13] 郭亚田.有云大气中的长波辐射计算模式及其在探空中的应用.北京:中国气象科学研究院, 1988. [14] Guo Yatian, Huang Bingxun. Correction for Bias of Chinese Upper-air Measurements. Commission for Instruments and Mehtods of Observation, Geneva:WMO, 2004. [15] 姚雯, 郑国光, 黄炳勋, 等.气象探空测风软件系统的标准化研究.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(1):88-93. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040112&flag=1