设为首页
加入收藏
基于改进失水模式和增加建模站点的Palmer旱度模式
Modification of Palmer Drought Severity Model Based on Improving Water Loss Pattern and Increasing Sample Stations
-
摘要: 根据1965年Palmer旱度模式的思路，在1986年修正版及2003年修正版的基础上，为了使Palmer旱度模式更适用于我国北方干旱、半干旱地区，通过改进2003年修正的Palmer旱度模式在建模时表层失水模式的假设以及增加建模站点个数两个方面对Palmer旱度模式进行进一步修正。将计算的Palmer指数值与2003年计算的Palmer指数值及一些文献记载的实际旱涝灾情相对照进行验证，结果表明：新修正的Palmer旱度模式能更好地评估旱涝情况，扩大其在我国干旱地区的适用性。
-
关键词:
- 干旱指标;
- Palmer旱度模式;
- 失水模式
Abstract: After the modification of Palmer Drought Severity Model in 2003, it is found that the soil water loss pattern needs to be improved according to the actual soil water loss process. Also, in order to apply the Palmer Drought Severity Model more practical and more suitable in most arid and semi arid regions in north parts of China, Palmer Drought Severity Model is once again modified from the aspect of optimizing the soil water loss pattern and increasing the sample numbers of modeling stations.From the aspect of soil water loss pattern, in consideration that in most arid and semi arid regions in north parts of China, evapotranspiration will stop when soil water content in 0—20 cm layer is about 5% of available water consumption (Caw). Thus in the soil water loss pattern in modeling Palmer Drought Severity, it is supposed that the soil water loss in upper soil layer will be no less than 5% of Caw.Besides Jinan, Zhengzhou, and Taiyuan stations, Qiqihaer station in Heilongjiang Province and Haiyuan station in Ningxia Province are selected and added to the modeling process. Totally 25 stations in north parts of China are used to modify the weight factors (4 new selected stations, in addition to 21 stations in modeling in 2003). The drought index calculated by latest modified Palmer Drought Severity Model is compared with that modified in 2003 and the actual drought and wetting records in history. The result indicates that the latest modified Palmer Drought Severity Model can better evaluate the drought and wetting situations, especially in de scribing the extreme drought and extreme wet development processes, and can be better applied in most arid and semi arid regions in north parts of China. -
[1] Wayne C Palmer. Meteorological Drought. Weather Bureau Research Paper NO. 45, Weather Bureau, U S Department of Commerce, 1965. [2] Makra L Sz, Horvath R, Pongracz J Mika. Long term climate deviations: An alternative approach and application on the Palmer drought severity index in Hungary. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27 : 1063-1071. doi: 10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00142-0 [3] Dai A, Karl T R, Trenberth K E. Global variations in droughts and wet spells: 1900-1995. Geophys Res Lett, 1998, 25(17) : 3367-3370. doi: 10.1029/98GL52511 [4] Guttman N B. A sensitivity analysis of the Palmer hydrologic drought index. Water Resour Bull, 1991, 27: 797-807. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227929046_A_Sensitivity_Analysis_of_Palmer_Hydrologic_Drought_Index [5] Guttman N B. Comparing the Palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index. J Amer Water Resour Assoc, 1998, 34: 113-121. doi: 10.1111/jawr.1998.34.issue-1 [6] 范嘉泉, 郑剑非.帕尔默气象干旱研究方法介绍.气象科技, 1984, 1: 63-71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ198401017.htm [7] 杨扬, 安顺清, 刘巍巍, 等.帕尔默旱度指数方法在全国实时旱情监视中的应用.水科学进展, 2007, 18(1) : 52-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKXJ200701008.htm [8] 刘庚山, 郭安红, 安顺清, 等.帕默尔干旱指标及其应用研究进展.自然灾害学报, 2007, 13(4): 21-27. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH200404004.htm [9] 赵惠媛, 沈必成, 姜辉, 等.帕尔默气象干旱研究方法在松嫩平原西部的应用.黑龙江农业科学, 1996, (3): 30-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJN603.009.htm [10] 卫捷, 陶诗言, 张庆云.Palmer干旱指数在华北干旱分析中的应用.地理学报, 2003, 58(增刊): 91-99. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB2003S1010.htm [11] 卫捷, 马柱国. Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较.地理学报, 2003, 58(增刊): 117-124. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB2003S1013.htm [12] 王越, 江志红, 张强, 等.用Palmer湿润指数作西北地区东部冬小麦旱涝评估.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(3): 342-349. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080356&flag=1 [13] 安顺清, 邢久星.修正的帕尔默干旱指数及其应用.气象, 1985, 12: 17-19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX198512005.htm [14] 安顺清, 邢久星.帕尔默旱度模式的修正.气象科学研究院院刊, 1986, 1(1): 75-81. [15] 刘巍巍, 安顺清, 刘庚山, 等.帕尔默旱度模式的进一步修正.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(2): 207-216. [16] 张建伟, 申双和.旱地农田土壤水分的动态模拟.新疆气象, 1997, 20(3): 33-37. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJQX199703011.htm [17] 蒋俊明.土壤蒸发、蒸散模型的研究.四川林业科技, 1995, 16(4): 20-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCLK504.002.htm [18] 魏胜利.田间持水量的测定和旱情分析.水科学与工程技术, 2005, (增刊): 53-54. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBSD2005S1025.htm [19] 邓振镛, 方德彪, 仇化民.甘肃东部旱作区土壤水库贮水力的研究.应用气象学报, 1996, 7(2): 169-174. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960226&flag=1 [20] 邹立尧, 赵秀兰.黑龙江省农田土壤水分的时空分布规律.黑龙江气象, 2001, (3) : 24-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJQ200103011.htm [21] 安顺清, 刘庚山, 吕厚荃, 等.冬小麦底墒供水特征研究.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(增刊): 119-127. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2000S1015.htm -
下载:
图(1)
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 3028
- HTML全文浏览量: 617
- PDF下载量: 1360
- 被引次数: 0
