设为首页
加入收藏
北京市气温对电力负荷影响的计量经济分析
Econometric Analysis on Beijing Temperature Influence upon Electricity Load
-
摘要: 以温度派生变量度日指数为解释变量构建了气温与电力负荷的计量经济模型。模型证明了天气对电力负荷的季节性影响, 且影响显著。通过引入序列相关AR结构和解释变量的动态结构, 模型得到逐步优化, 调整的拟合优度达95%。为了检验模型的预测能力, 利用历史数据对其进行了评估, 评估结果表明模型有较好的中期电力负荷预测能力。该模型对电力企业电力调度、电力建设有较大的参考价值。Abstract: The variation of electricity load is influenced by the weather, especially the temperature. Relationship model between them is established by using of econometrics method, and its predictive power is assessed by forecasting a monthly and a quarterly load.The mean daily temperature from Beijing Weather Observatory and daily maximum electricity load from Beijing Electricity Company during 2002—2004 are collected to form the model. Because of the temperature's nonlinear affect on load, the heating degree days (HDD) and the cooling degree days (CDD), which are the derivation index of temperature, are used as explanatory variables to establish a concise linear model. Degree days index is defined analogically as the accumulated Celsius degrees between a threshold temperature and the daily mean temperature. The HDD is a good estimation of an accumulated cold during the cold season and the CDD estimates an accumulated warmth during the warm season. The 18 ℃ threshold temperature is chosen in Beijing.The development trend, the different influence on load of different month, different day (holiday and workday), as well as the lag-effect on load of HDD and CDD are fully considered in the model. The errors autoregressive structure is introduced. The test results and actual data have a good fitting degree, R2 is up to 95%, and DW is 2.The CDD has a stronger influence on electricity load than the HDD. If the CDD increases 1 ℃, the electricity load will increase 3%; the HDD increases 1 ℃, the load will only increase 0. 4%. CDD's lag-effect is also stronger than HDD's. The electricity load on holidays, such as Saturdays, Sundays, the May Day holiday and the National Day, is 3%—4% lower than workdays, in the Spring Festival, it is even lower. Assessment of its predictive power shows that it works good for the medium prediction of electricity load, systematic errors of seasonal forecasting is 5. 4% at 99. 7% confidence level.
-
Key words:
- cooling degree days;
- heating degree days;
- electricity load
-
图 2 2002-2004年北京市日平均气温与电力负荷 (去趋势) 散点图
Fig. 2 Scatter diagram of daily temperature and electricity load (detrend) of Beijing during 2002-2004
图 3 2002-2004年一周 (a) 及各月 (b) 平均电力负荷
Fig. 3 Weekly (a) and monthly (b) fluctuation of average electricity load during 2002-2004
图 4 2004年第4季度 (a) 及12月 (b) 电力负荷
Fig. 4 Electricity load of the 4th quarter (a) and December (b) in 2004
表 1 模型1、模型2、模型3的估计结果
Table 1 Result of model-1, model-2 and model-3
表 2 季度和月度预测误差
Table 2 Quarterly and monthly forecasting error
-
[1] Lotufo A D P, Minussi C R. Electric Power Systems Load Forecasting: A Survey. Paper BPT99-028-25 Accepted for Presentation at the IEEE Power Tech'99 Conference. Budapest, Hungary, 1999. [2] 张文哲, 陈刚.电力市场下负荷预测综述.渝西学院学报 (自然科学版), 2003, (3):71-74. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXXY200303020.htm [3] Kermanshahi B, Iwamiya H. Up to year 2020 load forecasting using neural nets. Electrical Power Energy Syst, 2000, 24: 789-797. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061501000862 [4] Ringwood J V, Bofell D, Murray F T. Forecasting electricity demand on short, medium and long time scales using neural networks. J Intell Rob Syst, 2001, 31:129-147. doi: 10.1023/A:1012046824237 [5] 艾名舜, 马红光, 刘遵雄.基于RBFNN的短期电力负荷混沌局域预测法.继电器, 2006, (14):21-23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDQW200614006.htm [6] 赵宇红, 唐耀庚, 张韵辉.基于神经网络和模糊理论的短期负荷预测.高电压技术, 2006, (5):45-47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDYJ200605031.htm [7] 陈春琴.数理统计分析在电力企业负荷预测中的应用.华东电力, 2006, (5):63-65. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDDL200605014.htm [8] Pardo A, Meneu V, Valor E. Temperature and seasonality influences on Spanish electricity load. Energy Econ, 2002, 24: 55-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00082-2 [9] 张晓峒.计量经济学基础.天津:南开大学出版社, 2001. [10] Li X, Sailor D J. Electricity use sensitivity to climate and climate change. World Resour Rev, 1995, 7(3):334-346. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/116281 [11] Wibig J. Heating Degree Days and Cooling Degree Days Variability in Lodz in the Period 1931-2000. Fifth International Conference on Urbun Climate. Lodz, Poland, 2003:471-474. [12] Byrd G P. An adjustment for the effects of observation time on mean temperature and degree-days computations. J Clim Appl Met, 1985, 24(8):870-874. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234524577_An_Adjustment_for_the_Effects_of_Observation_Time_on_Mean_Temperature_and_Degree-Day_Computations [13] 谢庄, 苏德斌, 虞海燕, 等.北京地区热度日和冷度日的变化特征.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(2):232-236. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070239&flag=1 [14] Lalas D P, Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, et al. Impacts of Environmental Restrictions on the Structure of the Electricity Sector. Technical Report Prepared by National Observatory of Athens for the Greek Public Power Corporation, Lofos Nimfon, Thission, 11810 Athens. 2003. [15] Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Georgopoulou E, et al. Models for mid-term electricity demand forecasting incorporating weather influences. Energy, 2006, 31:208-227. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.016 [16] Peirson J, Henley A. Electricity load and temperature:issues in dynamic specification.Energy Econ, 1994, 16(4):235-243. doi: 10.1016/0140-9883(94)90021-3 [17] Le Comte D, Warren H E. Modeling the impact of summer temperatures on national electricity consumption.J Appl Met, 1981, 20: 1415-1419. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1415:MTIOST>2.0.CO;2 -
下载:
图(4) / 表(2)
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 3245
- HTML全文浏览量: 728
- PDF下载量: 2558
- 被引次数: 0
