EOF迭代模型的月动力延伸预报产品释用方法
Application Method of Monthly Dynamics Extended-range Forecast Based on EOF Iteration Scheme
-
摘要: 以动力延伸预报产品为基础, 应用EOF迭代模型对河北省2005—2007年6—8月逐月降水量进行预测试验。经过详细分析不同相关区因子、截取特征向量的项数、EOF迭代次数和迭代误差对预测结果的影响, 提出在建立模型时应该尽可能选取与预测对象关系密切的相关区因子。随着迭代次数增加, 迭代误差逐渐减小, 但预测精度与迭代误差没有必然联系。试验结果表明:迭代次数不宜过多, 甚至不需要迭代, 当仅取前一项特征向量, 不进行迭代时, 月降水量预测值和实况值的符号一致率为0.63, PS评分为0.74。Abstract: Based on EOF iteration scheme model with dynamic extended range forecast products, experiment of precipitation prediction is done for 121 station of Hebei Province from June to August in 2005—2007. It is necessary to use 500 hPa correlation area in the EOF iteration scheme model in order to improve the prediction accuracy. Experiment in different correlation areas indicates that the model performs best when the critical correlation coefficient is 0.45, correlation area is of 90 grids. The average sign coincidence rate between predicted precipitation and observed precipitation is 0.54.When critical correlation coefficient is 0.45, grid number is 90 and iteration error is 0.05, let truncation order of eigenvector equal 1, 2, …, 11 and do experiment separately. The first two eigenvectors account for about 50% of total variance explained. When truncation order equal 1 and 2, average sign coincidence rate are 0.60 and 0.58. When truncation order is greater than 2, average sign coincidence rate decreases as truncation order increases slightly until stability in 0.54—0.52.When critical correlation coefficient is 0.45, grid number is 90 and truncation order of eigenvector is 4, let iteration number equal 0, 1, …, 19 do the prediction experiment separately.The experiment shows that iteration error decreases as iteration number increases, but the decrease rate is very different. As accuracy reaches 0.05, the fastest experiment requires only one times of iterative operator and the slowest one requires 15 times. The predicted result affected by iteration error is slight. To acquire good result, many times of iteration is unnecessary, usually no more than three times. When truncating the first eigenvector without iteration, the average sign coincidence rate of monthly precipitation prediction can reach 0.63 and operational scores PS can reach 0.74.
-
表 1 选取不同相关系数临界值的符号一致率
Table 1 Sign coincidence rate in different critical correlation coefficient
表 2 最佳预测结果出现的迭代次数、符号一致率、迭代误差
Table 2 Iteration number, sign coincidence rate and iteration error in best prediction
表 3 2005—2007年6—8月降水预测评分
Table 3 Score of precipitation from June to August during 2005—2007
-
[1] 李维京, 张培群, 李清泉.等.动力气候模式预测系统业务化及其应用.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(增刊): 1-10. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2005S1000.htm [2] 丁一汇, 李清泉, 李维京, 等.中国业务动力季节预报进展.气象学报, 2004, 62(5): 598-612. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200405007.htm [3] 李维京, 陈丽娟.动力延伸预报产品释用方法的研究.气象学报, 1999, 57(3): 338-344. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB903.007.htm [4] 陈丽娟, 李维京, 张培群, 等.降尺度技术在月降水预报中的应用.应用气象学报, 2003, 14(6): 648-655. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20030682&flag=1 [5] 江双武, 田红, 陈丽娟.动力延伸预报产品释用方法的改进试验.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(6): 779-786. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=200506101&flag=1 [6] 陈丽娟, 李维京.月动力延伸预报产品的评估和解释应用.应用气象学报, 1999, 10(4) : 486-490. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=199904101&flag=1 [7] 张立祥, 陈力强, 刘文明, 等.东北地区夏季月降水数值产品释用预报方法.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(3): 348-354. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX200003011.htm [8] 马振锋, 陈洪.T63月延伸预报在西南区域短期气候预测中的应用研究.应用气象学报, 1999, 10(3): 368-373. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990373&flag=1 [9] 张邦林, 丑纪范, 孙照渤.用前期大气环流预报中国夏季降水的EOF迭代方案.科学通报, 1991, 36(23): 1797-1798. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199123011.htm [10] 李跃清, 董文林.用多时次资料的EOF迭代温度长期预报.气象, 1995, 21(9): 30-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX509.006.htm [11] 黄嘉佑.气象统计分析与预报方法.北京:气象出版社, 2000. [12] 李栋梁, 姚辉.中国西北夏季降水量与500 hPa纬偏场的特征分析.气象, 1995, 21(11): 22-26. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX511.004.htm [13] 段旭, 尤卫红, 李跃清.多时次资料的EOF迭代在云南夏季气候预测中的应用.高原气象, 2001, 20(2): 220-223. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX200102017.htm [14] 张永领, 吴胜安, 丁裕国, 等. SVD迭代模型在夏季降水预测中的应用.气象学报, 2006, 64(1): 121-127. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200601011.htm [15] 陈桂英, 赵振国, 王绍武.短期气候预测评估方法和业务初估.应用气象学报, 1998, 9(2): 178-185. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19980225&flag=1