浙江省台风灾害影响评估模型

张永恒; 范广洲; 马清云; 李泽椿; 曹海维

浙江省台风灾害影响评估模型

1.
成都信息工程学院高原大气与环境研究中心, 成都 610225
2.
国家气象中心, 北京 100081
3.
北京市观象台, 北京 100089

资助项目:

国家科技支撑计划课题“亚洲台风-暴雨巨灾风险评估技术及应用研究” 2008BAC44B03

计量
- 摘要浏览量: 4157
- HTML全文浏览量: 797
- PDF下载量: 2229
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-11-06
- 修回日期: 2009-09-09
- 刊出日期: 2009-12-31

The Evaluation Model of Typhoon Disaster Influence on Zhejiang Province

1.
Center for Plateau Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Chengdu University of In formation Technology, Chengdu 610225
2.
National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081
3.
Beijing Weather Observatory, Beijing 100089

摘要

摘要: 选取2000-2006年影响浙江省的20个台风所造成的灾害进行分析, 采用模糊数学原理和方法建立评估模型, 在考虑台风本身自然灾变因素的基础上加入了致灾的社会、经济因素, 组合成10个灾害影响因子输入模型, 计算出台风综合评价指数, 并利用数理统计分析方法将台风灾后的死亡人数、受伤人数和直接经济损失折算成规范化指数---灾级指数, 用来表示实际灾情, 并客观地将两指数划分为特别重大、重大、较重、一般4个等级, 分别得到两指数各自的轻重灾害判据。对比分析表明:该灾害评估模型具有较高的拟合率, 全部个例的两指数同级率达到了90 %, 错报等级也仅差一级, 能够较好地评价和预测台风可能造成的损失程度, 将其应用到应急管理中, 可为台风防灾减灾工作提供决策支持。
- 台风灾害;
- 模糊数学;
- 评估模型
Abstract: Based on the unceasing increase of economy and continual development of society, the loss from typhoon disaster is getting more fierce and fatal. So the scientific and objective evaluation model of typhoon disaster is very important for recovery from the disaster. Historical research shows that most evaluation methods centralize elements of natural disaster change, but ignore crucial factors about society and economy.Taking the social and economic factors into account, the Fuzzy Mathematics method is applied to analyze the disaster damage caused by 20 typhoons that have influenced on Zhejiang Province during the period from 2000 to 2006. Ten disaster impact factors are selected as model input and an index of every typhoon disaster can be obtained using the method. Meanwhile, the concept of disaster grade in Feng Lihua's work is used to translate the casualty and direct loss of every typhoon disaster into a normal index by means of numerical statistical analysis. Losses of typhoon disasters are divided into four grades as extreme great, heavy, and general by the two indexes. Comparison result shows that for 90% of the cases, the two indexes are accordant while the discrepancy for the rest 10% of cases is only one grade. So the model established can reasonably evaluate the losses caused by typhoon disaster of different density. The model is feasible in beforehand and fast evaluation of typhoon disasters based on the weather forecast and observation data as well as the economic data. It can offer directorial gist for emergency management, and support decision-making for disaster recovery.
- typhoon disaster;
- fuzzy mathematics;
- evaluation model

HTML全文

图 1 2000-2006年影响浙江省的台风个例评价指数和灾级指数变化

Fig. 1 The variety of the disaster grade and evaluation index of every tropical cyclone influence on Zhejiang Province during 2000-2006

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各因子权重分配

Table 1 Weighting of various factors allocation

表 2 灾害损失、灾级指数与评价指数分级

Table 2 The classification of every disaster grade, loss and evaluation index

表 3 2000-2006年影响浙江省的台风个例评价指数与灾级指数的对比分析

Table 3 The comparison of disaster grade and evaluation index of every tropical cyclone influence on Zhejiang Province during 2000-2006

参考文献(18)

[1]	吕振平, 姚月伟. 浙江省台风灾害及应急机制建设. 灾害学, 2006, 21(3): 69-71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU200603014.htm
[2]	薛根元, 俞善贤, 何风翩, 等.云娜台风灾害特点与浙江省台风灾害初步研究.自然灾害学报, 2006, 15(4): 39-47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH200604007.htm
[3]	刘庭杰, 施能, 顾骏强.浙江省台风灾害的统计分析.灾害学, 2002, 17(4): 64-71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU200204013.htm
[4]	李春梅, 罗晓玲, 刘锦銮.层次分析法在热带气旋灾害影响评估模式中的应用. 热带气象学报, 2006, 22(3): 223-228. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX200603002.htm
[5]	卢峰本, 黄滢, 许文龙. 影响防城港市的热带气旋灾害评估方法. 广西气象, 2005, 26(2): 14-15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXQX200502003.htm
[6]	樊琦, 梁必骐. 热带气旋灾害经济损失的模糊数学评测. 气象科学, 2000, 20(3): 360-366. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKX200003015.htm
[7]	樊琦, 梁必骐. 热带气旋灾情的预测及评估. 地理学报, 2000, 55(增刊): 52-55. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB2000S1009.htm
[8]	冯利华.灾害损失的定量计算.灾害学, 1993, 8(2): 17-19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU199302003.htm
[9]	中国气象局.热带气旋年鉴.北京:气象出版社, 2000-2006.
[10]	浙江统计局. 浙江统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2000-2006.
[11]	曹祥村, 袁群哲, 杨继鉝, 等. 2005年登陆我国热带气旋特征分析.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3): 412-416. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070367&flag=1
[12]	陈联寿.热带气旋研究和业务预报技术的发展.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(6): 672-681. http://qk.cams.cma.gov.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=200606116&flag=1
[13]	Emanuel K.Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.Nature, 2005, 436: 686-688. doi: 10.1038/nature03906
[14]	彭祖赠, 孙韫玉. 模糊数学及其应用. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2002: 1-465.
[15]	贺仲雄. 模糊数学与应用. 天津: 天津科技出版社, 1988: 15-75.
[16]	周浩亮.模糊数学基本理论及其应用. 建井技术, 1994, (21): 70-80. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJJS4Z1.018.htm
[17]	梁必骐, 樊琦, 杨洁, 等. 热带气旋灾害的模糊数学评价. 热带气象学报, 1999, 15(4): 305-311. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX199904002.htm
[18]	李登峰, 程春田, 陈守煜.部分信息不完全的多目标决策方法. 控制与决策, 1998, 13(1): 83-86.