设为首页
加入收藏
中国4个地点地基与卫星臭氧总量长期观测比较
Long term Total Ozone Comparisons Between Space based and Ground based Observations at 4 Sites in China
-
摘要: 对我国河北香河、云南昆明、青海瓦里关及黑龙江龙凤山地基观测臭氧总量与不同时期、不同卫星反演的产品差别特点进行比较，评估地基和卫星观测臭氧总量数据的质量信息以及近30年来我国不同区域臭氧总量的变化趋势特征。结果表明：4个站点的地基与卫星观测臭氧总量的绝对和相对差别分别为-5~10 DU和-5%~4%；日平均相对差别基本上呈现随机分布特征。TOMS算法反演的卫星臭氧总量与地基差别总体上要优于与DOAS算法反演的同期产品。地基与卫星臭氧总量差别呈明显的区域特点，可能反映了卫星反演计算中所需的臭氧、温度垂直分布等初始条件的纬度分布差异对卫星产品精度的影响。在过去30年，4个站点的臭氧总量在经历1993年前的显著降低后于1995—1996年逐渐回升，而瓦里关站在2001年前后的回升更为明显。Abstract: The observed total ozone differences between ground based data and available satellite products over Xianghe, Kunming, Waliguan and Longfengshan are analyzed. The absolute differences of total ozone between space based and ground based observations are-5—10 DU. And the relatives differences (RD) is—5%—4%, fitting the normal distribution of 0.05 significance. Compared with the ground based observation, the precision of TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrophotometer) version total ozone is better than that of DOAS (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy). Total ozone RDs are statistically similar at Xianghe and Longfengshan where total ozone is high, while the similarity of RDs are also detected at low total ozone region Kunming and Waliguan. The regional similarities also indicate in the sensitivity validations of total ozone RDs to the SZA (solar zenith angle) and total ozone references. The integrated total ozone dataset with the ground based and TOMS as well as OMI observations in the 4 proxy sites also reflect the substantial depletion of global total ozone event around 1993. An eventual recover trend emerged in Xianghe, Kunming, and Longfengshan during 1995—1996, but the recover trend in Waliguan doesn't occur until 2001. The inter comparisons also reveal the quality information of ground based total ozone observations. For example, due to Brewer grating scratches in 2000—2006, total ozone observation from Longfengshan intends to be lower at high SZA conditions, which has been reflected in the RDs sensitivity validation to SZA. The increasing total ozone difference between Dobson#075 and OMI or SCIAMACHY products since 2007 needs further investigation.
-
图 1 Brewer #054和#076在1991-2008的校准记录
Fig. 1 Historical calibratio n record of Brewer #054 & #076 during 1991-2008
图 2 地基、星基臭氧总量月平均相对差别变化
Fig. 2 The monthly average of total ozone relative differences between ground and space-based observ ations
图 3 地基、星基臭氧总量相对差别变化对太阳天顶角的依赖性检验
Fig. 3 The sensitivity tests of total ozone relative diffe rences between ground and space-based observ ations to solar zenith angle
图 4 地基、星基臭氧总量相对差别变化对臭氧总量 (地基观测为基准) 的依赖性检验
Fig. 4 The sensitivity tests of total ozone relative differences between ground and space-based observ ations to total ozone reference
图 5 地基观测、TOMS系列卫星和地基与TOMS融合的3种数据显示臭氧总量自1978年的变化趋势
Fig. 5 The total ozone trends since 1978 from 3 kinds data sets:ground-based, TOMS and integ rated of ground-based and TOMS observations
表 1 臭氧总量的地基与星基比较
Table 1 Total O3 comparisons between ground-based and space observations
表 2 地基与卫星臭氧总量相对差别正态分布特征的检验
Table 2 Normal distribution test for the relative differrences of total ozone between space and ground-based observations
表 3 卫星臭氧总量与地基臭氧总量线性拟合参数比较
Table 3 The parameters of linear fitting between total ozone of satellite and ground-based observations
-
[1] Staehelin J, Kerr J, Evans R, et al.Comparison of Total Ozone Measurements of Dobson and Brewer Spectrophotomters and Recommended Transfer Functions.GAW/WM0 Report Series, NO.149, WMO/TD-No.1214, Geneva:WMO, 2003. [2] Vanicek K.Differences between ground Dobson, Brewer and satellite TOMS-8, GOME-WFDOAS total ozone observations at Hradec Kralove, Czech.Atmos Chem Phys, 2006, 6:5163-5171. [3] Fioletov V, Kerr J, Hare E, et al.An assessment of the world ground-based total ozone network performance from the comparison with satellite data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104 :1737-1748, doi: 10.1029/1998JD100046. [4] Bramstedt K, Gleason J, Loyola D, et al.Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996-2000.Atmos Chem Phys, 2002, 2 :1131-1157. doi: 10.5194/acpd-2-1131-2002 [5] 魏鼎文, 赵廷亮, 秦芳, 等.中国北京和昆明地区大气臭氧层异常变化.科学通报, 1994, 39(16):1509-1511. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199416019.htm [6] 郑向东.云对中国区域卫星观测臭氧总量精度影响的检验分析.大气科学, 2008, 32(6):1431-1444. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200806018.htm [7] 张毅平, 周秀骥, 薛庆瑜.Brewer光谱仪遥感大气臭氧垂直廓线的研究.应用气象学报, 1994, 5(4):444-453. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19940467&flag=1 [8] 郑向东, 汤洁, 李维亮, 等.拉萨地区1998年夏季臭氧总量及垂直廓线的观测研究.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(2):173-179. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000226&flag=1 [9] Bhartia P K, Wellemeyer C.TOMS Version 8 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, http:∥toms.gsfc.nasa.gov, 2004 :11-24. [10] Labow G J, McPeters R D, Bhartia P K.A comparison of TOMS & SBUV Version 8 Total Column Ozone Data With Data from Ground Stations.University of Athens, 2004 :123-124. [11] Valks P, Veefkind J P, de Haan J F, et al.TOGOMI Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document, TOGOMI/ KNMI/ATBD/001, 2003. [12] Veefkind J P, de Haan J F, Brinksma E J, et al.Total ozone from the ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) using the DOAS technique.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(5):1239-1244. [13] Allen D R, Reck R A.Daily variations in TOMS total ozone date, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1996, 102(12):13603-13608. [14] 任芝花, 冯明农, 张洪政, 等.自动与人工观测降雨量的差异及相关性.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3):358-364. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070358&flag=1 [15] McPeters R D, Labow G J.An assessment of the accuracy of 14.5 years of Nimbus 7 TOMS Version 7 ozone data by comparison with the Dobson network.Geophysical Research Letters, 1996, 23 :3695-3698. doi: 10.1029/96GL03539 [16] Lambert J C, Roozendael M V, Simon P C, et al.Combined characterization of GoME and TOMS total ozone measurements from space using ground-based observations from the NDSC.Advances in Space Research, 2000, 26 :1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1177(00)00178-2 [17] Meghan L M, Rao S T, Zurbenko l G.Evaluating the effectiveness of ozone management effort in the presence of meteorological variability.Journal of the Air And Waste Management Association, 1998, 48 :201-215. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1998.10463673 [18] Eskridge R E, Ku J Y, Rao S T, et al.Separating different scales of motion in time series of meteorological variables.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1997, 78(7):1473-1483. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1473:SDSOMI>2.0.CO;2 [19] Casale G R, Meloni D, Miano S, et al.Solar UV-B irradiance and total ozone in Italy:Fluctuations and trends.Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(D4):4895-4901. doi: 10.1029/1999JD900303 [20] Reinsel G C, Miller A J, et al.Weatherhead E C, Trend analysis of total ozone data for turnaround and dynamicalcontributions, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110, D16306, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004662 [21] Kerr J B.New methodology for deriving total ozone and other atmospheric variables from Brewer spectrophotometer direct sun spectra.Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, 107(D23), 4731, doi: 1029/2001JD001227. [22] Ken Lamb, China Brewer # 076 Calibrations Report in 2002, 2004 and 2006, http:∥www.ios.ca, 2009. -
下载:
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 4341
- HTML全文浏览量: 944
- PDF下载量: 2454
- 被引次数: 0
