GTS的温盐资料在BCC_GODAS中的同化结果分析

刘向文; 李维京; 吴统文; 肖贤俊

GTS的温盐资料在BCC_GODAS中的同化结果分析

国家气候中心中国气象局气候研究开放实验室, 北京 100081

资助项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目 2006CB403606

中国气象局“风云气象卫星遥感开发与应用"项目 FiDAF-2-05

财政部行业专项 GYHY200706005

计量
- 摘要浏览量: 3522
- HTML全文浏览量: 950
- PDF下载量: 1335
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2009-08-11
- 修回日期: 2010-07-02
- 刊出日期: 2010-10-31

The Assimilation Results of Ocean Temperature and Salinity Data from GTS in BCC_GODAS 2.0

Laboratory for Climate Studies, National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081

摘要

摘要: 分析了从GTS（全球无线通讯系统）获得的2002—2007年海洋温盐观测资料在国家气候中心第2代全球海洋资料同化系统（BCC_GODAS 2.0）中的同化结果。与SODA (简易海洋同化数据) 资料的比较表明:GTS中的海洋温盐资料同化对模式温盐场的改进之处主要表现在混合层暖区的范围和中心强度、温跃层中温度槽脊的深度、温跃层附近的温度梯度以及盐度高、低值区的范围和中心强度等方面，同化后全球温盐场的均方根误差得到一定程度的降低。挑选位于不同海区的单点温盐廓线与ARGO (地转海洋学实时观测阵) 观测作了进一步比较，结果表明：大多数情况下，同化后温盐廓线的均方根误差得到明显降低，模拟的温盐垂向分布特征也更为准确。与TAO (热带大气海洋观测网) 资料的比较也同样表明:同化后的温盐场特征会得到一定程度改善。
- GTS;
- BCC_GODAS;
- 温度;
- 盐度;
- 剖面;
- 廓线
Abstract: Ocean temperature and salinity observations data from GTS (Global Telecommunication System) are assimilated in second generation global ocean data assimilation system of Beijing Climate Center (BCC_GODAS 2.0) and the results are analyzed. First, the comparison with SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation) reveals the vertical distribution features of root mean square error (RMSE) of global temperature and salinity in model and assimilation system. The analysis shows that, for the RMSE of temperature with assimilation, compared with the results without assimilation, it has a slight decline with a range of 0—0.3 ℃ in the sea surface layer, and an obvious descent with a range of 0.1—0.7 ℃ in depth from about 100 m to deep layer, but has no obvious variation in depth from the middle and lower mixed layer to about 100 m. For the RMSE of salinity after assimilation, it has a descent with a range of 0—0.2 psu in depth from ocean surface to deep layer. Second, further comparison is made for some vertical cross sections, including the zonal cross section along equator, the meridional cross section along 165°E in Pacific Ocean, the meridional cross section along 30°W in Atlantic Ocean, the longitudinal cross section along 90°E in Indian Ocean. The results show that, generally speaking, the GTS data assimilation improves the temperature and salinity simulation in many aspects including the extension and central intensity of warm sector in mixed layer, the depth of temperature ridge and trough in thermocline, the temperature gradient near thermocline, the extension and central intensity of high and low salinity sector, and so on. Moreover, the further comparison with some ARGO (Array for Real time Geostrophic Oceanography) observation indicates that, in most cases, the RMSE of temperature and salinity profiles has an obvious descent after assimilation, leading to more accurate vertical distribution features of temperature and salinity simulations. For selected single point profiles in different ocean areas in January, after assimilation, the RMSE of temperature and salinity decrease by 0.49 ℃ and 0.19 psu, respectively; for selected profiles in July, the descent of RMSE of temperature and salinity is 0.87 ℃ and 0.18 psu, respectively. The comparison with TAO (Tropical Atmosphere Ocean) data also shows that the assimilation can improve the temperature and salinity features to a certain extent. The BCC_GODAS 2.0 has superiority in some degree in ocean data assimilation, however, there is still some deficiency, and the assimilation effect is not very good in some areas or periods, which may be induced by lack of observations, uncertainties of the data, the imperfection of assimilation system, as well as the simulation capability of model, and so on.
- GTS;
- BCC_GODAS;
- temperature;
- salinity;
- section;
- profile

HTML全文

图 1 2002—2007年6年平均的全球温度､盐度均方根误差的廓线分布 (实线为BCC_GODAS同化结果, 虚线为MOM4模拟)

Fig. 1 The profiles of 6-year averaged global temperature and salinity RMSE during 2002—2007 (solid line: assimilated by BCC_GODAS; dashed line:simulated by MOM4)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 2002—2007年7月温度 (单位:℃)､盐度 (单位:psu) 场沿赤道的深度-纬向剖面特征

Fig. 2 The depth-zone cross section of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields along equator in July during 2002—2007

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 2002—2007年7月温度 (单位:℃)､盐度 (单位:psu) 场沿165°E的深度-经向剖面特征

Fig. 3 The depth-meridian cross section of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields along 165°E in July during 2002—2007

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 同图 3, 但是针对90°E剖面

Fig. 4 The same as in Fig. 3, but for the section along 90°E

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 同图 3, 但是针对30°W剖面

Fig. 5 The same as in Fig. 3, but for the section along 30°W

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 2007年1月和7月的模式 (MOM4)､同化结果 (BCC_GODAS) 及ARGO温盐廓线的比较

Fig. 6 The comparison of temperature and salinity profiles among model results (MOM4), assimilation results (BCC_GODAS), and ARGO observations in January and July of 2007

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 2002年1月—2007年12月的模式及同化结果的温度场 (单位:℃)､盐度场 (单位:psu) 与TAO资料的比较

Fig. 7 The comparison of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields among MOM4, BCC_GODAS and TAO from January 2002 to December 2007

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 模式和同化结果中部分温盐廓线的均方根误差

Table 1 The RMSE of some temperature and salinity profiles in model and assimilation results

参考文献(17)

[1]	刘益民, 李维京, 张培群. 国家气候中心全球海洋资料四维同化系统及其在热带太平洋的初步化结果分析. 海洋学报, 2005, 27(1):27-35. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEAC200501003.htm
[2]	Liu Yimin, Zhang Renhe, Yin Yonghong, etal. The applica-tion of ARGO data to the global ocean data assimilation oper-ational system of NCC. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2005, 29(3):355-365.
[3]	张人禾, 殷永红, 李清泉, 等. 利用ARGO 资料改进ENSO和我国夏季降水气候预测. 应用气象学报, 2006, 17(5):538-547. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060593&flag=1
[4]	张莉, 丁一汇. 全球海气耦合模式对我国极端强降水模拟检验. 应用气象学报, 2008, 19(6):760-769. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080616&flag=1
[5]	杨萍, 刘伟东, 王启光, 等. 近40年我国极端温度变化趋势和季节特征. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21(1):29-36. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20100104&flag=1
[6]	Zhu J, Zhou G Q, Yan C X, etal. A three-dimen sional vari-ational ocean data assimilation system:Scheme and prelimi-nary results. Science in China(SeriesD), 2006, 49(12):1212-1222.
[7]	Xiao Xianjun, Wang Dongxiao, Yan Changxiang, etal. E-valuation of a 3DVAR system for the South China Sea. Pro-gressin Natural Science, 2008, 18(5):547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2007.12.007
[8]	朱江, 周广庆, 闫长香, 等. 一个三维变分海洋资料同化系统的设计和初步应用. 中国科学(D 辑), 2007, 37(2):261-271. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200702013.htm
[9]	肖贤俊, 王东晓, 闫长香, 等. 南海三维变分海洋同化模式及其验证. 自然科学进展, 2007, 17(3):353-361. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKJZ200703010.htm
[10]	Hayden C M, Purser R J. Three-dimensional Recursive Filter Objective Analysis of Meteorologcial Fields ∥ Preprint, Eighth Conf on Numerical Weather Prediction. Baltimore, MD, Amer Meteor Soc, 1988:185-190.
[11]	Hayden C M, Purser R J. Recursive filter objective analysis of meteorological field: Applicationto NESDIS operational processing. J Appl Meteor, 1995, 34:3-15. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450-34.1.3
[12]	Troccoli A, Haines K. Use of temperature-salinity relation in a data assimilation context. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1999, 16(12):2011-2025. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<2011:UOTTSR>2.0.CO;2
[13]	Yan C, Zhu J, Li R, etal. Roles of vertical correlations of background error and T-Srelations in estimation of tempera-ture and salinity profiles from sea surface dynamic height. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: C08010, doi: 10. 1029/2003JC002224.
[14]	Zhu J, Yan C X. Nonlinear balance constraints in 3DVAR data assimilation. Science in China(SeriesD), 2006, 49(3):331-336. doi: 10.1007/s11430-006-0331-7
[15]	Nocedal J. Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Math Comput, 1980, 35:773-782. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572855-7
[16]	Fujii Y, Kamachi M. Nonlinear preconditioned descentmeth-ods without inversion of a first-guess covariational analyses. Tellus (Series A), 2003, 55:522-543.
[17]	Carton J, Giese B. Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA)reanalysis effort. CLIVER Workshop on Ocean Reanalysis. 2004.