留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

对流层气溶胶的直接气候效应对平流层的影响

宋刘明 刘煜 朱彬 李维亮

宋刘明, 刘煜, 朱彬, 等. 对流层气溶胶的直接气候效应对平流层的影响. 应用气象学报, 2014, 25(1): 83-94..
引用本文: 宋刘明, 刘煜, 朱彬, 等. 对流层气溶胶的直接气候效应对平流层的影响. 应用气象学报, 2014, 25(1): 83-94.
Song Liuming, Liu Yu, Zhu Bin, et al. Direct effects of tropospheric aerosols on stratospheric climate. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2014, 25(1): 83-94.
Citation: Song Liuming, Liu Yu, Zhu Bin, et al. Direct effects of tropospheric aerosols on stratospheric climate. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2014, 25(1): 83-94.

对流层气溶胶的直接气候效应对平流层的影响

资助项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 40875078

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目 2010CB428605

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目 2011CB403406

详细信息
    通信作者:

    刘煜, email: liuyu@cams.cma.gov.cn

Direct Effects of Tropospheric Aerosols on Stratospheric Climate

  • 摘要: 通过WACCM-3模式中气溶胶光学厚度与卫星资料的对比发现,模式可以很好地再现全球气溶胶的主要分布特征,但在一些区域还存在数值上的差异。利用数值试验研究对流层气溶胶的直接气候效应对平流层气候的影响,结果表明:对流层气溶胶对平流层气候有明显影响,平流层化学过程在这一影响中起重要作用,而对流层气溶胶对平流层辐射的影响不是其直接气候效应对平流层影响的主要原因。其机制可能是对流层气溶胶改变对流层的辐射平衡,影响对流层的温度和大气环流,进而影响行星波的上传,使得平流层气候发生变化;影响区域主要位于高纬度和极地地区,南半球的变化比北半球大,温度变化最大达10 K,纬向风变化最大可达12 m/s,臭氧体积分数最多减少0.8×10-6
  • 图  1  EXP3与EXP4大气层顶短波净辐射通量、地表短波净辐射通量和晴空地表短波净辐射通量差值

    Fig. 1  The difference of mean net short-wave radiative flux, surface net short-wave radiative flux, surface net short-wave radiative flux with clear sky between EXP3 and EXP4

    图  2  EXP1与EXP2多年平均值的温度差 (阴影) 和纬向风场之差 (等值线, 单位:m·s-1)

    Fig. 2  The difference of mean temperature (shaded) and zonal wind (contour, unit:m·s-1) between EXP1 and EXP2

    图  3  EXP1与EXP2多年平均值的臭氧体积混合比之差

    Fig. 3  The difference of mean O3 volumetric mixture ratio between EXP1 and EXP2

    图  4  EXP2 EP通量多年平均值及EXP1与EXP2 EP通量多年平均值之差

    Fig. 4  The mean EP flux from EXP2 and its difference between EXP1 and EXP2

    图  5  EXP3与EXP4多年平均值的温度差 (阴影) 和纬向风场之差 (等值线, 单位:m·s-1)

    Fig. 5  The difference of mean temperature (shaded) and zonal wind (contour, unit:m·s-1) between EXP3 and EXP4

    图  6  EXP1与EXP2温度差和纬向风场之差与EXP3与EXP4温度差 (阴影) 和纬向风场之差的差异 (等值线,单位:m·s-1)

    Fig. 6  The difference of mean temperature (shaded) and zonal wind (contour, unit:m·s-1) between experiment group A and B

    图  7  EXP3与EXP4的短波净辐射加热率的变化 (等值线) 和长波净辐射加热率的变化 (填色)(单位:10-2 K·d-1)

    Fig. 7  The difference of mean net short-wave radiative heating rate (contour) and net long-wave radiative heating rate (shaded) between EXP3 and EXP4(unit:10-2 K·d-1)

    表  1  EXP1和EXP2在40°~80°S及40°~80°N 100 hPa高度上经向热通量 (单位:K·m·s-1)

    Table  1  Meridional horizontal eddy heat flux (unit:K·m·s-1) at 100 hPa averaged over 40°—80°S and 40°—80°N

    月份 北半球经向热通量 南半球经向热通量
    EXP1 EXP2 EXP1 EXP2
    1 4.96 5.54 1.62 2.1
    4 2.42 1.69 0.9 1.02
    7 2.1 2.06 3.29 4.1
    10 0.99 0.68 0.94 1.29
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Alley R, Berntsen T, Bindoff N L.Climate Change 2007—The Physical Science Basis.Working Group Ⅰ Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2007:1-1009.
    [2] Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, et al.Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing.Climate Change 2007:Working Group Ⅰ Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2007:129-234.
    [3] Lau K, Kim M, Kim K.Asian summer monsoon anomalies induced by aerosol direct forcing:The role of the Tibetan Plateau. Climate Dynamics, 2006, 26:855-864. doi:  10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z
    [4] Liu Y, Sun J, Yang B.The effects of black carbon and sulphate aerosols in China regions on East Asia monsoons. Tellus B, 2009, 61:642-656. doi:  10.1111/teb.2009.61.issue-4
    [5] 孙家仁, 刘煜.中国区域气溶胶对东亚夏季风的可能影响 (Ⅰ):硫酸盐气溶胶的影响.气候变化研究进展, 2008, 4(2):111-116. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHBH200802015.htm
    [6] 孙家仁, 刘煜.中国区域气溶胶对东亚夏季风的可能影响 (Ⅱ):黑碳气溶胶及其与硫酸盐气溶胶的综合影响.气候变化研究进展, 2008, 4(3):161-166. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHBH200803008.htm
    [7] 赵春生, 彭大勇, 段英.海盐气溶胶和硫酸盐气溶胶在云微物理过程中的作用.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(4):417-425. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050452&flag=1
    [8] 田华, 马建中, 李维亮, 等.中国中东部地区硫酸盐气溶胶直接辐射强迫及气候效应的数值模拟.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(3):322-333. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20050307
    [9] 李鑫, 刘煜.CAM5模式中两气溶胶模块的评估.应用气象学报, 2013, 24(1):75-86. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20130108
    [10] 胡永云, 夏炎, 高梅, 等.21世纪平流层温度变化和臭氧恢复.气象学报, 2008, 66(6):880-891. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2008.080
    [11] 陈文, 黄荣辉.北半球冬季准定常行星波的三维传播及其年际变化.大气科学, 2005, 29(1):137-146. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200501015.htm
    [12] 熊光明, 陈权亮, 魏麟骁, 等.平流层极涡偏移对我国冬季降水的影响.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(6):683-690. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20120605
    [13] 胡永云, 朱金奎, 刘骥平.1979年以来南极平流层冬季变暖.气象学报, 2007, 65(5):773-783. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2007.073
    [14] 邓淑梅, 陈月娟, 陈权亮, 等.平流层爆发性增温期间行星波的活动.大气科学, 2006, 30(6):1236-1248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200606017.htm
    [15] 陆春晖, 刘毅, 陈月娟, 等.2003—2004年冬季平流层爆发性增温动力诊断分析.大气科学, 2009, 33(4):726-736. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200904008.htm
    [16] 胡永云.关于平流层异常影响对流层天气系统的研究进展.地球科学进展, 2006, 21(7):713-720. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ200607008.htm
    [17] 曲维政, 刘应辰, 黄菲, 等.平流层火山气溶胶时空传播规律及其气候效应.应用气象学报, 2010, 24(5):627-631. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20100513
    [18] Shu J, Tian W, Austin J, et al.Effects of sea surface temperature and greenhouse gas changes on the transport between the stratosphere and troposphere. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116:D02124, doi: 10.1029/2010JD014520.
    [19] Gerfinkel C, Hartmann D.Effects of the El Nio-Southern Oscillation and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation on polar temperature in the stratosphere. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112:D19112, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008481.
    [20] Kodama C, Iwasaki T, Shibata K, et al.Changes in the stratosphere mean meridional circulation due to increased CO2:Radiation-and sea surface temperature-induced effects. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112:D16103, doi: 10.1029/2006JD008219.
    [21] Xie F, Tian W, Chipperfield M P.Radiative effect of ozone change on stratosphere-troposphere exchange. J Geophys Res, 2007, 113, D00B09, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009829.
    [22] Lin S J.A vertically Lagrangian finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon Wea Rev, 2004, 132(10):2293-2307. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2293:AVLFDC>2.0.CO;2
    [23] Kinnison D E, Brasseur G P, Walters S, et al.Sensitivity of chemical tracers to meteorological parameters in the MOZART-3 chemical transport model. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112:D20302, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007879.
    [24] Fomichev V, Forster P, Cagnazzo C, et al.SPARC Report on the Evaluation of Chemistry Climate Models:Chapter 3 Radiation.2010.
    [25] Butchart N, Charlton-Perez A J, Cionni I, et al.SPARC Rep-ort on the Evaluation of Chemistry Climate Models.SPARC Report No.5, WCRP-132, WMO/TD No.1526, 2010.
    [26] Limpasuvan V, Richter J H, Orsolini Y J, et al.The roles of planetary and gravity waves during a major stratospheric sudden warming as characterized in WACCM. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2011, 78:84-98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235751567_The_roles_of_planetary_and_gravity_waves_during_a_major_stratospheric_sudden_warming_as_characterized_in_WACCM
    [27] Rasch P J, Mahowald N M, Eaton B E.Representations of transport, convection, and the hydrologic cycle in chemical transport models:Implications for the modeling of short-lived and soluble species. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102, 28:127-138. http://www.academia.edu/5214713/Representations_of_transport_convection_and_the_hydrologic_cycle_in_chemical_transport_models_Implications_for_the_modeling_of_short-lived_and_soluble_species
    [28] Stowe L L, A M, Singh R R.Development, validation, and potential enhancements to the second-generation operational aerosol product at the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102, 16:889-910. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4699718_Development_Validation_and_Potential_Enhancements_to_the_Second-Generation_Operational_Aerosol_Product_at_the_National_Environmental_Satellite_Data_and_Information_Service_of_the_National_Oceanic_and_
    [29] Collins W D, Rasch P J, Eaton B E, et al.Simulating aerosols using a chemical transport model with assimilation of satellite aerosol retrievals:Methodology for INDOEX. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106:7313-7336. doi:  10.1029/2000JD900507
    [30] Collins W D, Rasch P J, Eaton B E, et al.Simulation of aerosol distributions and radiative forcing for INDOEX:Regional climate impacts. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107(D19), 8028, doi: 10.1029/2000JD000032.
    [31] Collins W D, Rasch P J, Boville B A, et al.Descripition of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.0).NCAR Tech, Note NCAR TN-464+STR, 2004.
    [32] 王志立. 典型种类气溶胶的辐射强迫及其气候效应的模拟研究. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2011.
    [33] Dickinson R E.Planetary Rossby waves propagating vertically through weak westerly wind wave guides. J Atmos Sci, 1968, 25:984-1002. doi:  10.1175/1520-0469(1968)025<0984:PRWPVT>2.0.CO;2
    [34] Hardiman S C, Butchart N, Haynes P H, et al.A note on forced versus internal variability of the stratosphere. Geophys Res Lett, 2007, 34, L12803, doi: 10.1029/2007GL029726.
    [35] Eyring V, Butchart N, Waugh D W, et al.Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111:D22308, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007327.
    [36] Andrews D G, McIntyre M E.Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical shear:The generalized Eliassen-Palm relation and the mean zonal acceleration. J Atmos Sci, 1976, 33(11):2031-2048. doi:  10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2031:PWIHAV>2.0.CO;2
    [37] Charney J G, Drazin P G.Propagation of planetary-scale disturbance from the lower into the upper atmosphere. J Geophys Res, 1961, 66:83-109. doi:  10.1029/JZ066i001p00083
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(1)
计量
  • 摘要浏览量:  3092
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1135
  • PDF下载量:  813
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-04-15
  • 修回日期:  2013-10-29
  • 刊出日期:  2014-01-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回