设为首页
加入收藏
Impact Evaluation for Replacement of Temperature-humidity Sensor of Automatic Weather Station
-
摘要: 选取湖北省自动观测记录较长的38个站作为被检站，每个被检站选取3个邻近站，统计相对湿度、水汽压序列与邻近站的相关系数、平均值及方差变化情况，分析由人工观测改变为自动气象站观测后，两者存在的差异，并对其中4个国家基准气候站2003—2011年自动观测和同期人工观测进行对比，得到这4个站9年内每次更换温湿度传感器对相对湿度、水汽压记录的影响情况。结果表明：对比自动观测与人工观测两个序列，被检站与对应邻近站的相对湿度、水汽压的相关系数呈减小趋势，两种观测差值的平均值和方差差异显著；温湿度传感器的更换易产生相对湿度和水汽压记录的跳变；温湿度传感器的检定示值误差是加剧自动观测与人工观测序列显著差异的重要因素；改进观测方法，完善自动气象站检定规程，是自动观测与人工观测序列均一性的重要保证。Abstract: To discuss the differences between automatic and manual observations for relative humidity and water vapor pressure, some comparative researches are implemented, analyzing the correlation coefficient, mean and variance between 38 long-time automatic observation meteorological stations and their adjacent stations in Hubei Province. Furthermore, based on the automatic and manual observations of four national reference climatological stations where the temperature-humidity sensors have been replaced 28 times from 2003 to 2011, impacts on relative humidity and water vapor pressure measurements are studied.The correlation coefficients for relative humidity, water vapor pressure between the checked station and its adjacent stations show a decreasing trend when mannual observation is replaced by automatic observation, the mean and variance for relative humidity and water vapour pressure are also obviously different, and these differences may be caused by the change of observation method.The relative humidity and water vapour pressure records jump caused by replacement of the temperature-humidity sensor appears in the ratio of 64%. The average relative humidity record jump is 3.4%, and the maximum reaches 8.5%, while the average for water vapor pressure is 0.74 hPa, and the maximum is up to 1.93 hPa.The main cause for such difference appearing at the same station as described above is that calibration error of indication, for old temperature-humidity sensor is much different from the new one when replacing. So improving the method of observation and perfecting the verification procedure of automatic weather station are vary important to ensure the homogeneity of data.Therefore, it suggests choosing the temperature-humidity sensor whose calibration error is smaller, and an error calibration module should be added to the data processing software or operational software of automatic weather stations.
-
图 1 被检站与对应邻近站人工观测与自动观测序列相关系数差值
Fig. 1 The correlation coefficient difference of checked stations and their adjacent stations between manual and automatic observed sequences
图 2 2004—2007年麻城站与黄冈站人工观测水汽压月距平差值分布
Fig. 2 The monthly anomaly difference of the manual observed water vapor pressure between Macheng Station and Huanggang Station during 2004—2007
图 3 2004—2007年麻城站自动观测与人工观测水汽压月距平差值分布
Fig. 3 The monthly anomaly difference of water vapor pressure between the automatic and manual observation at Macheng Station during 2004—2007
图 4 1991—2012年仙桃站与邻近站相对湿度、水汽压月距平差值分布
Fig. 4 The monthly anomaly difference of water pressure and relative humidity between Xiantao Station and its adjacent stations during 1991—2012
图 5 2006年7月—2007年7月钟祥站相对湿度日平均差值变化
Fig. 5 The daily change of relative humidity on average difference at Zhongxiang Staion from July 2006 to July 2007
图 6 2006年7月—2007年7月钟祥站水汽压日平均差值变化
Fig. 6 The daily change of water vapor pressure on average difference at Zhongxiang Sation from July 2006 to July 2007
表 1 相对湿度、水汽压未通过显著性检验的站数
Table 1 The number of stations of relative humidity, water vapor pressure failed to pass the significant test
要素 单站序列 与邻近站差值序列 平均值 方差 平均值 方差 相对湿度 4 0 29 35 水汽压 22 17 28 37 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 更换温湿度传感器引起相对湿度和水汽压记录的跳变量
Table 2 The jumping value of relative humidity and water vapor pressure caused by the replacement of temperature-humidity sensor
站名 更换时间 相对湿度跳变量/% 水汽压跳变量/hPa 郧西站 2007-06-28 5.4 1.88 2007-07-25 0.0 0.55 2009-06-28 3.2 1.36 2011-06-21 5.0 1.52 恩施站 2003-03-18 1.1 0.07 2003-10-27 8.5 1.42 2004-04-15 1.8 0.02 2006-10-31 4.9 0.51 2007-02-09 1.7 0.14 2007-05-15 0.6 0.09 2007-06-18 0.8 0.37 2009-02-16 4.4 1.00 2009-05-18 1.8 0.06 2010-02-03 2.0 0.08 2011-05-17 3.0 0.98 钟祥站 2004-11-06 6.7 1.18 2006-11-04 4.5 1.16 2006-12-27 7.3 0.75 2007-06-14 2.2 0.78 2008-10-28 1.6 0.34 2009-03-26 5.8 0.68 2011-12-08 2.8 0.26 麻城站 2005-05-13 6.8 1.93 2006-08-30 0.1 0.52 2007-04-21 1.0 0.12 2009-04-21 4.0 0.68 2010-07-23 4.6 1.70 2011-04-15 2.6 0.64
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Wendland W M, Armstrong W.Comparison of maximum-minimum resistance and liquid-in-glass thermometer records.Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1993, 10:233-237. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1993)010<0233:COMRAL>2.0.CO;2 [2] World Meteorological Organization. Guidelines on Quality Control Procedures for Data from Automatic Weather Stations.CBS/OPAG-IOS/ET AWS-3/Doc 4(1), 2004. https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/OSY/Meetings/ET-AWS3/Doc4(1).pdf [3] 任芝花, 余予, 邹凤玲, 等.部分地面要素历史基础气象资料质量检测.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(6):739-747. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20120611 [4] 刘小宁, 鞠晓慧, 范邵华.空间回归检验方法在气象资料质量检验中的应用.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(1):37-42. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20060106 [5] 王新华, 罗四维, 刘小宁, 等.国家级地面自动站A文件质量控制方法及软件开发.气象, 2006, 32(3):107-112. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2006.03.017 [6] 王海军, 杨志彪, 杨代才, 等.自动气象站实时资料自动质量控制方法及其应用.气象, 2007, 33(10):102-109. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2007.10.015 [7] 胡玉峰.自动与人工观测数据的差异.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(6):719-726. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040689&flag=1 [8] 王颖, 刘小宁, 鞠晓慧.自动观测与人工观测差异的初步分析.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(6):849-855. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.200706128 [9] 杨萍, 刘伟东, 仲跻芹, 等.北京地区自动气象站气温观测资料的质量评估.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(6):706-715. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20110608 [10] 王宝鉴, 陈旭辉, 陶健红, 等.兰州CAWS600-R自动站与人工观测资料对比分析.气象科技, 2004, 32(4):281-286. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200404019.htm [11] 余君, 牟容.自动站与人工站相对湿度观测结果的差异及原因分析.气象, 2008, 34(12):96-102. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2008.12.013 [12] 王海军, 蒲晓勇, 杨志彪, 等.影响人工站与自动站水汽压差值原因探究.气象科技, 2012, 40(1):25-30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ201201007.htm [13] 黄嘉佑.气象统计分析与预报方法 (第三版).北京:气象出版社, 2004:20-23. [14] 朱乐坤, 郑丽春.自动气象站各要素传感器检定结果的不确定度分析.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(5):635-642. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20060507 [15] 中国气象局.地面气象观测规范.北京:气象出版社, 2003. -
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 3194
- HTML全文浏览量: 972
- PDF下载量: 1186
- 被引次数: 0
