设为首页
加入收藏
Tianjin Coastal Storm Surge Disaster Assessment Based on Urban Waterlogging Simulation Model
-
摘要: 基于城市内涝仿真模型，根据天津沿海地区的地形、地貌特征以及排水系统等对城市内涝仿真模型进行改进，在沿海边界和河口设置时变水位，使得模型拓展到既能模拟暴雨产生的内涝，也能模拟由于风暴潮侵袭造成的淹没情景。该模型对天津沿海地区历史上典型风暴潮个例以及10年、20年、50年、100年一遇重现期风暴潮产生的积水范围和积水深度进行了模拟，并对2012年8月3日台风达维 (1210) 造成的天津沿海风暴潮进行了业务试应用。将历史风暴潮个例模拟结果以及2012年8月3日的评估结果与实际灾情进行对比，结果显示模型具有较好的模拟能力，可应用于风暴潮灾害的评估和预估业务中，为相关部门和行业提供决策参考。Abstract: Most waterlogging models for inland city use a single boundary condition, the boundary is usually set in a small or large river, with a single flow direction towards outside the region, or set on a highway or a large dam without water exchange alternatively. However, for coastal areas, the ebb and flow lead to changes in wet and dry. Adapting to the intertidal nature, the model should involve dealing with dynamic boundary.Based on urban waterlogging simulation model, the topography and geomorphology of Tianjin coastal areas, as well as the pipe network and drainage systems, are used to expand and improve Tianjin urban waterlogging simulation model. Dynamic water level is set at the coastal border, and the water level stands for the tidal level. When the tide level is higher than the coastal embankment, the tide floods into the city and causes waterlogging. Therefore, the model simulates not only rainfall waterlogging but also the submerging scenario due to storm surge invasion. The flooding scope and standing water depth are simulated using the redeveloped model for the historically typical storm tidal cases in the coastal areas of Tianjin. Referred with the collected records of disaster and actual survey, the developed model takes on skills to some extent in simulation of the submerged scenario due to storm surge invasion. Differences between the simulation and the historical records, however, are non-intentionally increased by using the latest ground elevation data. This approach is used in operational application for simulating the storm surge caused by Typhoon Damrey on 3 August 2012. The simulated flooding scope and site are closed to the actual scene, but the simulated standing water depth is larger. Much more detailed calibration should be done in future. Furthermore, the submerging scenarios caused by storm surge in several return periods are simulated. These simulations can be directly used in projecting and assessing the submerging scenario if there is a storm surge predicted to be an N-year return-level or if it has occurred. These simulations can also be directly reported to the government and business clients for early warning.
-
Key words:
- Tianjin coastal areas;
- storm surge;
- flooding;
- assessment
-
表 1 1992年和2003年两次风暴潮模拟结果
Table 1 Simulation outputs for two storm surges in 1992 and 2003
时间 最高潮位/m 积水面积/km2 积水深度/m 不同深度等级积水面积/km2 0.1~0.25 m 0.26~0.5 m 0.6~0.8 m >0.8 m 1992-09-01 5.87 282.1 1.72 46.8 61.5 73.2 43.0 2003-10-11 5.29 65.0 1.13 7.6 15.1 5.5 4.1 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同重现期风暴潮潮位下的积水模拟结果
Table 2 Simulation outputs for the submerged depth under different return-level storm surge
重现期/a 潮位/m 试验方案 积水面积/km2 积水深度/m 不同深度等级积水面积/km2 0.1~0.25 m 0.26~0.5 m 0.6~0.8 m >0.8 m 10 5.28 潮位 51.0 1.12 5.5 12.4 4.7 4.1 潮位及降水 1061.6 3.17 244.7 178.6 81.7 84.6 20 5.43 潮位 81.4 1.28 25.7 19.1 10.9 5.7 潮位及降水 1071.8 3.16 259.6 175.2 89.7 85.2 50 5.63 潮位 168.5 1.47 26.9 48.3 33.9 20.6 潮位及降水 1122.9 3.17 258.1 203.5 110.6 99.9 100 5.77 潮位 218.0 1.62 41.8 52.9 48.5 33.8 潮位及降水 1156.4 3.18 265.7 211.1 127.4 117.1
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 李阔, 李国胜.风暴潮风险研究进展.自然灾害学报, 2011, 20(6):104-111. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH201106019.htm [2] 陆人骥.中国历代灾害性海潮史料.北京:海洋出版社, 1984:15-19. [3] 杨华庭, 田素珍, 叶琳, 等.中国海洋灾害四十年资料汇编.北京:海洋出版社, 1994:107. [4] 张俊香, 李平日, 黄光庆.新奥尔良飓风灾难与华南沿海台风暴潮.热带地理, 2006, 26(3):218-222. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDDD200603004.htm [5] 天津市地方志编修委员会办公室, 天津市气象局.天津通志气象志.天津:天津社会科学院出版社, 2005:67-68. [6] 赵玉洁.天津滨海新区风暴潮预报系统研究.兰州:兰州大学, 2005:25-28. [7] 赵庆良, 许世远, 王军, 等.沿海城市风暴潮灾害风险评估研究进展.地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5):32-40. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.05.004 [8] 扈海波, 轩春怡, 诸立尚.北京地区城市暴雨积涝灾害风险预评估.应用气象学报, 2013, 23(1):99-108. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20130110 [9] 郑国, 薛建军, 范广洲, 等.淮河上游暴雨事件评估模型.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(6):753-759. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20110614 [10] 任雨, 李明财, 郭军, 等.天津地区设计暴雨强度的推算与适用.应用气象学报, 2013, 23(3):364-368. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120313&flag=1 [11] 谢炯光, 纪忠萍, 谷德军, 等.广东省6月长连续暴雨过程的气候特征及成因.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(2):174-183. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20120206 [12] 易笑园, 李泽椿, 孙晓磊, 等.渤海西岸暴雨中尺度对流系统的结构及成因.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(1):23-34. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20110103 [13] 乐肯堂.我国风暴潮灾害风险评估方法的基本问题.海洋预报, 1998, 15(30):39-44. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYYB803.007.htm [14] 王国栋, 康建成, 闫国东.沿海城市风暴潮灾害风险评估研究述评.灾害学, 2010, 25(3):114-118. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201003026.htm [15] 李阔, 李国胜.珠江三角洲地区风暴潮重现期及增水与环境要素的关系.地理科学进展, 2010, 29(4):433-438. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.04.007 [16] 闫丽凤, 江文胜, 周淑玲, 等.0703温带气旋特大风暴潮数值模拟对比分析.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(5):595-601. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20080511 [17] 肖启华, 张建新, 黄冬梅.城市风暴潮灾害快速评估的模糊决策方法.灾害学, 2011, 26(2):77-80. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201102016.htm [18] 张俊香, 黄崇福, 刘旭拢.广东沿海台风暴潮灾害的地理分布特征和风险评估 (1949—2005).应用基础与工程科学学报, 2008, 16(3):393-402. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJGX200803012.htm [19] 李江明.基于SWMM模型的城市暴雨内涝研究——以东莞市典型小区为例.广州:中山大学, 2009:2-3. [20] 耿艳芬.城市雨洪的水动力学耦合模型研究.大连:大连理工大学, 2006:40-50. [21] 岑国平, 沈晋, 范荣生.城市暴雨径流计算模型的建立和检验.西安理工大学学报, 1996, 12(3):184-190. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XALD199603005.htm [22] 解以扬, 李大鸣, 李培彦, 等.城市暴雨内涝数学模型的研究与应用.水科学进展, 2005, 16(3):384-390. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDB201405084.htm [23] 解以扬, 韩素芹, 由立宏, 等.天津市暴雨内涝灾害风险分析.气象科学, 2004, 24(3):342-349. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKX200403012.htm -
图(3) / 表(2)
计量
- 摘要浏览量: 2913
- HTML全文浏览量: 1058
- PDF下载量: 1695
- 被引次数: 0
