Radar Echo Characteristics and Recognition of Warm-sector Torrential Rain in Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 暖区暴雨强度大且降水集中,可造成严重气象灾害。利用四川盆地实况降水和7部天气雷达资料,分析了2012—2017年28次暖区暴雨过程的降水特征,按超过20 mm·h-1降水站数的突增,将暖区暴雨的雷暴群分为初生阶段和成熟阶段,根据不同降水类型成熟前后的雷达回波特征,将雷暴群分为3种类型,3类回波特征差异明显,雷暴的长时间生消、合并以及传播作用使暖区暴雨降水强度大、范围广。在28次暖区暴雨过程中,四川盆地西北部出现次数最多,持续时间最长,回波基本呈现东北—西南向,与四川盆地西部龙门山脉走向基本一致,地形(产生偏东风)抬升在暖区暴雨的发生发展中起关键作用。对3类雷暴群质心高度、顶高、最大回波强度等要素的统计显示,不同类型雷暴群在初生阶段和成熟阶段的概率密度曲线存在双峰和单峰等结构特征。利用雷暴群的多个参数构建暖区暴雨分类识别的特征向量,并采用随机森林机器学习方法进行识别,取得较好效果。Abstract: Based on data of real-time precipitation and weather radar during 28 torrential rain events in warm regions of Sichuan Basin, radar echo characteristics of torrential rain in early and mature stages are analyzed. Feature vectors for identifying early and mature stages of torrential rain in warm regions are constructed and the selected samples are studied by random forest machine learning method. According to the influence range, duration, and cumulative amount of precipitation, the thunderstorm group is the main part of the rainstorm in the warm region, and its development can be divided into three types.According to the burst of short-term heavy precipitation, thunderstorm groups are divided into primary and mature stages. In the early stage of the thunderstorm to the mature stage, the "in situ development type" is dominant, the "individual development type" and the "in front side trigger type" are the second. With the evolution after the maturity, the "in situ development type" and the "front side trigger type" are the main types. Convective precipitation is the main type of heavy rain in the warm area. After the first type of thunderstorm group, the combination of mature thunderstorms is the main source of thunderstorms, which moves slowly and is conducive to the generation of heavy precipitation. In front of mature thunderstorms, new thunderstorm cells are continuously generated and merged to continue spreading northward, forming a large range of precipitation. Individual development thunderstorm groups have the longest duration and a large influencing range. They are accompanied by long-term merge when moving. Among 28 processes, a large proportion appears in the northwest and has the longest duration. Echoes of these processes are in the southwest-northeast direction, which is basically consistent with the trend of the Longmen mountains in the western part of the Basin. The uplift of the topography (generating easterly wind) plays a key role in the occurrence and development of warm rainstorms. In the primary stage, the average core height and average top height of "in situ development type" thunderstorm group has a bimodal structure. Similar structure is found for "front side trigger type" in the mature stage. Multiple parameters of three types of thunderstorm groups show a unimodal distribution in the nascent and mature stages. To identify heavy rains in the warm area, feature vector is constructed using multiple parameters of the thunderstorm group, and random forest machine learning is also applied, leading to satisfying results.
-
表 1 不同类型过程降水特征
Table 1 Characteristics of precipitation for different types
类型 降水持续时间 降水范围 过程累积降水 过程降水总体特征 Ⅰ型 较短 较小 强 降水移动缓慢导致累积降水大,范围小,持续时间较短 Ⅱ型 较长 较大 较强 降水相对集中,但范围不断扩大,导致影响范围大、持续时间长 Ⅲ型 最长 大 较小 降水分散,影响范围大,持续时间长 表 2 典型过程的环境参数
Table 2 Environmental parameters of typical cases
类型 过程 对流有效
位能/(J·kg-1)850 hPa假相当
位温/℃850 hPa
比湿/(g·kg-1)850 hPa
露点/℃0~2 km垂直风
切变/(m·s-1)20140912 2190 83.5 16.3 19 2.0 Ⅰ型 20170818 2779 89.0 17.3 20 1.2 20170821 3604 89.0 17.3 20 1.6 20130725 3746 90.5 17.5 20 4.6 Ⅱ型 20170716 4126 92.6 18.4 21 4.4 20170719 3178 90.5 17.6 20 2.6 Ⅲ型 20130619 2313 93.9 18.1 21 4.4 20170722 1993 92.7 18.5 21 7.6 表 3 识别结果
Table 3 Recognition result
试验序号 训练样本 测试样本 正确识别样本 初生误识别为成熟 成熟误识别为初生 分类识别正确率/% 试验1 475 153 140 6 7 91.5 试验2 474 154 145 2 7 94.2 试验3 475 153 138 7 8 90.2 试验4 448 180 166 3 11 92.2 试验5 473 155 141 5 9 90.9 试验6 459 169 158 3 8 93.5 -
[1] 黄士松.华南前汛期暴雨.广州:广东科技出版社, 1986:227-228. [2] 何立富, 陈涛, 孔期.华南暖区暴雨研究进展.应用气象学报, 2016, 27(5):559-569. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20160505 [3] 罗建英, 廖胜石, 黄归兰, 等.广西前汛期锋前暖区暴雨过程的模拟与分析.气象, 2009, 35(10):50-57. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2009.10.006 [4] 苗春生, 杨艺亚, 王坚红, 等.两类华南沿海暖区暴雨特征及热力发展机制对比研究.热带气象学报, 2017, 33(1):53-63. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/rdqxxb201701006 [5] 何立富, 周庆亮, 陈涛."05.6"华南暴雨中低纬度系统活动及相互作用.应用气象学报, 2010, 21(4):385-394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2010.04.001 [6] 梁海河.华南暴雨试验天气雷达数据处理及暴雨中尺度结构个例分析.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(3):281-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2004.03.004 [7] 梁海河, 阮征, 葛润生.华南暴雨试验天气雷达数据处理及暴雨中尺度结构个例分析.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(3):281-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2004.03.004 [8] 倪允琪, 周秀骥, 张人禾, 等.我国南方暴雨的试验与研究.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(6):690-704. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.06.007 [9] 夏丽花, 吴启树, 黄美金, 等.一次暖区强降水的热力动力条件.气象科技, 2010, 38(5):572-576. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2010.05.007 [10] 陈玥, 谌芸, 陈涛, 等.长江中下游地区暖区暴雨特征分析.气象, 2016, 42(6):724-731. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/8444313 [11] 王宗敏, 丁一汇, 张迎新, 等.西太平洋副热带高压的边界特征及其附近暖区对流雨带成因.气象学报, 2014, 72(3):417-427. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201403001 [12] 王坚红, 杨艺亚, 苗春生, 等.华南沿海暖区辐合线暴雨地形动力机制数值模拟研究.大气科学, 2017, 41(4):784-796. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=daqikx201704010 [13] 徐臖, 杨舒楠, 孙军, 等.北方一次暖区大暴雨强降水成因探讨.气象, 2014, 40(12):1455-1463. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2014.12.004 [14] 王建捷, 郭肖容.1996年初次华南暴雨过程的数值模拟及其分析.应用气象学报, 1997, 8(3):257-268. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jamsweb/article/id/19970338 [15] 侯淑梅, 孙兴池, 范苏丹, 等.切变线冷区和暖区暴雨落区分析.大气科学学报, 2014, 37(3):333-343. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7097.2014.03.010 [16] 李川, 陈静, 何光碧, 等.青藏高原东侧陡峭地形对一次强降水天气过程的影响.高原气象, 2006, 25(3):442-450. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0534.2006.03.012 [17] 周长春, 吴蓬萍, 周秋雪.一次复杂地形暖区强降水特征及触发机制分析.暴雨灾害, 2015, 34(1):27-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2015.01.004 [18] 矫梅燕, 李川, 李延香.一次川东大暴雨过程的中尺度分析.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(5):699-704. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2005.05.018 [19] 陈忠明, 闵文彬, 高文良, 等.一次持续性强暴雨过程的平均特征.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(3):273-280. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.03.003 [20] 张晓美, 蒙伟光, 张艳霞, 等.华南暖区暴雨中尺度对流系统的分析.热带气象学报, 2009, 25(5):551-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2009.05.005 [21] 徐燚, 闫敬华, 王谦谦, 等.华南暖区暴雨的一种低层重力波触发机制.高原气象, 2013, 32(4):1050-1061. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/6588534 [22] 吴亚丽, 蒙伟光, 陈德辉, 等.一次华南暖区暴雨过程可预报性的初值影响研究.气象学报, 2018, 76(3):323-342. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201803001 [23] 叶朗明, 徐碧裕.两次不同类型暖区暴雨的对比分析.气象研究与应用, 2014, 35(4):5-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8411.2014.04.002 [24] 谌芸, 吕伟绮, 于超, 等.北方一次暖区大暴雨降水预报失败案例剖析.气象, 2018, 44(1):15-25. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qx201801002 [25] 郭弘, 林永辉, 周淼, 等.华南暖区暴雨中一次飑线的中尺度分析.暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(2):171-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2014.02.010 [26] 刘蕾, 陈茂钦, 张凌云.柳州锋前暖区暴雨的分型及统计特征分析.气象研究与应用, 2016, 37(4):12-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8411.2016.04.003 [27] 夏茹娣, 赵思雄, 孙建华.一次华南锋前暖区暴雨β中尺度系统环境特征的分析研究.大气科学, 2006, 30(5):988-1008. doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2006.05.26 [28] 赵玉春, 李泽椿, 肖子牛.华南锋面与暖区暴雨个例对比分析.气象科技, 2008, 36(1):48-53. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxkj200801009 [29] 傅朝, 杨晓军, 周晓军, 等.2013年6月19-20日甘肃陇东南暖区暴雨多普勒雷达特征分析.气象, 2015, 41(9):1095-1103. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qx201509006 [30] 张诚忠, 万齐林, 杨兆礼, 等.华南暖区强对流降水系统的结构和闪电特征分析.高原气象, 2011, 30(4):1034-1045. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gyqx201104021 [31] 赵庆云, 傅朝, 刘新伟, 等.西北东部暖区大暴雨中尺度系统演变特征.高原气象, 2017, 36(3):697-704. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gyqx201703011 [32] 王改利, 刘黎平, 阮征.多普勒雷达资料在暴雨临近预报中的应用.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3):388-395. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2007.03.016 [33] Fernandez-Delgado M, Cernadas E, Barro S.Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, 15(1):3133-3181. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279556630_Do_we_need_hundreds_of_classifiers_to_solve_real_world_classification_problems