Yang Yun, Quan Jimei, Ding Lei, et al. National solar radiation measurement standards and quality control. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(1): 95-102. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150110.
Citation: Yang Yun, Quan Jimei, Ding Lei, et al. National solar radiation measurement standards and quality control. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(1): 95-102. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150110.

National Solar Radiation Measurement Standards and Quality Control

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150110
  • Received Date: 2014-03-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-09-11
  • Publish Date: 2015-01-31
  • In order to ensure the accuracy of national solar radiation measurements and the world radiometric reference (WRR) transfer, quality control is carried out on the solar radiation measurement standards. There is a full set of sound management system and quality guarantee measure over many years' improvement, including the measurement standard of value transfer and traceability, the selection and validation of calibration method, calibration process and data quality control, staffed and personnel skill requirements and so on. It also passes the measurement standard reexamination organized by General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ).The radiation value is directly traceable to the WRR every five years through attending the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) International Pyrheliometer Comparisons (IPC), and then the metrological verification or calibration method is adopted for the standard radiation instrument value transfer, to ensure the accuracy of WRR in China and neighboring countries. China national solar radiation measuring standard is directly compared with the WRR for 3 times in 15 years, and comparison results of the uncertainty is 0.17%, surpassing requirements of WMO.In order to ensure measurement standards between the international cycle comparison interval, and keep them in good confidence calibration status, the repeatability and stability of solar radiation measurement standards should be checked every year to determine standards in original state. In fact, there should be more times of checking if conditions allow to reduce the uncertainty introduced by the repeatability of measurement error. Mean value control chart is used to judge whether the measurement process is affected by uncontrolled system bias, and graphics memory way is used to achieve continuous and long-term statistical quality control. Period verification shows the solar radiation measurement repeatability and years of stability is no more than 0.1% and less than 0.25%, within the control limits and taking a random distribution state. That ensures the measuring process in a stable controlled status, meeting the standard requirements.Above all, the WRR international comparison itself cannot ensure the national solar radiation measurement standards fully meet the quality assurance requirements, a lot of collaborative international comparison and period verification should be carried out to ensure that the measurement uncertainty is controlled within the allowable range of 0.25%.
  • Fig. 1  Traceability of national solar radiation

    Fig. 2  Deviation of national solar radiation measurement standards from WRR (from Reference [15])

    Fig. 3  National solar radiation measurement standards period verification

    Fig. 4  Repeatability of national solar radiation measurement standards

    Fig. 5  Stability of national solar radiation measurement standards

    Fig. 6  National solar radiation measurment standard control

    Fig. 7  Consistency of national solar radiation measurement standards with check standard

    Table  1  WRR factor of national solar radiation measurement standards (from Reference [13-15])

    年份 WRR因子 标准偏差
    表号为850406 表号为19743 表号为850406 表号为19743
    2000 0.999680 0.998510 0.000600 0.001570
    2005 0.999445 0.999495 0.000621 0.001796
    2010 1.000198 0.000876
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  The WRR factor of China and other regional centers of radiation measurement standard (from Reference [15])

    国家 WRR因子
    中国 1.000198
    美国 0.999294
    澳大利亚 1.001752
    法国 0.999858
    德国 0.999684
    俄罗斯 0.996482
    瑞典 1.000657
    日本 1.000046
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    郑有飞, 关福来, 蔡子颖, 等.我国南方中东部地区地面太阳总辐射变化规律.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(3):312-320. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20110307
    [2]
    李晓文, 李维亮, 周秀骥.中国近30年太阳辐射状况研究.应用气象学报, 1998, 9(1):24-31. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19980104&flag=1
    [3]
    李清泉, 王兰宁, 徐影.辐射参数化方案对气候模拟和回报的影响.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(增刊Ⅰ):12-21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2005S1001.htm
    [4]
    邱金桓, 许潇锋, 杨景梅.北京等7个气象台站太阳总辐射观测资料的准确度评估.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(3):287-296. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20080304
    [5]
    杨云, 丁蕾, 程兴宏, 等.PSP总辐射表灵敏度系数的热偏移订正方法.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(5):585-592. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20120509
    [6]
    宋建洋, 郑向东, 程兴宏, 等.临安与龙凤山辐射数据质量及初步结果比较.应用气象学报, 2013, 24(1):65-74. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20130107
    [7]
    邓媛芳, 倪育才, 丁跃清.计量标准考核讲义.全国计量标准、计量检定人员考核委员会, 2008.
    [8]
    McArthur L J B.World Climate Research Propramme.Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN).Operations Manual, Version 2.1, 2004.
    [9]
    Cheng Xinghong, Ding Lei, Yang Yun, et al.Correction methods for thermal offset errors in TBQ-2-B pyranometers.J Trop Meteorol, 2014, 20(4):66-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274712310_Correction_methods_for_thermal_offset_errors_in_TBQ-2-B_pyranometers
    [10]
    Reda I, Myers D, Stoffel T.Uncertainty estimate for the outdoor calibration of solar pyranometers:A metrologist perspective.Journal of Measurement Science, 2008, 3(4):58-66. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/981980
    [11]
    杨云, 王冬, 吕文华, 等.我国太阳辐射标准与量值传递.仪器仪表学报, 2007, 28(8):429-435. http://youxian.cnki.com.cn/yxdetail.aspx?filename=QXKJ201702001&dbname=CJFDPREP
    [12]
    JJF 1033—2008计量标准考核规范.北京:中国质检出版社, 2008.
    [13]
    WMO International Pyrheliometer Comparison IPC-Ⅸ Final Report.MeteoSwiss Working Report No.197, 2001.
    [14]
    WMO International Pyrheliometer Comparison IPC-ⅩFinal Report.WMO/DT No.1320, 2006.
    [15]
    WMO International Pyrheliometer Comparison IPC-Ⅺ Final Report.WMO IOM Report No.108, 2011.
    [16]
    《法定计量检定机构考核规范》实施指南. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2012.
    [17]
    JJG456—92直接辐射表检定规程. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1992.
    [18]
    JJF1059. 1—2012测量不确定度评定与表示. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2012.
    [19]
    GB/T 14890—94工作直接辐射表的校准方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1994.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (4124) PDF downloads(1052) Cited by()
    • Received : 2014-03-12
    • Accepted : 2014-09-11
    • Published : 2015-01-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint