Hu Banghui, Liu Shanliang, Xi Yan, et al. An algorithm of optimal subset for Bayes precipitation probability prediction model. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(2): 185-192. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150206.
Citation: Hu Banghui, Liu Shanliang, Xi Yan, et al. An algorithm of optimal subset for Bayes precipitation probability prediction model. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(2): 185-192. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150206.

An Algorithm of Optimal Subset for Bayes Precipitation Probability Prediction Model

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150206
  • Received Date: 2014-08-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-01-04
  • Publish Date: 2015-03-31
  • Based on numerical prediction products, a model output statistic (MOS) for precipitation forecast of an observatory is set up which contains the model output rainfall as one of predictors. The model can remove the systemic error of numerical prediction on precipitation, so it improves the precipitation prediction skill to certain degree. But for a given amount of predictors, a problem to solve is how to select the optimal subset to improve the prediction skill especially in operational weather forecast. In order to construct a Naïve Bayes precipitation probability prediction model on the precondition of the best performance from optimal subsets, using T511 model products and their 13-hour to 24-hour forecast corresponding observation of precipitation from 2008 to 2010 at three observatories, namely Jiexiu, Yuncheng and Fengning, the classificatory Naïve Bayes models on precipitation probability are developed and valuated. Different from the treatment of classic optimal subsets regression which enumerates the optimal subset one by one under the rule of couple score criterion (CSC), a Naïve Bayes model using genetic algorithm to search the optimal subset from a great many of subsets is presented. Model follows artificial intelligence searching characteristics. The genetic algorithm is established through the construction of gene bit-series from binary encoding method, and the introduction of a fitness function with cause. Considering the elimination of non-existing affair samples for the weather of low probability, two models are built based on genetic algorithm and Naïve Bayes model. The essential difference between two kinds of models is the fitness functions they use: One uses the accuracy of precipitation as fitness function, and it is called genetic algorithm-Naïve Bayes forecasting model type 1, GA-NB1 in brief; the other one uses threat score as fitness function, and is called GA-NB2 accordingly. The models are evaluated by prediction tests with dataset ranging from July to September in 2011. Results indicate that simulated results of optimal subset are much superior to those of ordinary initial subsets. Both GA-NB1 and GA-NB2 can improve T511 model precipitation accuracy by 19% on precipitation occurrence, threat scores are improved by 0.16 and 0.13 on drizzle and moderate precipitation, respectively. The prediction for precipitation occurrence and drizzle is enhanced by the optimal subset model because they effectively reduce the false alarm rate of numerical model, by more than 19 times during the period. The cause for improving moderate rain prediction includes two aspects: A slight increase in the amount of correct forecast and decrease of false alarms.
  • Fig. 1  The simulated precipitation occurrence prediction fitness functions of GA-NB1 and GA-NB2 at Jiexiu Station

    Fig. 2  The observed, GA-NB1 and T511 predicted 13-24-hour classificatory precipitation at Jiexiu Station from Jul to Sep in 2011

    Table  1  The best optimal subsets of precipitation occurrence predictors selectedby two kinds of fitness functions at Jiexiu Station

    GA-NB1 GA-NB2
    降水量 降水量
    地面温度 地面温度
    温度露点差 温度露点差
    假相当位温 假相当位温
    云量 24 h变温
    土壤湿度 条件性稳定度指数
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  The prediction evaluation of 13-24-hour classificatory precipitation at Jiexiu, Yuncheng and Fengning stations from Jul to Sep in 2011

    预报分类 统计对象 介休站 运城站 丰宁站
    T511 GA-NB1 GA-NB2 T511 GA-NB1 GA-NB2 T511 GA-NB1 GA-NB2
    晴雨 准确率/% 64.4 90.0 90.0 57.8 82.2 81.1 78.9 90.0 87.8
    正确次数 23 22 22 19 15 15 16 14 13
    漏报次数 2 3 3 1 5 5 3 5 6
    空报次数 30 6 6 37 11 12 16 7 6
    小雨 TS评分 0.20 0.56 0.57 0.16 0.25 0.17 0.26 0.42 0.36
    正确次数 9 12 13 7 5 4 8 10 9
    漏报次数 6 3 2 7 9 10 8 6 7
    空报次数 30 7 8 29 6 10 15 8 9
    中雨 TS评分 0.19 0.45 0.44 0.13 0.38 0.36 0.11 0.5 0
    正确次数 3 5 4 2 5 4 1 1 0
    漏报次数 5 3 4 3 0 1 1 1 2
    空报次数 8 3 1 11 8 6 7 0 0
    大雨 TS评分 0.33 0 0 0 0.50 0.33 0 0 0
    正确次数 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
    漏报次数 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
    空报次数 2 0 1 5 1 2 1 2 1
    暴雨 TS评分 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    正确次数 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    漏报次数 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    空报次数 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    闵晶晶, 孙景荣, 刘还珠, 等.一种改进的BP算法及在降水预报中的应用.应用气象学报, 2010, 21(1):55-62. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20100107
    [2]
    刘还珠, 赵声蓉, 陆志善, 等.国家气象中心气象要素的客观预报——MOS系统.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(2):181-191. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040223&flag=1
    [3]
    刘爱鸣, 潘宁, 邹燕, 等.福建前汛期区域暴雨客观预报模型研究.应用气象学报, 2003, 14(4):420-429. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20030452&flag=1
    [4]
    赵声蓉, 裴海瑛.客观定量预报中降水的预处理.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(1):21-28. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20070104
    [5]
    燕东渭, 孙田文, 杨艳, 等.支持向量机数据描述在西北暴雨预报中的应用试验.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(5):676-681. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20070503
    [6]
    Raftery A E, Gneiting T, Balandaoui F, et al.Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.Mon Wea Rev, 2005, 133:1155-1174. doi:  10.1175/MWR2906.1
    [7]
    Sloughter J M, Raftery A E, Gneiting T, et al.Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Bayesian model averaging.Mon Wea Rev, 2007, 135:3209-3220. doi:  10.1175/MWR3441.1
    [8]
    Liu J N K, Li B N L, Dillon T S.An improved Naive Bayesian classifier technique coupled with a novel input solution method.IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C:Application and Reviews, 2001, 31(2):249-256. doi:  10.1109/5326.941848
    [9]
    王开宇, 赵瑞星, 翟宇梅.朴素贝叶斯分类器在降水预报中的应用.军事气象水文, 2007, 31(3):41-44. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGQX201209001154.htm
    [10]
    郭雅芬, 过仲阳, 苏君毅, 等.贝叶斯分类法在MCS移动路径预测中的应用.地球信息科学, 2007, 9(2):20-23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXX200702005.htm
    [11]
    苏君毅, 邱洁, 过仲阳, 等.基于贝叶斯方法的中尺度对流系统移动方向研究.华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 6:41-46. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDSZ200606004.htm
    [12]
    柯宗建, 张培群, 董文杰, 等.最优子集回归方法在季节气候预测中的应用.大气科学, 2009, 33(5):994-1002. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200905012.htm
    [13]
    谷德军, 纪忠萍, 李春晖.南海夏季风爆发日期与海温的多尺度关系及最优子集回归预测.海洋学报, 2011, 33(6):55-63. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEAC201106007.htm
    [14]
    李玲萍, 尚可政, 钱莉, 等.最优子集回归在夏季高温极值预报中的应用, 兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 46(6):54-58. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDZK201006011.htm
    [15]
    Nawaz M, Enscore E, Ham I.A Heuristic algorithm for the machine, n job flowshop.The International Journal of Management Sciences, 1983, 11(1):91-95. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/showciting?cid=248129
    [16]
    赵凯, 孙燕, 张备, 等.T213数值预报产品在本地降水预报中的释用.气象科学, 2008, 28(2):217-220. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKX200802015.htm
    [17]
    刘建文, 郭虎, 李耀东, 等.天气分析预报物理量计算基础.北京:气象出版社, 2005:1-253.
    [18]
    王学忠, 胡邦辉, 吕梅, 等.沙瓦特指数的一种迭代算法.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(4):486-491. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.200904014
    [19]
    Zhou Lina, Feng Jinjuan, Sears A, et al.Applying the Naïve Bayes Classifier to Assist Users in Detecting Speech Recognition Errors.Big land, Hawaii:System Sciences, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 2005:183. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224755610_Applying_the_Naive_Bayes_Classifier_to_Assist_Users_in_Detecting_Speech_Recognition_Errors
    [20]
    韩瑞峰.遗传算法原理与应用实例.北京:兵器工业出版社, 2010:1-443.
    [21]
    夏祥华, 孙汉文.基于遗传算法的曲线拟合方法用于重叠荧光光谱的定量解析.光谱学与光谱分析, 2012, 32(8):2157-2161. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GUAN201208038.htm
    [22]
    王双成.贝叶斯网络学习、推理与应用.上海:立信会计出版社, 2010:1-291.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (2704) PDF downloads(821) Cited by()
    • Received : 2014-08-31
    • Accepted : 2015-01-04
    • Published : 2015-03-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint