Tang Shengjun, Wang Donghai, Du Jun, et al. The experiment of hybrid ensemble forecast approach in short-range forecast for South China rainstorm. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(6): 669-679. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150603.
Citation: Tang Shengjun, Wang Donghai, Du Jun, et al. The experiment of hybrid ensemble forecast approach in short-range forecast for South China rainstorm. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(6): 669-679. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150603.

The Experiment of Hybrid Ensemble Forecast Approach in Short-range Forecast for South China Rainstorm

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150603
  • Received Date: 2015-03-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-06-10
  • Publish Date: 2015-11-30
  • Hybrid ensemble forecast approach composed of high-resolution and low-resolution model is tested with multi-initial conditions and multi-physics ensemble prediction system (EPS) based on ARPS and WRF. Three kinds of ensemble prediction experiments (ARPS model ensemble, WRF model ensemble and ARPS-WRF multi-model ensemble) are designed to comparatively analyze the precipitation effect between the hybrid ensemble forecast approach and traditional ensemble forecast approach based on the heavy rainfall event occurred in Southern China on 8 May 2013. ARPS model ensemble improves local precipitation simulation over southern part of Guangdong Province. The center intensity of southern ensemble mean reaches 150 mm, close to the observation, but its location shifts northeast a little. The distribution of ensemble spread is similar to that of ensemble mean. The probabilistic forecast area of the approach is close to the observation in terms of the torrential rain and downpour forecast. The Threat Score (TS) show that the greatest improvements for order of magnitude precipitation are obtained by the hybrid ensemble approach. The Brier Score (BS) also shows that the improvement on moderate rain, heavy rain and torrential rain is obvious, but the improvement on downpour and excessive storm is limited for the approach. WRF model ensemble has a better performance on precipitation simulation over northern part of Guangdong Province, but the hybrid approach is limited because of the large frequency of false alarms and misses. ARPS-WRF multi-models obviously improve precipitation simulation which has a better performance than those of traditional ensemble forecast approach on precipitation area and intensity. The center intensity of southern precipitation reaches 70 mm, less than the observation and it is caused by the weaker WRF members forecast. The distribution of ensemble spread is similar to that of ensemble mean. The probabilistic forecast of torrential rain and downpour in southern area is best up to 40%. The TS shows that the greatest improvements for order of magnitude precipitation are obtained by the hybrid ensemble approach, especially for heavy rain, torrential rain and downpour. The BS also shows that the improvement on moderate rain, heavy rain and torrential rain is obvious. ARPS-WRF multi-models have better performance than ARPS model on the forecast of downpour and excessive storm. Therefore, the hybrid ensemble forecast approach achieves high-resolution ensemble forecast system and improves the precipitation simulation combining low-resolution ensemble run with single high-resolution control model run. Meanwhile, a reference to high-resolution ensemble forecast system is provided for operational weather prediction centers.
  • Fig. 1  Observed precipitation from 0800 BT to 2000 BT on 8 May 2013

    Fig. 2  12 h accumulative precipitation ensemble mean and spread of 3 schemes in ARPS

    Fig. 3  12 h precipitation probabilistic forecast of 3 schemes in ARPS

    Fig. 4  Threat Score and Brier Score of 12 h accumulative precipitation for 3 schemes in ARPS

    Fig. 5  12 h accumulative precipition ensemble mean and spread of 3 schemes in WRF

    Fig. 6  Threat Score and Brier Score of 12 h accumulative precipitation for 3 schemes in WRF

    Fig. 7  12 h accumulative precipitation ensemble mean and spread of 3 schemes in ARPS-WRF

    Fig. 8  12 h precipitation probabilistic forecast of 3 schemes in ARPS-WRF

    Fig. 9  Threat Score and Brier Score of 12 h accumulative precipitation for 3 schemes in ARPS-WRF

    Table  1  The formation of ensemble members of the system

    成员 微物理方案 积云对流方案 边界层方案
    ARPS_ctl LIN KF PBL specified
    ARPS_n1 WARMRA Kuo+Kessler PBL diagnosed
    ARPS_p1 WARMRA KF PBL diagnosed
    ARPS_n2 NEMICE KF PBL specified
    ARPS_p2 LIN New KF PBL diagnosed
    ARPS_n3 NEMICE Kuo+Kessler PBL diagnosed
    ARPS_p3 WARMRA New KF PBL specified
    WRF_ctl LIN BMJ MYJ
    WRF_n1 LIN New KF MYJ
    WRF_p1 Thompson BMJ YSU
    WRF_n2 WSM6 BMJ YSU
    WRF_p2 WSM5 New KF MYJ
    WRF_n3 Ferrier New KF YSU
    WRF_p3 WSM5 BMJ MYJ
    注:n代表负扰动成员,p代表正扰动成员,ctl代表控制预报。
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    Lorenz E N.A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model.Tellus, 1956, 17:321-333. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227661690_A_Study_of_the_Predictability_of_a_28-Variable_Atmospheric_Model
    [2]
    杜钧.集合预报的现状和前景.应用气象学报, 2002, 13(1):16-28. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020102&flag=1
    [3]
    杜钧, 陈静.单一值预报向概率预报转变的基础:谈谈集合预报及其带来的变革.气象, 2010, 36(11):1-11. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2010.11.001
    [4]
    王晨稀.短期集合降水概率预报试验.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(1):78-88. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20050110
    [5]
    吴政谦, 徐海明, 王东海, 等.中尺度多模式超级集合预报对2010年6月19-20日中国南方大暴雨过程的分析.热带气象学报, 2012, 28(5):653-663. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX201205006.htm
    [6]
    王晨稀, 梁旭东.热带气旋路径集合预报试验.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(5):586-593. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20070513
    [7]
    赵琳娜, 刘莹, 党皓飞, 等.集合数值预报在洪水预报中的应用进展.应用气象学报, 2014, 25(6):641-653. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20140601
    [8]
    Du J, Tracton M S.Implementation of a Real-time Short-range Ensemble Forecasting System at NCEP, an Update//Preprints, 9th Conferenceon Mesoscale Processes.Amer Meteor Soc, 2001:355-356.
    [9]
    Bowler N E, Arribas A, Mylne K R, et al.The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system.Q J R Meteor Soc, 2008, 134:703-722. doi:  10.1002/(ISSN)1477-870X
    [10]
    Descamps L, Labadie C, Joly A, et al.PEARP, the Météo-France short-range ensemble prediction system.Q J R Meteor Soc, 2014, doi: 10.1002/qj.2469.
    [11]
    邓国, 龚建东, 邓莲堂, 等.国家级区域集合预报系统研发和性能检验.应用气象学报, 2010, 21(5):513-523. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20100501
    [12]
    Ma J, Zhu Y, Wobus R, et al.Aneffective configuration of ensemble size and horizontal resolution for the NCEP GEFS.Adv Atmos Sci, 2012, 29:782-794. doi:  10.1007/s00376-012-1249-y
    [13]
    Du J.Hybrid Ensemble Prediction System:A New Ensembling Approach//Preprints, Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction.Amer Meteor Soc, 2004:14-17.
    [14]
    Toth Z, Kalnay E.Ensemble forecasting at NMC, the generation of perturbation.Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1993, 74:2317-2330. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<2317:EFANTG>2.0.CO;2
    [15]
    Toth Z, Kalnay E.Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method.Mon Wea Rev, 1997, 125:3297-3319. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<3297:EFANAT>2.0.CO;2
    [16]
    Du J, Mullen S L, Sander F.Short-range ensemble forecasting of quantitative precipitation.Mon Wea Rev, 1997, 125(10):2427-2459. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2427:SREFOQ>2.0.CO;2
    [17]
    高峰, 闵锦忠, 孔凡铀, 等.风暴尺度集合成员数对预报技巧的影响.南京气象学院学报, 2009, 32(2):215-221. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJQX200902008.htm
    [18]
    王晨稀, 端义宏.短期集合预报技术在梅雨降水预报中的试验研究.应用气象学报, 2003, 14(1):69-78. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20030108&flag=1
    [19]
    谭燕, 陈德辉.基于非静力模式物理扰动的中尺度集合预报试验.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3):396-406. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070365&flag=1
    [20]
    李俊, 杜钧, 刘羽.北京"7.21"特大暴雨不同集合预报方案的对比试验.气象学报, 2015, 73(1):50-71. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2015.008
    [21]
    张诚忠, 陈子通, 万齐林, 等.雷达反演水汽在华南前汛期短时临近降水预报应用试验.热带气象学报, 2014, 30(5):801-810. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX201405001.htm
    [22]
    李俊, 杜钧, 王明欢, 等.中尺度暴雨集合预报系统研发中的初值扰动试验.高原气象, 2009, 28(6):1365-1375. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX200906017.htm
    [23]
    李俊, 杜钧, 陈超君."频率匹配法"在集合降水预报中的应用:集合平均、偏差订正及它们的结合.气象, 2015, 41(6):674-685. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2015.06.002
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (3186) PDF downloads(903) Cited by()
    • Received : 2015-03-25
    • Accepted : 2015-06-10
    • Published : 2015-11-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint