Yun Wenli, Hou Qiong, Li Jianjun, et al. Yield prediction of sunflower based on crop coefficient and water production function. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(6): 705-713. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150607.
Citation: Yun Wenli, Hou Qiong, Li Jianjun, et al. Yield prediction of sunflower based on crop coefficient and water production function. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(6): 705-713. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150607.

Yield Prediction of Sunflower Based on Crop Coefficient and Water Production Function

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150607
  • Received Date: 2015-01-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-07-22
  • Publish Date: 2015-11-30
  • Crop coefficient and water production function are important parameters for water saving irrigation. Through making use of data from the stage sowing test at Bayannaoer (40°45′N, 107°25′E, elevation 1039.3 m) of Inner Mongolia in 2012 and historical agro-meteorological data from two monitoring stations, most of the research is carried out in accordance with yield prediction methods based on crop coefficient and water production function. As far as results are concerned, variations in the standard sunflower crop are small in the early stage, large in the medium stage and small again in the late stage. The peak value (1.21) presents itself in the blossom period. There are strong quadratic and cubic polynomial relationships amongst standard crop coefficients days after germination and positive accumulated temperature values (determination coefficient is 0.93). Through comparison with FAO recommended stage values, standard crop coefficient from the test computing is reasonable. In addition, when calibration methods of standard crop coefficient and relative leaf area index are put forward, the actual evapo-transpiration of water production function can be calculated, and dynamic calculation equations of sunflower crop coefficient in the irrigated districts are obtained. There is a quadratic parabola relationship between sunflower water consumption and yield with a suitable water consumption limit. The suitable water consumption threshold is about 400-460 mm, and the yield is 496.7-500.6 g·m-2. Moreover, when water supply is adequate, the water requirement of sunflowers during the entire growth period is 450 mm with an average frequency of 4.09 mm/d. The regular water requirement pattern indicates that minimum water is required during seeding stage, medium water is required during two pairs of true leaves-inflorescence formation stage and blossom-maturity stage, and maximum water is required during inflorescence formation-blossom stage. Additionally, when Jensen model is put forward and established through comparison with 4 sensitive indexes, the order of water deficit from high to low is blossom period, inflorescence formation period, maturity period and seeding period, which is consistent with the regular water requirement pattern. Through integrated utilization of sunflower crop coefficient equation and water production function model, the stage sowing production and production are obtained (504.36g·m-2 and 493.83 g·m-2, respectively), which show 4.4% and 4.1% deviations with actual production, respectively. There is preliminary evidence that the prediction method of production proposed is relatively reasonable with a great applicability in this region, and can be further applied to pre-assessment of production affected by water deficit in different stages.

  • Fig. 1  Relationship of standard crop coefficient to date of year

    Fig. 2  Relationship of standard crop coefficient to accumulated temperature greater than 0℃

    Fig. 3  Relationship of crop coefficient to relative leaf area index

    Fig. 4  Relationship of total water consumption to total yield

    Fig. 5  Comparison of calculated and actual yields

    Fig. 6  Comparison of Jensen model calculated and actual yields

    Table  1  Dynamic simulating equations of standard crop coefficient and leaf area index in Hetao irrigated area underappropriate conditions of water

    参数 模拟方程式 R2 样本量
    标准作物系数 Kc=-2E-10Tj3+8E-0.7Tj2-0.0005Tj+0.2638 0.927 26
    Kc=-0.0002D2+0.1011D-9.5528 0.949 26
    叶面积指数 LAID=-3E-0.9Tj3+2E-0.5Tj2-0.0276Tj+14.236 0.965 24
    注:D表示日序,150 < D < 270;Tj表示大于0℃积温,850℃ < Tj < 3600℃;LAID为水分适宜条件下期望的叶面积指数。
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  Compared with FAO recommended values and standard crop coefficient

    生育阶段 初期 前期 中期 后期 收获期 全生育期
    (始末日序) (148—164) (165—188) (189—243) (244—253) (254—271) (110)
    FAO推荐值 0.3~0.4 0.7~0.8 1.05~1.2 0.7~0.8 0.35~0.45 0.75~0.85
    标准作物系数 0.41 0.80 1.1 0.80 0.41 0.78
    计算阈值 0.33~0.49 0.67~0.94 0.97~1.21 0.7~0.85 0.24~0.55
    注:初期:播种-出苗;前期:出苗至13,14片叶;中期:13,14片叶至开花后1周;后期:开花后1周至开花后20 d;收获期:开花后20 d至成熟。
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  3  Water requirement of sunflower in different growth stages

    生育阶段 出苗期-二对真叶期 二对真叶期-花序形成期 花序形成期-开花期 开花期-成熟期 全生育期
    间隔时间/d 9 27 20 45 110
    需水量/mm 5 95 190 160 450
    时段需水量占总需水量比/% 1.11 21.11 42.22 35.56 100
    日耗水强度/(mm·d-1) 0.56 3.52 9.50 3.56 4.09
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  4  Sensitive index and parametric test of sunflower crop water production function in Hetao irrigated area (n=18)

    模型 生育期 相关系数 平均相对误差/%
    苗期 花序形成期 开花期 成熟期
    Jensen 0.001 0.0648 0.1567 0.0391 0.806* 10.78
    Minhas -0.0474 0.0587 0.1412 0.2247 0.652* 17.91
    Blank 0.0379 0.1882 0.6426 0.2945 0.700* 32.03
    Singh 0.1646 0.0577 0.5170 0.4687 0.742* 41.69
    注:*表示达到0.01显著性水平。
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  5  Calculation of crop coefficient equation and water production function model and yield prediction

    播期 参数 出苗期-二对真叶期 二对真叶期-花序形成期 花序形成期-开花期 开花期-成熟期 计算产量/ (g·m-2) 实际产量/ (g·m-2)
    05-20 Kc 0.45 0.78 1.08 0.19
    Kcx 0.03 0.82 1.67 0.50
    ETa 1.48 129.44 157.80 122.93 504.36 527.24
    06-04 Kc 0.65 0.90 1.14 0.25
    Kcx 0.04 0.70 1.90 0.64
    ETa 1.32 98.64 155.72 121.22 493.83 514.07
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    云文丽, 李建军, 侯琼.土壤水分对向日葵生长状况的影响.干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(2): 186-190. doi:  10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.02.029
    [2]
    王叔同, 张荣霞, 张敏.基于长时段非线性影响分析的冬小麦产量预报.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(3):377-382. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000355&flag=1
    [3]
    魏瑞江, 宋迎波, 王鑫.基于气候适宜度的玉米产量动态预报方法.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(5):622-627. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20090514
    [4]
    刘振忠, 徐梅.三江平原地区粮食产量预报模型研究.农业工程学报, 1999, 15(4): 14-18. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU199904002.htm
    [5]
    刘春, 张春辉, 郭萨萨.基于能量模型的水稻生长模型.应用气象学报, 2013, 24(2): 240-247. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20130212
    [6]
    帅细强, 王石立, 马玉平, 等.基于水稻生长模型的气象影响评价和产量动态预测.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(1):71-81. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20080112
    [7]
    熊伟.CERES-Wheat模型在我国小麦区的应用效果及误差来源.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(1):88-94. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20090111
    [8]
    刘钰, Pereira L S.对FAO推荐的作物系数计算方法的验证.农业工程学报, 2000, 16(5): 26-30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU200005006.htm
    [9]
    王笑影, 梁文举, 闻大中.北方稻田蒸散需水分析及其作物系数确定.应用生态学报, 2005, 16(1):69-72. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB200501014.htm
    [10]
    刘海军, 康跃虎.冬小麦拔节抽穗期作物系数的研究.农业工程学报, 2006, 22(10):52-56. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2006.10.011
    [11]
    李玉霖, 崔建垣, 张铜会.奈曼地区灌溉麦田蒸散量及作物系数的确定.应用生态学报, 2003, 14(6):930-934. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB200306020.htm
    [12]
    王宇, 周广胜.雨养玉米农田生态系统的蒸散特征及其作物系数.应用生态学报, 2010, 21(3):647-653. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB201003018.htm
    [13]
    陈凤, 蔡焕杰, 王健, 等.杨凌地区冬小麦和夏玉米蒸发蒸腾和作物系数的确定.农业工程学报, 2006, 22(5):191-193. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU200605041.htm
    [14]
    戴佳信, 史海滨, 田德龙, 等.内蒙古河套灌区主要粮油作物系数的确定.灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(3):23-27. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGPS201103005.htm
    [15]
    Vu S H, Watanabe H, Takagi K.Application of FAO-56 for evaluating evapotranspiration in simulation of pollutant runoff from paddy rice field in Japan.Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 76:195-210. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2005.01.012
    [16]
    Sentelhas P C, Gillespie T J, Santos E A.Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada.Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97: 635-644. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001
    [17]
    刘增进, 李宝萍, 李远华, 等.冬小麦水分利用效率与最优灌溉制度的研究.农业工程学报, 2004, 20(4):58-63. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU200404013.htm
    [18]
    迟道才, 王瑄, 夏桂敏, 等.北方水稻动态水分生产函数研究.农业工程学报, 2004, 20(3):30-34. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU200403007.htm
    [19]
    华北平原作物水分胁迫与干旱研究课题组.作物水分胁迫与干旱研究.郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 1991.
    [20]
    Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al.Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements.FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56.Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 1998.
    [21]
    Chiew F H S, Kamadalasa N N, Malano H M, et al.Penman-Monteith, FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiraion and class-a pan data in Australia.Agricultural Water Management, 1995, 28: 9-12. doi:  10.1016/0378-3774(95)01172-F
    [22]
    David M S, Jenifer M J.Utility of Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor, reference evapotranspiraion, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiraion.J Hydrol, 2005, 308: 81-104. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.023
    [23]
    Jensen E. 耗水量与灌溉需水量. 马文, 译. 北京: 农业出版社, 1982.
    [24]
    王玉娟, 杨胜天, 刘昌明, 等.植被生态用水结果及绿水资源消耗效用--以黄河三门峡地区为例.地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 74-84. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYJ200901009.htm
    [25]
    王立坤, 单玉芬, 马永胜, 等.黑龙江省西部半干旱区向日葵水分生产函数试验研究.东北农林大学学报, 2009, 40(4): 33-36. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10224-2010263611.htm
    [26]
    吕厚荃, 张玉书, 王建林, 等. 农业干旱等级 (审定稿). GB/T-2009, 2009.
    [27]
    侯琼, 王英舜, 师桂花, 等.内蒙古典型草原作物系数的试验研究.草业学报, 2011, 20(4):34-41. doi:  10.11686/cyxb20110405
    [28]
    刘浩, 孙景生, 梁媛媛, 等.温室滴灌条件下土壤水分亏缺对番茄产量及其形成过程的影响.应用生态学报, 2011, 22(5):1201-1206. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB200911017.htm
    [29]
    侯琼, 沈建国.内蒙古主要灌区春小麦、春玉米农田优化灌溉指标研究.干旱地区农业研究, 2001, 19(1): 33-39. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ200101005.htm
    [30]
    云文丽, 侯琼, 王海梅, 等.不同土壤水分对向日葵光合光响应的影响.应用气象学报, 2014, 25(4):476-482. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20140411
    [31]
    翟胜, 梁银丽, 王巨媛, 等.干旱半干旱地区日光温室黄瓜水分生产函数的研究.农业工程学报, 2005, 21(4): 136-139. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU200504030.htm
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

    Article views (4916) PDF downloads(998) Cited by()
    • Received : 2015-01-05
    • Accepted : 2015-07-22
    • Published : 2015-11-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint