Vol.29, NO.3, 2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Applied Meteorological Science  > 2018  >  29(3): 257-269
Ma Suhong, Zhang Jin, Shen Xueshun, et al. The upgrade of GRAPE_TYM in 2016 and its impacts on tropical cyclone prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(3): 257-269. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180301.
Citation: Ma Suhong, Zhang Jin, Shen Xueshun, et al. The upgrade of GRAPE_TYM in 2016 and its impacts on tropical cyclone prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(3): 257-269. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180301.
shu

The Upgrade of GRAPE_TYM in 2016 and Its Impacts on Tropical Cyclone Prediction

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20180301
  • 1.

    National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081

  • 2.

    University of Hawaii, Hawaii 96822, USA

  • Received Date: 2017-07-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-02-26
  • Publish Date: 2018-05-31
    Abstract
  • The model reference profile and the vortex initialization scheme in GRAPES_TYM of China National Meteorological Center are modified in 2016 to improve the ability of tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity prediction.The reference atmosphere profile is often applied in numerical weather prediction model to guarantee model integration stability and the accuracy. The reference atmosphere profile of isothermal temperature is replaced by a profile based on the horizontal mean of the model initial condition in GRAPES_TYM. It could decrease the amplitude of the perturbation of potential temperature and pressure and increase the accuracy and stability of model integration.The TC vortex initialization is a key factor to TC track and intensity numerical prediction. The TC vortex initialization scheme in GRAPES_TYM includes two parts:Vortex relocation (the vortex in the analyzed field is moved to the location analyzed by forecasters) and intensity correction. The modification of vortex initialization scheme includes two aspects:The relocation of vortex is removed, the radius of correction of the intensity is reduced to 4° from 12° in order to weaken the influence on the outer circulation of TC, which is assumed well analyzed by global model with higher resolution that provides the initial and boundary conditions for regional model.Experiments are carried out twice a day using 2014-2016 main TCs which last more than 72 h. Results show that upgrade of reference atmosphere profile could reduce the northward bias and the mean track errors especially for the mid-turning typhoon around 140°E. The modification of the radius of the intensity correction from 12° to 4° could improve TC track prediction especially for 0-72 h. GRAPES_TYM with the upgrade of reference profile and vortex initialization scheme could reduce the mean track errors by 10%(24 h), 12%(48 h), 16%(72 h), 14(96 h), and 15%(120 h) compared with the operational system.Results from 2014-2016 are also compared with results of NCEP global forecast system (NCEP-GFS). Mean track errors of GRAPES_TYM are larger than those. The track error differences are 9.2 km(24 h), 17.2 km(48 h), 18.4 km(72 h), 41.1 km(96 h) and 60.3 km(120 h), which are generally within 50 km except for 120 h prediction. GRAPES_TYM performs better than NCEP-GFS for TCs moving westward or northwestward and landing at the coast of China. The mean TC intensity errors of GRAPES_TYM within 72 h are smaller than those of NCEP-GFS.It can be found from the above results that the regional model improvements are more important for TC track prediction compared with improvements of model initial conditions which come from the global model, especially when the resolution of global model get higher and more data are assimilated. Therefore, more efforts should be put into the regional model optimization and improvement in the future.
    • FullText(HTML)
    References(24)

  • Fig. 1  Vertical profile of mean perturbation of potential temperature and Exner pressure based on isothermal atmosphere and initial state mean reference profiles at 1200 UTC 14 Oct 2015(the mean perturbation is averaged between 90°-170°E at 22°N)(a)perturbation of potential temperature, (b)perturbation of Exner pressure

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 2  Cross-section of surface level pressure increment from different radius of intensity modification along tropical cyclone (TC) center

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 3  Mean track error(a), bias of cross-track(b) and skill(c)

    (TYM:operational model; TYM_REF:upgrade of reference profile; REF_VTX:update of vortex initialization based on the upgrade of atmospheric reference profile)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 4  Distributions of track errors

    (a)48 h tracks of operational model, (b)120 h tracks of operational model, (c)48 h tracks of initial condition mean reference profile upgrade, (d)120 h tracks of initial condition mean reference profile upgrade, (e)48 h tracks of the vortex initialization upgrade, (f)48 h tracks of the vortex initialization upgrade

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 5  Mean error and bias of maximum wind speed at 10 m

    (a)mean error, (b)bias, (c)relative skill

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 6  Forecast tracks of Typhoon Champi(2015)

    (black: best track; colors: forecast tracks with different initial time with interval of 12 h, i.e., 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC) (a)operational model, (b)upgrade of initial condition mean profile, (c)upgrade of vortex initialization based on upgraded reference profile

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 7  Mean track error(a) and bias of cross-track error(b)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 8  Maximum 10 m wind of Typhoon Champi (1525)

    (black:best track; colors:forecast tracks with different initial time with interval of 12 h, i.e., 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC) (a)operational model, (b)upgrade of initial condition mean profile, (c)upgrade of vortex initialization based on upgraded reference profile

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 9  Mean error(a) and bias(b) of maximum wind speed at 10 m

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 10  Mean track errors(a) and maximum wind speed errors(b)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 11  Distribution of TC track errors

    (a)72 h forecast tracks of NCEP-GFS, (b)72 h forecast tracks of GRAPES_TYM, (c)120 h forecast track of NCEP-GFS, (d)120 h forecast tracks of GRAPES_TYM

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
  • [1]
    杨兆礼, 陈子通.区域模式参考大气扰动量算法的预报试验.热带气象学报, 2014, 30(6):1107-1112. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-RDQX201406011.htm
    [2]
    张红亮, 黄丽萍, 陈嘉宾.一种依赖初始场构造的参考大气廓线及对高原地区预报的影响.高原气象, 1996, 15(4):490-495. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gyqx200901002
    [3]
    陈子通, 戴光丰, 钟水新, 等.中国南海台风模式(TRAMS-V2.0)技术特点及其预报性能.热带气象学报, 2016, 32(6):831-840. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Column/Paper?q=%e5%85%b3%e9%94%ae%e8%af%8d%3a%22%e6%95%b0%e5%80%bc%e9%a2%84%e6%8a%a5%22+DBID%3aWF_QK&f=sort&o=sortby+relevance
    [4]
    Liu Qingfu, Tim Marehok, Pan Hualu, et al. Inprovements in Hurricane Initialization and Forecasting at NCEP with Global and Regional (GFDL) Model. Technical Procedures Bulletin, NOAA, SN: 472, 2000.
    [5]
    瞿安祥, 麻素红, Liu Q F, 等.全球数值模式中的台风初始化Ⅰ:方案设计.气象学报, 2009, 67(5):716-726. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2009.072
    [6]
    瞿安祥, 麻素红, 李娟, 等.全球数值模式中的台风初始化Ⅱ:业务应用.气象学报, 2009, 67(5):727-735. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2009.073
    [7]
    瞿安祥, 麻素红, 张进, 等.T639全球模式的台风涡旋初始化方案升级试验.气象, 2016, 42(6):664-673. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.06.002
    [8]
    Ueno M.A study on the impact of Asymmetric components around tropical cyclone center on the accuracy of Bogus data and the track forecast.Meteor Atmos Phy, 1995, 56(1-2):125-134. doi:  10.1007/BF01022525
    [9]
    吴俞, 麻素红, 肖天贵, 等.T213L31模式热带气旋路径数值预报误差分析.应用气象学报, 2011, 22(2):182-193. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20110207
    [10]
    麻素红, 吴俞, 瞿安祥, 等.T213与T639模式热带气旋预报误差对比.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(2):167-173. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20120205
    [11]
    鲁小琴, 雷小途, 余晖, 等.基于卫星资料进行热带气旋强度客观估算.应用气象学报, 2014, 25(1):52-58. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20140106
    [12]
    程正泉, 林良勋, 杨国杰, 等.超强台风威马逊快速增强及大尺度环流特征.应用气象学报, 2017, 28(3):318-326. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20170306
    [13]
    任强, 董佩明, 薛纪善.台风数值预报中受云影响微波卫星资料的同化试验.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(2):137-146. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20090202
    [14]
    Wang Y Q.On the bogusing of tropical cyclones in numerical models:The influence of vertical structure.Meteorol Atmos Phy, 1998, 65(3):153-170.
    [15]
    黄小刚, 费建芳, 陈佩燕.利用神经网络方法建立热带气旋强度预报模型.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(6):699-705. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20090607
    [16]
    麻素红, 吴俞, 瞿安祥, 等.T213与T639模式热带气旋预报误差对比.应用气象学报, 2012, 23(2):167-173. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20120205
    [17]
    Nguyan H V, Chen Y L.High resolution initialization and simulations of Typhoon Morakot (2009).Mon Wea Rev, 2011, 139(3):1463-1491.
    [18]
    张进, 麻素红, 陈德辉.GRAPES_TYM改进及其在2013年在西北太平洋及南海台风预报中的表现.热带气象学报, 2017, 33(1):64-72.
    [19]
    陈德辉, 王诗文, 汪厚君.改进的物理过程参数化对台风路径数值预报的影响.应用气象学报, 1996, 7(1):1-8. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960101&flag=1
    [20]
    黄伟, 梁旭东.台风涡旋循环初始化方法及其在GRAPES-TCM中的应用.气象学报, 2010, 68(3):365-375. doi:  10.11676/qxxb2010.036
    [21]
    Cha D H, Wang Y.A dynamical initialization scheme for real-time forecasts of tropical cyclones using the WRF model.Mon Wea Rev, 2013, 141(3):964-986. doi:  10.1175/MWR-D-12-00077.1
    [22]
    Hendricks E A, Peng M S, Li T.Evaluation of multiple dynamic initialization schemes for tropical cyclone prediction.Mon Wea Rev, 2013, 141(11):4028-4048. doi:  10.1175/MWR-D-12-00329.1
    [23]
    Kurihara Y, Bender M A, Tuleya R E, et al.Improvements in the GFDL hurricane prediction system.Mon Wea Rev, 1995, 123:2791-2801. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<2791:IITGHP>2.0.CO;2
    [24]
    Wang Yuqing.An inverse balance equation in sigma coordinates for model initialization.Mon Wea Rev, 1995, 123:482-488. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<0482:AIBEIS>2.0.CO;2
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(11)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (2854) PDF downloads(284) Cited by()
    • Received : 2017-07-31
    • Accepted : 2018-02-26
    • Published : 2018-05-31
    Journal Online
    Contact

    © 2020 Journal of Applied Meteorological Science   京ICP备15006967号-1

    Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return