Hong Wei, Zheng Yulan. A method of short-time strong rainfall forecasting during pre-rainy season in Fujian based on ECMWF productions. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(5): 584-595. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180507.
Citation: Hong Wei, Zheng Yulan. A method of short-time strong rainfall forecasting during pre-rainy season in Fujian based on ECMWF productions. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(5): 584-595. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180507.

A Method of Short-time Strong Rainfall Forecasting During Pre-rainy Season in Fujian Based on ECMWF Productions

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20180507
  • Received Date: 2018-01-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-05-18
  • Publish Date: 2018-09-30
  • Distribution features of model variables accompanied with short-time strong rainfall events are investigated based on hourly precipitation data from 1605 automatic weather stations and ECMWF 0.125°×0.125° fine grid model products, and a method of short-time strong rainfall forecasting based on threshold determination is established. Results show that short-time strong rainfall occur more frequently in Fujian inland area and less in Fujian coastal area during pre-rainy season, and the diurnal variation exhibits double peaks with the notable one at 1700 BT and the inapparent one at 0500 BT. The box difference index is useful to check whether a variable could differentiate short-time strong rainfall events well. The box difference index of humidity variables like specific humidity at 925 hPa and total column water vapor are most prominent followed by K index and convective available potential energy (CAPE) which shows these variables have good performances in distinguishing short-time strong rainfall events. Some variables like temperature difference between 850 hPa and 500 hPa and temperature change in 24 h at 500 hPa perform poorly in differentiating short-time strong rainfall events.The minimum threshold method based on the minimum values of variables after eliminating outliers works well in judging short-time strong rainfall events, which could decrease vacancy forecast rate effectively through increasing missing forecast rate appropriately compared with adopting real minimum values as threshold. In the key area (25.9°-27.1°N, 116.4°-117.4°E), TS (threaten score) of validation set in 2016 with 12 h interval reaches 0.5 at daytime and 0.3 at nighttime just based on the minimum threshold method. Revising threshold of variables with high box difference index values could improve the accuracy with the nighttime TS of validation set in 2016 increasing from 0.3 to 0.34. TS of 2016 is relatively lower compared with that of 2014-2015, and the cause may be that short-time strong rainfalls happen much more frequently in 2016 which is a very strong El Niño year.To establish a potential forecast model of short-time strong rainfall during pre-rainy season, Fujian is divided into grids of 1°×1°, and minimum threshold method is applied in each grid followed by threshold revise of variables with high box difference index values. This model could analyze all kinds of variables comprehensively besides those considered by weather forecasters. TS with 12 h interval at daytime mainly ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 while TS at nighttime is relatively lower. TS in inland area is much better than coastal area both at daytime and nighttime mainly because short-time strong rainfall occurs more frequently in inland area than coastal area during pre-rainy season climatologically.
  • Fig. 1  The spatial distribution(a) and diurnal variation(b) of short-time strong rainfall events during pre-rainy season from 2009-2016 in Fujian

    (black box denotes the key area)

    Fig. 2  The boxplot of K index with short-time strong rainfall happened or not at nighttime during pre-rainy season in 2014-2015

    (the black point denotes the outlier)

    Fig. 3  The boxplot of ECMWF variables with short-time strong rainfall happened or not at daytime during pre-rainy season from 2014-2015

    (the black point denotes the outlier)

    Fig. 4  TS at daytime(a) and nighttime(b) varied with Ibd threshold and variable percentile threshold with time interval of 3 h during pre-rainy season in 2014-2015

    Fig. 5  TS of short-time strong rainfall prediction during pre-rainy season with time interval of 12 h

    (a)daytime in 2014-2015, (b)nighttime in 2014-2015, (c)daytime in 2016, (d)nighttime in 2016

    Fig. 6  The forecast of short-time strong rainfall with method in this study(a) and 12 h precipitation from ECMWF(b) at nighttime on 9 May 2016

    Table  1  Ibd of variables in the key area

    物理量 Ibd
    白天 夜间
    整层可降水量 0.44 0.49
    925 hPa比湿 0.44 0.43
    3 h降水量 0.42 0.49
    850 hPa比湿 0.42 0.43
    925 hPa露点 0.41 0.40
    500 hPa垂直速度 0.39 0.40
    850 hPa露点 0.37 0.35
    K指数 0.36 0.35
    对流有效位能 0.33 0.42
    海平面气压 0.30 0.32
    700 hPa垂直速度 0.29 0.36
    500 hPa位势高度 0.28 0.23
    850 hPa散度 0.22 0.19
    200 hPa散度 0.16 0.23
    850 hPa与500 hPa温差 0.14 0.06
    500 hPa 24 h变温 0.04 0.03
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  The forecast verificaiton of short-time strong rainfall in the key area only using minimum threshold method

    时段 2014—2015年 2016年
    N1 N2 N3 N4 TS评分 N1 N2 N3 N4 TS评分
    白天时段(3 h时间分辨率) 95 25 189 419 0.307 36 31 121 176 0.191
    夜间时段(3 h时间分辨率) 59 13 230 426 0.195 24 27 114 199 0.145
    白天时段(12 h时间分辨率) 51 16 31 84 0.520 31 10 20 30 0.508
    夜间时段(12 h时间分辨率) 31 9 60 82 0.310 17 10 29 35 0.303
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  3  The same as in Table 2, but revising the threshold of convective available potential energy and 3 h preicipitation on the basis of minimum threshold method

    时段 2014—2015年 2016年
    N1 N2 N3 N4 TS评分 N1 N2 N3 N4 TS评分
    白天时段(3 h时间分辨率) 86 34 150 458 0.319 33 34 92 205 0.208
    夜间时段(3 h时间分辨率) 50 22 101 555 0.289 14 37 45 268 0.146
    白天时段(12 h时间分辨率) 48 19 25 90 0.522 30 11 18 32 0.508
    夜间时段(12 h时间分辨率) 30 10 36 106 0.395 14 13 14 50 0.341
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  4  The same as in Table 2, but verification of Shanghai Typhoon Institute-WRF ADAS Real-time Modeling System in the key area with data of 2016

    时段 2016年
    N1 N2 N3 N4 TS评分
    白天时段(3 h时间分辨率) 16 51 32 265 0.161
    夜间时段(3 h时间分辨率) 16 35 27 286 0.205
    白天时段(12 h时间分辨率) 20 21 10 40 0.392
    夜间时段(12 h时间分辨率) 9 18 9 55 0.250
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    Zhang H, Zhai P M.Temporal and spatial characteristics of extreme hourly precipitation over eastern China in the warm season.Adv Atmos Sci, 2011, 28(5):1177-1183. doi:  10.1007/s00376-011-0020-0
    [2]
    韩宁, 苗春生.近6年陕甘宁三省5-9月短时强降水统计特征.应用气象学报, 2013, 23(6):691-701. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120606&flag=1
    [3]
    何晗, 谌芸, 肖天贵, 等.冷涡背景下短时强降水的统计分析.气象, 2015, 41(12):1466-1476. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2015.12.004
    [4]
    阿不力克木, 王元, 王亦平, 等.一次强对流天气及其中短时强降水的成因分析.气象科学, 2014, 34(4):457-464. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=QXKX201404015&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [5]
    段鹤, 夏文梅, 苏晓力, 等.短时强降水特征统计及临近预警.气象, 2014, 40(10):1194-1206. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2014.10.004
    [6]
    史锐, 程明虎, 崔哲虎, 等.用反射率因子垂直廓线联合雨量计校准估测夏季区域强降水.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(6):737-745. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2005.06.004
    [7]
    郜彦娜, 何立富.2011年7月12-20日华北冷涡阶段性特.应用气象学报, 2013, 24(6):704-713. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2013.06.007
    [8]
    陈明轩, 俞小鼎, 谭晓光, 等.北京2004年"7.11"突发性对流强降水的雷达回波特征分析.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(3):333-345. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.03.011
    [9]
    常煜, 马素艳, 仲夏.内蒙古夏季典型短时强降水中尺度特征.应用气象学报, 2018, 29(2):232-244. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20180209&flag=1
    [10]
    陈炯, 郑永光, 张小玲, 等.中国暖季短时强降水分布和日变化特征及其与中尺度对流系统日变化关系分析.气象学报, 2013, 71(3):367-382. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=QXXB201303003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [11]
    陈秋萍, 陈敏艳, 刘爱鸣, 等.登陆福建热带气旋短时强降水特征.气象研究与应用, 2016, 37(3):24-28. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1673-8411.2016.03.013
    [12]
    魏晓雯, 梁萍, 何金海.上海地区不同类型短时强降水的大尺度环流背景特征分析.气象与环境科学, 2016, 39(2):69-75. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=HNQX201602010&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [13]
    杨波, 孙继松, 毛旭, 等.北京地区短时强降水过程的多尺度环流特征.气象学报, 2016, 74(6):919-934. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=QXXB201606008&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [14]
    许爱华, 孙继松, 许东蓓, 等.中国中东部强对流天气的天气形势分类和基本要素配置特征.气象, 2014, 40(4):400-411. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-1742.2014.04.013
    [15]
    仇娟娟, 何立富.苏沪浙地区短时强降水与冰雹天气分布及物理量特征对比分析.气象, 2013, 39(5):577-584. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1674-7097.2013.05.008
    [16]
    何立富, 周庆亮, 谌芸, 等.国家级强对流潜势预报业务进展与检验评估.气象, 2011, 37(7):777-784. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=QXXX201107002&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [17]
    樊李苗, 俞小鼎.中国短时强对流天气的若干环境参数特征分析.高原气象, 2013, 32(1):156-165. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=GYQX201301017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [18]
    庞古乾, 伍志方, 叶爱芬, 等.珠三角地区前后汛期强对流过程物理量指数对比分析及阈值选取.热带气象学报, 2012, 28(6):919-923. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/rdqxxb201206014
    [19]
    Doswell Ⅲ C A, Brooks H E, Maddox R A.Flash flood forecasting:An ingredients-based methodology.Wea Forecasting, 1996, 11(4):560-581. doi:  10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011<0560:FFFAIB>2.0.CO;2
    [20]
    沈澄, 孙燕, 魏晓奕, 等.基于物理量参数的江苏短时强降水预报模型的研究.气象, 2016, 42(5):557-566. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qx201605005
    [21]
    田付友, 郑永光, 张涛, 等.短时强降水诊断物理量敏感性的点对面检验.应用气象学报, 2015, 26(4):385-396. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150401&flag=1
    [22]
    张莹, 袁志勇, 徐春阳, 等.短时强降水历史个例查询与潜势预报平台.气象科学, 2012, 32(12):149-154. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxkx2011z1024
    [23]
    谌志刚, 张羽, 刘云香, 等.基于天气形势分型的珠江三角洲强对流潜势预报方法.气象科技, 2017, 45(3):460-468. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxkj201703010
    [24]
    曾明剑, 王桂臣, 吴海英, 等.基于中尺度数值模式的分类强对流天气预报方法研究.气象学报, 2015, 73(5):868-882. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201505005
    [25]
    雷蕾, 孙继松, 王国荣, 等.基于中尺度数值模式快速循环系统的强对流天气分类概率预报试验.气象学报, 2012, 70(4):752-765. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201204012
    [26]
    吴启树, 韩美, 郭弘, 等.MOS温度预报中最优训练期方案.应用气象学报, 2016, 27(4):426-434. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160405&flag=1
    [27]
    吴启树, 韩美, 刘铭, 等.基于评分最优化的模式降水预报订正算法对比.应用气象学报, 2017, 28(3):306-317. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170305&flag=1
    [28]
    伍红雨, 杨崧, 蒋兴文.华南前汛期开始日期异常与大气环流和海温变化的关系.气象学报, 2015, 73(2):319-330. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201502008
    [29]
    林爱兰, 李春晖, 郑彬, 等.广东前汛期持续性暴雨的变化特征及其环流形势.气象学报, 2013, 71(4):628-642. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qxxb201304004
    [30]
    Fu B, Peng M S, Li T, et al.Developing versus nondeveloping disturbances for tropical cyclone formation.Part Ⅱ:Western North Pacific.Mon Wea Rev, 2012, 140(4):1067-1080. doi:  10.1175/2011MWR3618.1
    [31]
    唐文苑, 周庆亮, 刘鑫华, 等.国家级强对流天气分类预报检验分析.气象, 2017, 43(1):67-76. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qx201701007
    [32]
    毕宝贵, 张小玲, 代刊.2016年超强厄尔尼诺背景下的强对流和极端降水天气特点.科学通报, 2017, 62(9):928-937. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20172017041000111339
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(6)  / Tables(4)

    Article views (3540) PDF downloads(262) Cited by()
    • Received : 2018-01-16
    • Accepted : 2018-05-18
    • Published : 2018-09-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint