Chen Hui, Lin Jing, Yang Kai, et al. Construction and application of climate quality evaluation model for Indian jujube. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(4): 443-455. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210406.
Citation: Chen Hui, Lin Jing, Yang Kai, et al. Construction and application of climate quality evaluation model for Indian jujube. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(4): 443-455. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210406.

Construction and Application of Climate Quality Evaluation Model for Indian Jujube

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210406
  • Received Date: 2021-03-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-05-31
  • Publish Date: 2021-07-31
  • In order to adapt and fully utilize climate resources, improve the quality of Indian jujube, and increase the income and economic benefits of fruit farmers, 62 samples of fresh fruit weight, soluble sugar, soluble solids, vitamin C, hardness and other main quality factors are obtained from the field experiments in main production areas of Indian jujube in Fujian and Guangdong from 2015 to 2016. Combining literature review, expert investigation and quantitative grade evaluation standard of conventional agrometeorological conditions, the key climatic factors affecting the quality of Indian jujube are selected, and the grade evaluation model of climatic quality of Indian jujube is established. The temporal and spatial distribution of climate quality of Indian jujube in Fujian is analyzed based on 36 independent samples of main quality and meteorological data in major Indian jujube producing areas of Fujian and Guangdong, Guangxi from 2014 to 2019. The results show that three key climatic factors affecting the quality of Indian jujube are the 90-day average temperature 90 days before harvest, daily temperature range and sunshine hours 30 days before harvest. The accuracy of this evaluation model is 86.3%. The evaluation model can objectively reflect the influence of climate conditions on the quality of Indian jujube. Based on the model analysis, the results show that the climate quality of Indian jujube in Fujian picked in the early and middle stages is better than those picked in the later stages, and the proportion of high-quality jujube in the whole production period can be improved by adjusting the production period. Based on the spatial distribution map of climate quality of Indian jujube in the main picking period obtained from Fujian by the model, the climate quality of Indian jujube in southern region is better than that in central and northern regions. Therefore, the proportion of high-quality Indian jujube in the whole region can be improved by increasing the planting area in the south and reducing the planting area in the north. The results have been applied in the evaluation of climate quality grade of Indian jujube in Fujian for three years.
  • Fig. 1  Climate evaluating indicators of Indian jujube

    Fig. 2  Climate quality index of Indian jujube

    Fig. 3  Climate quality index of Indian jujube in 2017/2018

    Fig. 4  Climate quality of Indian jujube in different picking period in Fujian

    Table  1  Field observation sites for Indian jujube

    站点 观测年份 树龄/a 地理位置 海拔高度/m
    平和县山格镇 2014—2019 10 24.4°N,117.4°E 29.4
    南靖县船场镇 2014—2019 15 24.5°N,117.4°E 152.7
    长泰县陈巷镇 2014—2019 8 24.7°N,117.8°E 13.0
    漳浦县石榴镇 2014—2019 10 24.0°N,117.4°E 63.0
    丰顺果园 2014—2019 12 23.9°N,116.3°E 45.4
    潮州铁铺 2014—2019 10 23.8°N,116.6°E 10.9
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  Quality factors of Indian jujube in Fujian and Guangdong

    统计量 单果重/g 可溶性固形物/% 可溶性糖/% 硬度/(kg/cm2) pH值
    平均值 88.89 11.36 10.83 10.99 4.75
    最大值 154.77 14.21 13.78 14.87 5.72
    最小值 47.76 8.42 7.89 8.18 4.22
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  3  Quality grade of Indian jujube

    指标 特优(等级值为3) 优(等级值为2) 良(等级值为1) 一般(等级值为0)
    W/g W≥100 100>W≥75 75>W≥50 W<50
    SS/% SS≥12.0 12.0>SS≥10.5 10.5>SS≥9.0 SS<9.0
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  4  Grade assignment of evaluating indicator of Indian jujube

    M 采收前90 d平均气温Tavg/℃ 采收前30 d平均日较差ΔT/℃ 采收前30 d平均日照时数S/h
    3 Tavg≥18.5 ΔT≥9.0 S≥5.0
    2 15.5≤Tavg<18.5 6.5≤ΔT<9.0 3.5≤S<5.0
    1 13.0≤Tavg<15.5 4.0≤ΔT<6.5 2.0≤S<3.5
    0 Tavg<13.0 ΔT<4.0 S<2.0
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  5  Grade and climate quality index

    评价等级 气候品质评价指数IQ 品质等级对应参考值
    单果重W/g 可溶性固形物含量SS/%
    特优 IQ≥2.5 W≥100 SS≥12.0
    1.5≤IQ<2.5 75≤W < 100 10.5≤SS<12.0
    0.5≤IQ<1.5 50≤W<75 9.0≤SS<10.5
    一般 IQ<0.5 W<50 SS<9.0
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  6  Validation of climate quality evaluation model of Indian jujube from 2014 to 2019

    采果日期 地点 单果重/g 可溶性固形物含量/% 实际品质 IQ 气候品质 等级对比
    2016-12-12 漳浦 89.72 9.60 + 2.1 符合
    2016-12-28 漳浦 91.08 11.37 2.4 符合
    2017-01-19 漳浦 90.67 12.37 特优- 2.1 符合
    2017-11-13 漳浦 82.69 11.63 2.4 符合
    2017-12-14 漳浦 75.63 10.03 + 2.4 符合
    2018-01-23 漳浦 82.41 14.00 特优- 2.3 符合
    2018-02-06 漳浦 80.41 11.07 1.6 符合
    2017-01-19 平和 99.10 11.13 2.0 符合
    2016-12-12 南靖 62.37 7.97 一般+ 2.4 不符合
    2016-12-28 南靖 104.26 8.57 + 2.7 特优 不符合
    2017-01-19 南靖 86.94 12.27 特优- 2.4 符合
    2017-02-09 南靖 82.51 12.23 特优- 2.0 符合
    2017-02-27 南靖 73.79 13.23 + 2.3 符合
    2018-01-23 南靖 87.89 11.87 2.6 特优 不符合
    2018-02-06 南靖 90.31 10.47 + 2.0 符合
    2018-03-12 南靖 83.06 12.33 特优- 1.9 符合
    2019-02-13 南靖 80.11 10.80 1.7 符合
    2019-02-26 南靖 77.08 10.90 1.4 不符合
    2014-01-22 长泰 96.00 12.80 特优- 2.0 符合
    2015-01-26 长泰 110.00 11.80 + 2.0 符合
    2017-02-09 长泰 86.42 10.97 2.0 符合
    2017-02-27 长泰 87.54 14.13 特优- 2.3 符合
    2017-03-14 长泰 88.65 12.93 特优- 2.0 符合
    2018-02-06 长泰 101.96 11.87 + 2.0 符合
    2018-03-12 长泰 89.86 11.73 1.6 符合
    2019-02-13 长泰 78.42 11.50 1.7 符合
    2019-02-26 长泰 70.79 11.60 - 1.4 符合
    2019-01-29 梅州 83.72 11.90 2.0 符合
    2019-02-16 梅州 86.31 12.90 特优- 2.3 符合
    2019-03-10 梅州 56.42 9.30 1.4 符合
    2019-01-26 埔寨 76.99 10.50 2.0 符合
    2019-01-20 南宁 89.35 9.50 + 1.7 符合
    2019-02-14 南宁 95.40 10.90 1.3 不符合
    2019-03-15 南宁 52.52 12.60 + 1.3 不符合
    2019-02-15 武鸣 49.81 12.50 - 0.7 符合
    2019-03-16 武鸣 46.62 12.80 - 0.7 符合
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  7  Climate quality grade and key meteorological factors for Indian jujube harvested in early Jan 2018

    漳州地区 采收前90 d平均气温/℃ 采收前30 d平均日较差/℃ 采收前30 d平均日照时数/h IQ 评级
    东山 20.6 4.3 6.6 2.4
    华安 19.4 10.7 5.7 3.0 特优
    龙海 20.9 8.7 5.4 2.7 特优
    南靖 20.0 10.6 5.6 3.0 特优
    平和 19.6 10.3 5.7 3.0 特优
    芗城 21.1 8.8 4.7 2.4
    云霄 21.3 8.7 5.8 2.7 特优
    漳浦 20.0 9.2 5.8 3.0 特优
    长泰 20.7 9.1 6.1 3.0 特优
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  8  Climate quality grade and key meteorological factors for Indian jujube harvested in early Jan 2019

    漳州地区 采收前90 d平均气温/℃ 采收前30 d平均日较差/℃ 采收前30 d平均日照时数/h IQ 评级
    东山 19.2 3.8 3.9 1.8
    华安 18.1 7.6 2.6 1.7
    龙海 19.6 6.0 2.5 2.1
    南靖 19.1 6.8 2.5 2.1
    平和 18.7 6.6 2.2 1.7
    芗城 19.8 6.0 2.5 2.1
    云霄 20.0 6.0 2.5 2.1
    漳浦 18.8 6.5 2.4 1.7
    长泰 19.3 6.2 2.4 2.1
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    Li X M, Bai Q F, Zhu L. The influence of climate change on suitability of Shaanxi apple growth. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2011, 22(2): 241-248. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2011.02.013
    [2]
    Qu Z J, Zheng X H, Liu L, et al. Relationship between apple quality and meteorological factors in different ecological regions in Shaanxi. Meteorological Monthly, 2017, 43(7): 872-878. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX201707011.htm
    [3]
    Yu Y S, Li G H. A study on the climatic resources and regions of apple quality. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 1995, 6(1): 76-82. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/19950111
    [4]
    Huang Z Y, Zhu Y, Deng Y L, et al. Influence of climate during field growing season on quality of tobacco leaf in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2008, 29(4): 440-445. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2008.04.013
    [5]
    Cheng X, Sun S, Zhang F L, et al. Spatial and temporal distributions of apple drought in northern China. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2020, 31(1): 63-73. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200106
    [6]
    Jin Z F, Wang Z H, Yao Y P, et al. Evaluation of tea climate quality grade in Zhejiang. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(5): 1456-1463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXZ201505040.htm
    [7]
    Guo J P, Wang C Y, Bai Y M. Effects of atmospheric ozone concentration on physiological process and grain quality of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2001, 12(2): 255-261. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2001.02.017
    [8]
    Moretti C L, Mattos L M, Calbo A G, et al. Climate changes and potential impacts on post-harvest quality of fruit and vegetable crops: A review. Food Research International, 2010, 43(7): 1824-1832. doi:  10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.013
    [9]
    Wang C Y, Guo J P, Cui D C, et al. The experimental research about the effects of CO2 enrichment on wheat and corn quality. The Crop Journal, 2000, 26(6): 931-936. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2000.06.045
    [10]
    Guo J P, Gao S H, Liu L. 2001. An experimental study of the impacts of meteorological condition on crops qualities and yield. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2001, 6(1): 361-367. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHYH200103010.htm
    [11]
    Wei Q P, Cheng S H, Dian D. Selection of parameters for evaluating apple quality. China Fruit, 1997(4): 14-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGS704.005.htm
    [12]
    Wang L, Yin S M. Effect of ecological factors on quality of apples. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 1992, 13(4): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNY199204003.htm
    [13]
    Feng M C, Niu B, Yang W D, et al. Climate regionalization of buckwheat quality index based on GIS multivariate analysis in Jinzhong Prefecture. Journal of Geo-Information Sciences, 2012, 14(6): 807-813. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXX201206021.htm
    [14]
    Wang S Z, Zhang L H, Xu X L, et al. Effects of environment on quality of wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 1994, 9(Suppl Ⅰ): 141-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNB1994S1029.htm
    [15]
    Zhu L, Guo Z X, Li H C. Analysis of climatic conditions affecting the quality of Fuji apple and climate division in Shaanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2001, 22(4): 50-53. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2001.04.013
    [16]
    Huang Z Y, Shao Y, Wang S H, et al. Relationships between content of leading chemical components of tobacco leaves and ecological factors in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2007, 28(3): 312-317. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2007.03.019
    [17]
    Huang Z Y, Zhu Y, Wang S H, et al. Relationship between tobacco quality and climates in Yunnan. Resources Science, 2007, 29(2): 83-90. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.02.013
    [18]
    Huang Z Y, Fan L Z, Zhu Y, et al. Climatic division for flue-cured tobacco planting in Yunnan based on GIS and quality of tobacco-leaf. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2009, 30(3): 370-374. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2009.03.017
    [19]
    Yu Y S. Climatic analysis and regionalization of sugar content in Muskmelon. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 1989, 10(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNY198902002.htm
    [20]
    Yu Y S. Analysis of climate index of sugar accumulation in brandy melon. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 1986, 44(2): 247-250. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB198602016.htm
    [21]
    Wang S Z, Liu F K, Zhang L. Ecologic regionalization of wheat quality in Henan Province. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 1995, 24(12): 3-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNNY199511000.htm
    [22]
    Yang K, Chen B B, Chen H. Comprehensive climatic index and grade classification of cold damage for Taiwan green jujube in Fujian. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2020, 31(4): 427-434. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200405
    [23]
    Chen H, Yang K, Li Z, et al. Determination of cold and freezing injury grade indexes for three tropical characteristic fruit trees. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(1): 82-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSKK201801012.htm
    [24]
    Wang C L, Liu J L, Zhou G Y, et al. Research on real-time cold-disaster watching and prediction in Guangdong Province based on GIS technology. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2003, 14(4): 487-495. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2003.04.013
    [25]
    Yang K, Chen H, Li L C, et al. Study on cold and freezing injury grade index in introduction of Zizyphus mauritiana Lam. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2017, 26(4): 91-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH201704011.htm
    [26]
    Gao S H, Lin R N, Huang Z M. Effects of winter temperature and freezing injury on litchi yield in Guangdong Province. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2003, 14(4): 496-498. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2003.04.014
    [27]
    Li L C, Chen F Z, Wang J Y, et al. Climate suitability regionalization for Taiwan green jujube introduction and expansion in Fujian Province using GIS. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(1): 47-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN201701007.htm
    [28]
    Chen J J, Li L C, Lin J, et al. Integrated risk evaluation on meteorological disasters of loquat in Fujian Province. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2014, 25(2): 232-241. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2014.02.013
    [29]
    Xu L, Zhang X J, Wei X Q, et al. Studies on fruit maturity assessment of Indian jujube cv. 'Cuimi' by using Colorimeter method. Southeast Horticulture, 2017(5): 10-12. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.2095-5774.2017.05.003
    [30]
    Xu L, Wei X Q, Zhang X J, et al. Studies on skin color difference of three Indian jujube varietiety. Southeast Horticulture, 2017(5): 1-4. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.2095-5774.2017.05.001
    [31]
    Xu L, Xue W D, Chen T Y, et al. Introduction performance and cultivation main points of jujube with crispy honey leaf in Fujian. China Fruits, 2015(4): 68-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGS201504030.htm
    [32]
    Wang H F, Li H S, Ma H L, et al. Clarification effects of pectinase on strawberry fruit juice. Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Ensgineerting, 2003, 19(3): 161-164. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2003.03.038
    [33]
    Wei Q P, Cheng S H, Tang F, et al. Relationship between fruit quality of Fuji apple and meteorological factors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(3): 289-292. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.1999.03.009
    [34]
    Nie J Y, Li Z X, Li H F, et al. Evaluation Indices for apple physicochemical quality. Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 45(14): 2895-2903. doi:  10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.012
    [35]
    Zhang M J, Zhao Y X. The climate suitability zoning method of the solar greenhouse in the northern of China. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2013, 24(3): 278-286. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2013.03.003
    [36]
    Wei Q P, Wang L Q, Li J R, et al. Effect of ecological factors on "jonagold" apples. Advances in Horticulture, 1998(2): 59-63 https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-EGYP199806001013.htm
    [37]
    Wang J, Zhang L, Yang Y. Research progress of apple quality evaluation index. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 58(2): 3-5. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1002-204X.2017.02.002
    [38]
    Yu Y S, Ge B J, Pu Y Y. A study on the relationship between sugar contents of apple and temperature. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 1990, 11(3): 34-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNY199003009.htm
    [39]
    Yu Y S, Pu Y Y. A study on the relationship between the quality of apple and meteorological condition. Meteorology Monthly, 1991, 17(3): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX199103004.htm
    [40]
    Lu Q N. The distribution and ecologic factors of apples in China. Agricultural Sciences, 1980(1): 46-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNYK198001005.htm
    [41]
    Zhang G L. Effect of ecological factors on the quality of fruit. Journal of Fruit Science, 1994, 11(2): 120-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSKK199402014.htm
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(4)  / Tables(8)

    Article views (958) PDF downloads(104) Cited by()
    • Received : 2021-03-17
    • Accepted : 2021-05-31
    • Published : 2021-07-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint