Dong Jiayang, Cui Ye, Ruan Zheng, et al. Retrieval and experiments of atmospheric vertical motions in convective precipitation clouds. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 167-179. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220204.
Citation: Dong Jiayang, Cui Ye, Ruan Zheng, et al. Retrieval and experiments of atmospheric vertical motions in convective precipitation clouds. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 167-179. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220204.

Retrieval and Experiments of Atmospheric Vertical Motions in Convective Precipitation Clouds

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220204
  • Received Date: 2021-10-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-12-24
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-31
  • Detecting the vertical motions of the atmosphere in convective clouds is difficult. The cost of aircraft detection is expensive, limited by maximum flight altitude, high detection risk, low frequency, etc. In recent years, remote sensing instruments are applied with the development of detection technology. Ground-based vertical pointing radar has become a reliable way to obtain atmospheric vertical motions, through which the cloud structure and dynamic characteristics of convective precipitation clouds can be obtained, and the distribution and evolution characteristics of the intensity and proportion of atmospheric vertical movement during the mature stage of convection can be monitored in detail. Based on the vertical structure detection data of precipitation clouds from ground to 15 km height by a vertical pointing radar with 5520 MHz C-band Frequency Modulation Continuous Wave (VPR-CFMCW) technology, the vertical motions in the convective precipitation cloud are retrieved, and the vertical structure of convection and evolution characteristics of vertical motions at different heights are analyzed. The VPR-CFMCW is used to carry out the atmospheric vertical motion retrieval experiments on 4 convective precipitation events at the Longmen Station in Guangdong Province during pre-monsoon from 20 April to 22 April in 2019. It is found that the updrafts of the atmosphere before convective precipitation have a positive contribution to the intensity of reflectivity and surface precipitation afterwards. The deep convection is inclined, which causes the vertical section to show a layered structure at certain moments. Convective precipitation is dominated by downdrafts of the entire level, updrafts and downdrafts of the upper-level atmosphere appear alternately, when downdrafts account for the highest proportion in the lower-level, and the updrafts account for an increased proportion above 6 km height. The intensity of atmospheric vertical motions is strong in the upper-level, as strong updrafts and downdrafts exceeding 10 m·s-1 mostly appear above 6 km height. The vertical motions vary greatly at 4-6 km height. The average downdraft speed is less than 5 m·s-1 and the average updraft speed is around 2 m·s-1 under 4 km height. The development of ground-based vertical pointing radar can improve the understanding of vertical structure evolution and dynamic characteristics of convective precipitation clouds.
  • Fig. 1  VPR-CFMCW data of four convections events from 20 Apr to 22 Apr in 2019

    (a)reflectivity, (b)radial velocity, (c)velocity spectral width

    Fig. 2  Z-Vt relationship

    (a)the fitting result of rain region, (b)the comparison of different relationships

    Fig. 3  Cumulative frequency altitude diagrams of four events convective core reflectivity

    (the red line denotes the average height of the bright band, the bold solid line denotes profile of frequency)

    Fig. 4  The convective period of event 1

    (a)reflectivity, (b)radial velocity, (c)atmospheric vertical motions Wair (the black (red) ellipse denotes strong ascent (descent)), (d)minute rainfall

    Fig. 5  The same as in Fig. 4, but for event 2

    Fig. 6  The same as in Fig. 4, but for event 3

    Fig. 7  The same as in Fig. 4, but for event 4

    Fig. 8  The atmospheric vertical motions in convective core of four events before and after filtering the low velocity value(|Wair|≤1 m·s-1)

    (the solid line denotes the average, the dashed line denotes the 5th percentile of updraft, the dotted line denotes the 95th percentile of downdraft) (a)all samples before the filtering,(b)updraft samples after the filtering, (c)downdraft samples after the filtering

    Fig. 9  Proportion of atmospheric vertical motions in convective core of four events

  • [1]
    Jr Houze R A.Cloud Dynamics.San Diego,CA,USA:Academic,1993:573.
    [2]
    Han F, Long M S, Li Y A, et al. The application of recurrent neural network to nowcasting. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2019, 30(1): 61-69. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20190106
    [3]
    He L F, Chen S, Guo Y Q. Observation characteristics and synoptic mechanisms of Typhoon Lekima extreme rainfall in 2019. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(5): 513-526. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200501
    [4]
    Heymsfield G M, Tian L, Heymsfield A J, et al. Characteristics of deep tropical and subtropical convection from nadir-viewing high-altitude airborne Doppler radar. J Atmos Sci, 2010, 67(2): 285-308. doi:  10.1175/2009JAS3132.1
    [5]
    Byers H R, Braham R R. The Thunderstorm: Report of the Thunderstorm Project. US Weather Bureau, Washington DC: 1949: 287.
    [6]
    Lemone M A, Zipser E J. Cumulonimbus vertical velocity events in GATE. Part Ⅰ: Diameter, intensity and mass flux. J Atmos Sci, 1980, 37(11): 2444-2457. doi:  10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2444:CVVEIG>2.0.CO;2
    [7]
    Anderson N F, Grainger C A, Stith J L. Characteristics of strong updrafts in precipitation systems over the central tropical Pacific Ocean and in the Amazon. J Appl Meteorol, 2005, 44(5): 731-738. doi:  10.1175/JAM2231.1
    [8]
    Zhu S C, Yuan Y, Wu Y, et al. Statistical characteristics of isolated convection in the Jianghuai Region. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2019, 30(6): 690-699. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20190605
    [9]
    Feng J Q, Liu M, Cai J. Meso-scale convective characteristics of "7·22" extreme rain in the west mountainous area of Fujian. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(6): 748-758. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180610
    [10]
    Tridon F, Battaglia A. Dual-frequency radar Doppler spectral retrieval of rain drop size distributions and entangled dynamics variables. J Geophys Res, 2015, 120(11): 5585-5601. doi:  10.1002/2014JD023023
    [11]
    Williams C R, Beauchamp R M, ChandrasekarV. Verticalair motions and raindrop size distributions estimated using mean Doppler velocity difference from 3- and 35-GHz vertically pointing radars. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2016, 54(10): 1-13. doi:  10.1109/TGRS.2016.2594250
    [12]
    Wang J, Wang W Q, Wang H, et al. Hydrometeor particle characteristics during a late summer hailstorm in northern Shandong. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(3): 370-384. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210309
    [13]
    Yang S N, Duan Y H. Extremity analysis on the precipitation and environmental field of Typhoon Rumbia in 2018. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(3): 290-302. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200304
    [14]
    Fu P L, Hu D M, Huang H, et al. Observation of a tornado event in outside-region of Typhoon Mangkhut by X-band polarimetric phased array radar in 2018. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(6): 706-718. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200606
    [15]
    Cui Y, Ruan Z, Wei M, et al. Vertical structure and dynamical properties during snow events in middle latitudes of China from observations by the C-band vertically pointing radar. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2020, 98(3): 527-550. doi:  10.2151/jmsj.2020-028
    [16]
    Ruan Y, Ruan Z, Wei M, et al. Research of the vertical structure of summer convective precipiationcloud over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau by C-FMCW radar. Plateau Meteor, 2018, 37(1): 93-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201801008.htm
    [17]
    Jin L, Ruan Z, Ge R S, et al. Bright band analysis in Yangtze-Huaihe Region of Anhui using data detection from C-FMCW radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2016, 27(3): 312-322. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20160306
    [18]
    Pang S Z, Ruan Z, Yang L, et al. Estimating raindrop size distributions and vertical air motions with spectral difference using vertically pointing radar. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2021, 38: 1697-1713.
    [19]
    Giangrande S E, Collis S, Straka J, et al. A summary of convective-core vertical velocity properties using ARM UHF wind profilers in Oklahoma. J Appl Meteorol Clim, 2013, 52(10): 2278-2295. doi:  10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0185.1
    [20]
    Wang D, Giangrande S E, Feng Z, et al. Updraft and downdraft core size and intensity as revealed by radar wind profilers: MCS observations and idealized model comparisons. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2020, 125(11): e2019JD031774.
    [21]
    Heymsfield A J, Westbrook C D. Advances in the estimation of ice particle fall speeds using laboratory and field measurements. J Atmos Sci, 2010, 67(8): 2469-2482. doi:  10.1175/2010JAS3379.1
    [22]
    Spek A L J, Unal C M H, Moisseev D N, et al. A new technique to categorize and retrieve the microphysical properties of ice particles above the melting layer using radar dual-polarization spectral analysis. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2010, 25(3): 482-497.
    [23]
    Cheng L, English M. A relationship between hailstone concentration and size. J Atmos Sci, 1983, 40(1): 204-213. doi:  10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0204:ARBHCA>2.0.CO;2
    [24]
    Hogan R J, Westbrook C D. Equation for the microwave backscatter cross section of aggregate snowflakes using the self-similar rayleigh-gans approximation. J Atmos Sci, 2014, 71(9): 3292-3301. doi:  10.1175/JAS-D-13-0347.1
    [25]
    Li F, Ruan Z, Wang H Y, et al. A calibration method of WPR echo intensity with Doppler velocity spectrum. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(3): 315-331. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210305
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(9)

    Article views (1172) PDF downloads(127) Cited by()
    • Received : 2021-10-27
    • Accepted : 2021-12-24
    • Published : 2022-03-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint