Extraction of Peanut Planting Area Based on Dual-temporal Remote Sensing Features of Crops

Guo Qile; Li Junling; Guo Peng

doi:10.11898/1001-7313.20220208

Vol.33, NO.2, 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Applied Meteorological Science > 2022 > 33(2): 218-230

Guo Qile, Li Junling, Guo Peng. Extraction of peanut planting area based on dual-temporal remote sensing features of crops. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 218-230. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220208.

Citation:

Guo Qile, Li Junling, Guo Peng. Extraction of peanut planting area based on dual-temporal remote sensing features of crops. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 218-230. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220208.

Guo Qile, Li Junling, Guo Peng. Extraction of peanut planting area based on dual-temporal remote sensing features of crops. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 218-230. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220208.

Citation:

PDF( 2451 KB)

Extraction of Peanut Planting Area Based on Dual-temporal Remote Sensing Features of Crops

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220208

Guo Qile^{1, 2},
Li Junling^{1, 2
,
,},
Guo Peng^{1, 2}

1.
CMA·Henan Key Laboratory of Agrometeorological Ensuring and Applied Technique, Zhengzhou 450003
2.
Henan Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Zhengzhou 450003

Received Date: 2021-11-25
Rev Recd Date: 2022-01-11
Publish Date: 2022-03-31

Abstract

Abstract

Various high-resolution satellite remote sensing platforms and sensors have been established recently, but there are still many challenges for crop type fine classification. New methods are needed for fine classification of crop types and extraction of peanut planting area using high-resolution optical remote sensing data. Using panchromatic and multi-spectral (PMS) data of GF-1 and GF-6 in the middle and late stages of crop growth, 40 classification features are constructed from the perspective of spectrum, texture, and temporal variation of remote sensing image by means of spatio-temporal fusion and spectral mathematical transformation.15 features are selected by ReliefF-Pearson method. To compare the effects of different feature types on classification, the selected features are combined into four feature spaces, and the separability between crops in these feature spaces is measured by Jeffries-Matusita (J-M) distance. Using maximum likelihood classification, support vector machine and random forest as classifiers, crop classification tests of four feature space schemes are carried out, and different classification results are evaluated from the perspective of remote sensing classification accuracy and landscape analysis. Compared with the original image, in four feature spaces, the J-M distance between peanut and other crops is close to the saturation value of 2.0, and their separability is significantly enhanced. For all test results, the overall accuracy of crop classification is more than 78.0%, the Kappa coefficient of crop classification is more than 0.7, and the user's accuracy and producer's accuracy of peanut are both more than 79.0%. Compared with the three classifiers, Random Forest has the highest classification accuracy, and the average values of the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient, peanut user's accuracy and producer's accuracy of its four schemes are 91.49%, 0.89, 94.45% and 93.30%, respectively. In addition, combining dual-temporal remote sensing data, texture and vegetation index features, as well as their temporal changes, can effectively improve the classification accuracy. It shows that adding the texture feature can improve the accuracy better than the vegetation index features. The landscape shape analysis of the classification results also shows that the overall crop classification and peanut, their patch shapes are close to the reality, and random forest is the best classifier. Its mean shape indices of crop landscape-level and peanut class-level are only 1.333 and 1.270, and the corresponding mean patch fractal dimension indices are only 1.127 and 1.110. An optimal dual temporal remote sensing crop classification model is proposed. Using this model, summer peanut planting area extraction and area measurement are carried out in four main peanut producing counties in Huang-Huai-Hai Region. Compared with the statistical data, the determination coefficient is 0.98 and the relative error of area calculation is ±16.25%, showing a good application prospect.
- peanut;
- temporal features of crops;
- features selection;
- remote sensing classification

FullText(HTML)

References(37)

Figures and Tables

图 1 典型试验区和样本分布

(方形代表训练样本, 圆形代表测试样本)

Fig. 1 Typical study area and experimental measurements

(the square denotes training sample, the circle denotes test sample)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 2 Weight and ranking of features

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 3 Pearson correlation coefficient between features

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 4 Classification accuracy of different schemes

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 5 Landscape metrics of different schemes

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 6 Recognition results of peanut planting area by C-DRSC and spatial distribution of regional proportion of statistical area

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 7 Experimental effect analysis of peanut planting area measured by remote sensing

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Table 1 Experimental measurements for each crop type

作物	训练样本		测试样本
作物	地块	像素	地块	像素
玉米	49	59539	45	55786
花生	79	212440	86	241625
水稻	45	100386	43	94936
大豆	30	27994	29	26862

DownLoad: Download CSV

Table 2 Information of selected features

编码	特征参量	类型
S1~S4	2020-08-01时相的红、绿、蓝和近红外波段	光谱特征
S5~S8	2020-08-15时相的红、绿、蓝和近红外波段	光谱特征
V1	2020-08-01时相的归一化植被指数	植被指数特征
V2	2020-08-01时相的绿度总和指数
V3	2020-08-01时相的比值植被指数
V4	2020-08-01和2020-08-15两时相归一化植被指数差
T1	2020-08-01时相纹理平均值	纹理特征
T2	2020-08-15时相纹理平均值
T3	2020-08-15和2020-08-01两时相纹理平均值差

DownLoad: Download CSV

Table 3 The J-M distances between peanut and the following crop in different feature spaces

作物	原始影像		构造的特征空间
作物	2020-08-01	2020-08-15	A	B	C	D
大豆	1.9199	1.4455	1.9527	1.9564	1.9967	1.9970
水稻	1.9669	1.4921	1.9998	1.9999	2.0000	2.0000
玉米	1.7635	1.9935	1.8510	1.8616	1.9916	1.9922

DownLoad: Download CSV

References

[1]	Tang H J, Zhou Q B, Liu J, et al. Wheat Mapping Using High Resolution Remote Sensing Data. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
[2]	Luo J N, Liu L W. Research and implementation of remote sensing big data distributed technology. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2017, 28(5): 621-631. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20170510
[3]	Ye Q L, Xu D P, Zhang D. Remote sensing image classification based on deep learning features and support vector machine. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2019, 4(2): 125-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKKF201902020.htm
[4]	Kuang Q M, Yu T Z. Review of leveraging AI for exploitation of satellite observations. Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology, 2020, 10(3): 21-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1973.2020.03.004
[5]	Sun J, Cao Z, Li H, et al. Application of artificial intelligence technology to numerical weather prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(1): 1-11. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210101
[6]	Zhang P, Hu S G. Fine crop classification by remote sensing in complex planting area based on field parcel. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(20): 125-134. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.20.016
[7]	Jin Z Q, Wang X M, Bao Y S, et al. Squall line identification method based on convolution neural network. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(5): 580-591. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210506
[8]	Li Y, Chen H L. Review of machine learning approaches for modern agrometeorology. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(3): 257-266. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200301
[9]	Deng J Z, Liu Q D, Wang C W, et al. Crop classification based on multitemporal Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 47(4): 129-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDNY202004019.htm
[10]	Liu J, Wang L M, Teng F, et al. Impact of red-edge waveband of RapidEye satellite on estimation accuracy of crop planting area. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(13): 140-148. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.13.020
[11]	Wei P F, Xu X G, Yang G J, et al. Remote sensing classification of crops based on the change characteristics of multi-phase vegetation index. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 54-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NKDB201902008.htm
[12]	Zhang Y, Yang W, Sun Y, et al. Fusion of multispectral aerial imagery and vegetation indices for machine learning-based ground classification. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(8): 1411. doi: 10.3390/rs13081411
[13]	Liu E H, Zhou G S, Zhou L, et al. Remote sensing inversion of leaf and canopy water content in different growth stages of summer maize. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(1): 52-62. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200105
[14]	Yang L, Han L J, Song J L, et al. Monitoring and evaluation of high temperature and heat damage of summer maize based on remote sensing data. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(6): 749-758. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200610
[15]	Zhang Y G, Tao Y X, Luo X B, et al. Hyperspectral image classification based on feature importance. Infrared Technology, 2020, 42(12): 1185-1191. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HWJS202012010.htm
[16]	Yang S T, Gu L J, Li X F, et al. Crop classification method based on optimal feature selection and hybrid CNN-RF networks for multi-temporal remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(19): 3119. doi: 10.3390/rs12193119
[17]	Orynbaikyzy A, Gessner U, Mack B, et al. Crop type classification using fusion of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data: Assessing the impact of feature selection, optical data availability, and parcel sizes on the accuracies. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17): 2779. doi: 10.3390/rs12172779
[18]	Deng L Y, Shen Z F, Ke Y M, et al. Winter wheat planting area extraction using multi-temporal remote sensing images based on field parcel. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(21): 157-164. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.21.019
[19]	Ma Q R, Zuo X, Hu C D, et al. Effects of waterlogging on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer peanut. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(4): 479-490. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210409
[20]	Zhou S D, Jing L Y, Meng H K, et al. Analysis on spatial distribution evolution of main peanut production areas in China and its influencing factors. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018(3): 100-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201803009.htm
[21]	Wei S C, Li K W, Zhang J Q, et al. Hazard assessment of peanut drought and flood disasters in Huang-Huai-Hai Region. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(5): 629-640. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210510
[22]	Cheng Z S, Li Y R, Xu G Z, et al. Present situation of peanut production, scientific research and industrialization development countermeasures in Hebei Province. Journal of Peanut Science, 2003, 32(Suppl I): 60-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PEAN2003S1011.htm
[23]	Zhou S, Han B, Li S, et al. Current situation and development countermeasure of peanut in Henan Province. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 27(8): 56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2021.08.011
[24]	Zhu B C, Li Z G, Wang Y T, et al. Consideration on development of peanut industry in Henan-Investigation on the development of peanut industry in Zhengyang County, Zhumadian City. China Grain Economy, 2019(10): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4821.2019.10.015
[25]	Liu N, Xiong A Y, Zhang Q, et al. Development of basic dataset of severe convective weather for artificial intelligence training. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(5): 530-541. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210502
[26]	Wang N, Li Q Z, Du X, et al. Identification of main crops based on the univariate feature selection in Subei. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 21(4): 519-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YGXB201704004.htm
[27]	Chen Y W, Huang X M, Li Y, et al. Ensemble learning for bias correction of station temperature forecast based on ECMWF products. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(4): 494-503. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20200411
[28]	Han F, Yang L, Zhou C X, et al. An experimental study of the short-time heavy rainfall event forecast based on ensemble learning and sounding data. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(2): 188-199. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20210205
[29]	Kononenko I. Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF//European Conference on Machine Learning, 1994: 171-182.
[30]	Liu Y, Meng Q Y, Wang Y J, et al. A method for estimating impervious surface percentage based on feature optimization and SVM. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2018, 34(1): 24-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2018.01.005
[31]	Tong Q X, Zhang B, Zheng L F. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
[32]	Geng X R. Target Detection and Classification for Hyperspectral Imagery. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Institute of Remote Sensing Applications), 2005.
[33]	Deng N Y, Tian Y J. A New Method in Data Mining: Support Vector Machine. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[34]	Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[35]	Congalton R G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991, 37(1): 35-46. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
[36]	Zhang Y S, Ouyang F, Yuan Z M. Change characteristics of landscape pattern in farmland ecosystems in North China. Ecological Science, 2018, 37(4): 114-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STKX201804014.htm
[37]	Luo Z J, Zhao Y, Zhao J, et al. Defining of permanent basic farmland based on landscape pattern and spatial autocorrelation. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(10): 195-204. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.10.022