Vol.33, NO.5, 2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Applied Meteorological Science  > 2022  >  33(5): 581-593
Yin Xiaoyan, Hu Zhiqun, Zheng Jiafeng, et al. Filling in the dual polarization radar echo occlusion based on deep learning. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(5): 581-593. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220506.
Citation: Yin Xiaoyan, Hu Zhiqun, Zheng Jiafeng, et al. Filling in the dual polarization radar echo occlusion based on deep learning. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(5): 581-593. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220506.
shu

Filling in the Dual Polarization Radar Echo Occlusion Based on Deep Learning

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20220506
  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081

  • 2.

    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory of Atmosphere Sounding, China Meteorological Administration, Chengdu 610225

  • Received Date: 2022-03-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-06-15
  • Publish Date: 2022-09-15
    Abstract
  • Radar beam blockage is an important error source that affects the quality of weather radar data. The S-band dual-polarization radar in Guangzhou has multi-azimuth occlusion at low elevation and is partially occluded at high elevation. Based on deep learning methods such as convolutional neural network, two echo filling networks, i.e., VEF(vertical echo-filling) and HEF(horizontal echo-filling) are constructed. Based on this architecture, echoes from the unblocked area are used to construct training datasets and fill the reflectivity ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR in the occlusion area. For the area with only 0.5° elevation occlusion, multi-modal modeling is carried out based on VEF architecture by using 3D data from multiple upper elevations, radial directions and gates. Considering that the radar beam broadens with distance and to avoid the influence of the melting layer, the radar beam is divided into four sections according to the oblique distance of 0.5° elevation, and the vertical echo-filling model is trained respectively. For the area with high occlusion elevation, multi-mode modeling is carried out based on HEF architecture using the data of multiple adjacent radial directions and gates with the same elevation. According to the number of occlusion radial, two types of horizontal echo-filling models, three radials echo-filling model and five radials echo-filling model are constructed respectively. Finally, the models are evaluated by three cases and three indicators:Explained variance, mean absolute error and correlation coefficient. The maximum explained variance of ZH vertical echo-filling model is 0.91, the minimum mean absolute error is 1.72 dB, and the maximum correlation coefficient is 0.96. The maximum explained variance of ZDR vertical echo-filling model is 0.87, the minimum mean absolute error is 0.12 dB, and the maximum correlation coefficient is 0.92. The maximum explained variance of ZH horizontal fill model is 0.92, the minimum mean absolute error is 1.69 dB, and the maximum correlation coefficient is 0.96. The maximum explained variance of ZDR horizontal echo-filling model is 0.92, the minimum mean absolute error is 0.12 dB, and the maximum correlation coefficient is 0.96. The deep learning echo-filling model can be used to correct the echoes of Guangzhou S-band dual-polarization radar occlusion area effectively, and the quality of weather radar data is improved.
    • FullText(HTML)
    References(33)

  • Fig. 1  Occlusion coefficient of 0.5° elevation(a) and 1.5° elevation(b) of Guangzhou CINRAD/SAD calculated from geographic elevation data

    (the distance between adjacent rings is 30 km)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 2  VEF(a) and HEF(b) network architecture

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 3  Plots of predicted and observed echo reflectivity of each section with ZH and ZDR vertical echo-filling models

    (color mark denotes Gaussian kernel density estimation)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 4  Plots of predicted and observed echo reflectivity of different fill radial numbers with ZH and ZDR horizontal echo-filling models

    (color mark denotes Gaussian kernel density estimation)

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 5  PPI images of echo-filling result comparison of 0.5° elevation at 1136 UTC 25 Aug 2019

    (red ellipse denotes the obvious blocked area, the same as in after)
    (a)observed ZH, (b)predicted ZH, (c)observed ZDR, (d)predicted ZDR

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 6  PPI images of echo-filling result comparison of 0.5° elevation at 0854 UTC 6 Jun 2020

    (a)observed ZH, (b)predicted ZH, (c)observed ZDR, (d)predicted ZDR

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Fig. 7  PPI images of echo-filling result comparison of 0.5° elevation at 0354 UTC 8 May 2019

    (a)observed ZH, (b)predicted ZH, (c)observed ZDR, (d)predicted ZDR

    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Table  1  Evaluation of each section in ZH and ZDR vertical echo-filling models

    填补量 距离段/km 解释方差 平均绝对偏差/dB 相关系数
    ZH [20, 54) 0.9116 1.7947 0.9572
    [54, 68) 0.9155 1.7251 0.9634
    [68, 88) 0.8956 1.7210 0.9526
    [88, 120] 0.8206 2.2630 0.9208
    ZDR [20, 54) 0.8762 0.1520 0.9240
    [54, 68) 0.8564 0.1204 0.8971
    [68, 88) 0.8538 0.1228 0.9083
    [88, 120] 0.8308 0.1440 0.8683
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  Evaluation of different fill radial numbers in ZH and ZDR horizontal echo-filling models

    填补量 遮挡径向数 解释方差 平均绝对偏差/dB 相关系数
    ZH 3 0.9228 1.6973 0.9615
    5 0.8342 2.1143 0.9227
    ZDR 3 0.9254 0.1189 0.9639
    5 0.8542 0.1275 0.9333
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  3  Evaluation of echo-filling of each section in the unblocked area at 1136 UTC 25 Aug 2019

    填补量 距离段/km 解释方差 平均绝对偏差/dB 相关系数
    ZH [20, 54) 0.9031 1.0245 0.9567
    [54, 68) 0.9094 1.0267 0.9632
    [68, 88) 0.8250 2.0311 0.9102
    [88, 120] 0.7851 2.1401 0.8816
    ZDR [20, 54) 0.9015 0.0315 0.9211
    [54, 68) 0.9242 0.0309 0.9012
    [68, 88) 0.8240 0.0353 0.8743
    [88, 120] 0.7789 0.0328 0.8674
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  4  Evaluation of echo-filling of each section in the unblocked area at 0854 UTC 6 Jun 2020

    填补量 距离段/km 解释方差 平均绝对偏差/dB 相关系数
    ZH [20, 54) 0.9311 1.4654 0.9457
    [54, 68) 0.9594 2.0431 0.9341
    [68, 88) 0.8950 2.1143 0.9019
    [88, 120] 0.8854 2.3496 0.8942
    ZDR [20, 54) 0.9592 0.0312 0.9732
    [54, 68) 0.9321 0.0207 0.9643
    [68, 88) 0.9034 0.0236 0.9325
    [88, 120] 0.8811 0.0413 0.9078
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  5  Evaluation of echo-filling of each section in the unblocked area at 0354 UTC 8 May 2019

    填补量 距离段/km 解释方差 平均绝对偏差/dB 相关系数
    ZH [20, 54) 0.9330 1.0309 0.9681
    [54, 68) 0.9121 1.0331 0.9616
    [68, 88) 0.9345 2.0154 0.9473
    [88, 120] 0.8708 2.3480 0.9126
    ZDR [20, 54) 0.9865 0.0333 0.9618
    [54, 68) 0.9618 0.0243 0.9679
    [68, 88) 0.9097 0.0251 0.9402
    [88, 120] 0.8602 0.0381 0.9231
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    Huang X Y, Ma L, Yang M, et al. Recognition and correction of beam blockage of weather radar based on spatial correlation. J Meteor Sci, 2019, 39(4): 532-539. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKX201904011.htm
    [2]
    Xu S Y, Wu C, Liu L P. Parameter improvements of hydrometeor classification algorithm for the dual-polarimetric radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(3): 350-360. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200309
    [3]
    Shakti P C, Maki M, Shimizu S, et al. Correction of reflectivity in the presence of partial beam blockage over a mountainous region using X-band dual polarization radar. J Hydrometeor, 2013, 14(3): 744-764. doi:  10.1175/JHM-D-12-077.1
    [4]
    Germann U, Galli G, Boscacci M, et al. Radar precipitation measurement in a mountainous region. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 2006, 132(618): 1669-1692. doi:  10.1256/qj.05.190
    [5]
    Wu C H, Wan Y F, Wu T, et al. Vertical profile of radar echo and its determination methods. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2006, 17(2): 232-239. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.02.014
    [6]
    Tabary P. The new French operational radar rainfall product. Part Ⅰ: Methodology. Wea Forecasting, 2007, 22(3): 393-408. doi:  10.1175/WAF1004.1
    [7]
    Battan L J. Radar Observation of the Atmosphere. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.
    [8]
    Luo L, Jing G F, Guo J, et al. Study on weather radar echo block correction technology of Beijing Meteorological Bureau. Sci Technol Eng, 2016, 16(12): 12-19. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.12.003
    [9]
    Lee J, Jung S H, Kim H L, et al. Improved rainfall estimation based on corrected radar reflectivity in partial beam blockage area of S-band dual-polarization radar. Korean Meteor Soc, 2017, 27(4): 467-481.
    [10]
    Yang H P, Zhang P Y, Cheng M H, et al. The valid mosaic data region of the CINRAD network. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(1): 47-55. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2009.01.006
    [11]
    Andrieu H, Creutin J D, Delrieu G, et al. Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part Ⅰ: Radar measurement interpretation. J Hydrol, 1997, 193: 1-25. doi:  10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03202-7
    [12]
    Creutin J D, Andrieu H, Faure D. Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part Ⅱ: Radar measurement validation. J Hydrol, 1997, 193: 26-44. doi:  10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03203-9
    [13]
    Yang L, Liu L P, Wang H Y. Filling-up of occultation regions using vertical profile of reflectivity factor. Meteor Sci Technol, 2015, 43(5): 788-793. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2015.05.003
    [14]
    Ryzhkov A V, Giangrande S E, Melnikov V M, et al. Calibration issues of dual-polarization radar measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2005, 22(8): 1138-1155. doi:  10.1175/JTECH1772.1
    [15]
    Lang T J, Nesbitt S W, Carey L D. On the correction of partial beam blockage in polarimetric radar data. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2009, 26(5): 943-957. doi:  10.1175/2008JTECHA1133.1
    [16]
    Zhang P, Zrnic D, Ryzhkov A. Partial beam blockage correction using polarimetric radar measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2013, 30(5): 861-872. doi:  10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00075.1
    [17]
    Cai J Q, Tan G R, Niu R Y. Circulation pattern classification of persistent heavy rainfall in Jianghuai Region based on the transfer learning CNN model. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(2): 233-244. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210208
    [18]
    Sun J, Cao Z, Li H, et al. Application of artificial intelligence technology to numerical weather prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(1): 1-11. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210101
    [19]
    Zhao L N, Lu S, Qi D, et al. Daily maximum air temperature forecast based on fully connected neural network. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(3): 257-269. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220301
    [20]
    Jin Z Q, Wang X M, Bao Y S, et al. Squall line identification method based on convolution neural network. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(5): 580-591. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210506
    [21]
    Chen H, Chandrasekar V, Tan H, et al. Rainfall estimation from ground radar and TRMM precipitation radar using hybrid deep neural networks. Geophys Res Lett, 2019, 46(17/18): 10669-10678.
    [22]
    Guo H Y, Chen M X, Han L, et al. High-resolution nowcasting experiment of strong convection based on deep learning. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2019, 77(4): 715-727. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201904009.htm
    [23]
    Singh S, Sarkar S, Mitra P. A Deep Learning Based Approach with Adversarial Regularization for Doppler Weather Radar ECHO Prediction. 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium(IGARSS), 2017: 5205-5208.
    [24]
    Han F, Long M S, Li Y A, et al. The application of recurrent neural network to nowcasting. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2019, 30(1): 61-69. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20190106
    [25]
    Yin X Y, Hu Z Q, Zheng J F, et al. Study on radar echo-filling in an occlusion area by a deep learning algorithm. Remote Sens, 2021, 13(9): 1779. doi:  10.3390/rs13091779
    [26]
    Mi Q C, Gao X N, Li Y, et al. Application of deep learning method to drought prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(1): 104-114. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220109
    [27]
    Liu L P, Wu L L, Yang Y M. Development of fuzzy-logical two-step ground clutter detection algorithm. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2007, 65(2): 252-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200702010.htm
    [28]
    Li F, Liu L P, Wang H Y, et al. Identification of non-precipitation meteorological echoes with Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2012, 23(2): 147-158. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/20120203
    [29]
    Wen H, Liu L P, Zhang Y. Improvements of ground clutter identification algorithm for Doppler weather radar. Plateau Meteor, 2017, 36(3): 736-749. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX201703014.htm
    [30]
    Chao X J. Prediction and Application of Fuzzy Time Series in Drilling Risk Probability. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
    [31]
    Wang H Y. Assessment of Coverage Ability and Research of Methods for Regional Mosaic QPE of CINRAD. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 2015.
    [32]
    LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker J S, et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Computation, 1989, 11(4): 541-551.
    [33]
    Huang L M, Wang W, Lin Q B, et al. Fault diagnosis method of converter based on kernel density estimation classifier. Power System Technol, 2019, 43(6): 2204-2210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DWJS201906044.htm
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(7)  / Tables(5)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1315) PDF downloads(183) Cited by()
    • Received : 2022-03-06
    • Accepted : 2022-06-15
    • Published : 2022-09-15
    Journal Online
    Contact

    © 2020 Journal of Applied Meteorological Science   京ICP备15006967号-1

    Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return