Wang Junfang, Zhou Guangsheng, Song Yanling, et al. Effects of meteorological conditions on the yield of Lianyu No.1 maize. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(3): 373-378. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230310.
Citation: Wang Junfang, Zhou Guangsheng, Song Yanling, et al. Effects of meteorological conditions on the yield of Lianyu No.1 maize. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(3): 373-378. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230310.

Effects of Meteorological Conditions on the Yield of Lianyu No.1 Maize

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20230310
  • Received Date: 2023-02-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2023-05-31
  • Understanding the influence of meteorological conditions on maize yield is an important basis for ensuring stable and high yield. The effects of meteorological conditions on the yield of Lianyu No.1 maize in North China are analyzed, based on the four-year field experimental data of different sowing dates (8 June(S1), 18 June(S2), 28 June(S3) and 8 July(S4)) conducted at Hebei Gucheng Agricultural Meteorological National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station from 2018 to 2021. The results show that the delay of sowing dates leads to the extension of growing period and changes in the meteorological conditions during the growing period. When the sowing date is delayed by 20 days, the average growth period is 2.5 days longer compared with sowed 10 days earlier, and the average air temperature from emergence to jointing stages increases by 0.7℃, while the average air temperature from milk-ripening to maturity stage decreases by 5.9℃. The average yield of Lianyu No.1 maize decreases with the delay of sowing dates, and the highest yield would be achieved when the sowing date is during 8-18 June. The key meteorological factors affecting maize yield per unit area are the daily temperature range from seedling emergence to jointing stage and the average temperature from tasseling to milk-ripening stage. The results provide a reference for scientific sowing date of Lianyu No.1 maize to ensure stable and high yield.
  • Fig. 1  Growth period of maize under different sowing dates during 2018-2021

    Table  1  Average components of maize yield under different sowing dates during 2018-2021

    处理 果穗粗/cm 果穗长/cm 单株籽粒数 百粒重/g
    S1 5.1 20.0 622.5 34.467
    S2 5.1 19.0 611.2 31.246
    S3 5.1 18.9 623.5 29.940
    S4 5.0 17.3 566.6 27.286
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  2  Partial correlation coefficients of maize yield's components with meteorological factors at different growth stages during 2018-2021

    发育阶段 产量构成要素 平均气温/℃ 气温日较差/℃ 有效积温/(℃·d) 日照时数/h
    播种-出苗期 果穗粗 -0.059 0.349* 0.352* -0.368*
    果穗长 0.368* 0.022 -0.270 0.133
    单株籽粒数 0.059 0.230 -0.069 0.009
    百粒重 -0.211 0.310 -0.280 -0.065
    出苗-拔节期 果穗粗 -0.288 -0.353* 0.077 0.309
    果穗长 0.466** 0.361* 0.313* -0.214
    单株籽粒数 -0.542** 0.538** 0.441** -0.449**
    百粒重 -0.585** 0.627** 0.462** -0.116
    拔节-抽雄期 果穗粗 -0.179 -0.132 0.473** -0.381*
    果穗长 0.802** 0.234 0.227 -0.258
    单株籽粒数 0.130 0.702** 0.290 -0.651**
    百粒重 0.287 0.705** 0.682** -0.739**
    抽雄-乳熟期 果穗粗 0.001 -0.012 0.287 0.007
    果穗长 0.697** 0.177 0.435** -0.068
    单株籽粒数 0.681** 0.434** 0.523** -0.561**
    百粒重 0.811** 0.688** 0.828** -0.690**
    乳熟-成熟期 果穗粗 -0.056 -0.099 0.362* 0.140
    果穗长 0.521** 0.794** 0.434** -0.625**
    单株籽粒数 0.750** 0.012 0.509** 0.073
    百粒重 0.666** 0.530** 0.243 -0.258
    播种-成熟期 果穗粗 0.198 -0.352* 0.398* 0.288
    果穗长 0.810** 0.115 0.613** 0.047
    单株籽粒数 0.578** 0.643** 0.730** -0.653**
    百粒重 0.747** 0.633** 0.886** -0.514**
    注:*表示达到0.05显著性水平,**表示达到0.01显著性水平。
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  3  Maize yield per unit area under different sowing dates during 2018-2021(unit: t·hm-2)

    处理 2018年 2019年 2020年 2021年
    S1 13.556 13.632 14.827
    S2 14.972 11.347 11.817
    S3 9.819 12.415 11.571 11.066
    S4 8.465 10.377 9.482 8.667
    DownLoad: Download CSV

    Table  4  Partial correlations of maize yield per unit area with meteorological factors at different growth stages during 2018-2021

    发育阶段 平均气温/℃ 气温日较差/℃ 有效积温/(℃·d) 日照时数/h
    播种-出苗期 -0.112 0.343* -0.212 -0.081
    出苗-拔节期 -0.648** 0.637** 0.520** -0.316*
    拔节-抽雄期 0.278 0.776** 0.638** -0.783**
    抽雄-乳熟期 0.807** 0.618** 0.761** -0.662**
    乳熟-成熟期 0.724** 0.384* 0.363* -0.145
    播种-成熟期 0.737** 0.738** 0.898** -0.691**
    注:*表示达到0.05显著性水平,**表示达到0.01显著性水平。
    DownLoad: Download CSV
  • [1]
    Liu W, Song Y B. A daily meteorological impact index of maize yield based on weather elements. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(3): 364-374. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220310
    [2]
    Fang Q, Zhang X, Chen S, et al. Selecting traits to reduce seasonal yield variation of summer maize in the North China Plain. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(1): 343-353. doi:  10.2134/agronj2018.05.0301
    [3]
    Chen Y Y, Wang P J, Zhang Y D, et al. Comparison of drought recognition of spring maize in Northeast China based on 3 remote sensing indices. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(4): 466-476. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220407
    [4]
    Cai F, Mi N, Ming H Q, et al. Effects of improving evapotranspiration parameterization scheme on WOFOST model performance in simulating maize drought stress process. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(1): 52-64. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210105
    [5]
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistic Press, 2020.
    [6]
    Huang S B, Lv L H, Zhu J C, et al. Extending growing period is limited to offsetting negative effects of climate changes on maize yield in the North China Plain. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215: 66-73. doi:  10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.015
    [7]
    Huo Z G, Zhang H Y, Li C H, et al. Review on high temperature heat damage of maize in China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(1): 1-14. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230101
    [8]
    Ma Q R, Zuo X, Hu C D, et al. Effects of waterlogging on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer peanut. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2021, 32(4): 479-490. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20210409
    [9]
    Song Y L, Zhou G S, Guo J P, et al. Freezing injury of winter wheat in northern China and delaying sowing date to adapt. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(4): 454-465. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220406
    [10]
    Chen J Q, Shi X H. Possible effects of the difference in atmospheric heating between the Tibetan Plateau and the Bay of Bengal on spatiotemporal evolution of rainstorms. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(2): 244-256. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220210
    [11]
    Xu F, Wang B, He C, et al. Optimizing sowing date and planting density can mitigate the impacts of future climate on maize yield: A case study in the Guanzhong Plain of China. Agronomy, 2021, 11(8): 1452-1470.
    [12]
    Srivastava R, Panda R, Chakraborty A, et al. Enhancing grain yield, biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of maize by varying sowing dates and nitrogen rate under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221: 339-349.
    [13]
    Maresma A, Ballesta A, Santiveri F, et al. Sowing date affects maize development and yield in irrigated Mediterranean environments. Agriculture, 2019, 9(3): 67-81.
    [14]
    Lv Z F, Li F F, Lu G Q. Adjusting sowing date and cultivar shift improve maize adaption to climate change in China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25(1): 87-106.
    [15]
    Gao Z, Feng H Y, Liang X G, et al. Adjusting the sowing date of spring maize did not mitigate against heat stress in the North China Plain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, 298/299: 108274.
    [16]
    Bonea D. Phenology, yield and protein content of maize(Zea mays L.) hybrids as affected by different sowing dates. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 2020, 20(3): 145-150.
    [17]
    Zhu G, Liu Z, Qiao S, et al. How could observed sowing dates contribute to maize potential yield under climate change in Northeast China based on APSIM model. European Journal of Agronomy, 2022, 136: 126511.
    [18]
    Zhai L, Zhang L, Yao H, et al. The optimal cultivar×sowing date×plant density for grain yield and resource use efficiency of summer maize in the northern Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Agriculture, 2021, 12(1): 7.
    [19]
    Zhou B, Yue Y, Sun X, et al. Maize kernel weight responses to sowing date-associated variation in weather conditions. The Crop Journal, 2017, 5(1): 43-51.
    [20]
    Alam M J, Ahmed K S, Nahar M K, et al. Effect of different sowing dates on the performance of maize. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 2020, 8(2): 75-81.
    [21]
    Cao Q, Li G, Yang F, et al. Maize yield, biomass and grain quality traits responses to delayed sowing date and genotypes in rain-fed condition. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 31(6): 415-425.
    [22]
    Feng X Y, Zhou G S. Modification of leaf water content for the photosynthetic and biochemical mechanism model of C4 plant. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(3): 375-384. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220311
    [23]
    Bonelli L E, Monzon J P, Cerrudo A, et al. Maize grain yield components and source-sink relationship as affected by the delay in sowing date. Field Crops Research, 2016, 198: 215-225.
    [24]
    Wang J X, Guo J P, Li R. Accumulated temperature stability of spring maize and its application to growth period forecast. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2019, 30(5): 577-585. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20190506
    [25]
    Wang Y, Wang C, Zhang Q. Synergistic effects of climatic factors and drought on maize yield in the east of Northwest China against the background of climate change. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2021, 143(3): 1017-1033.
    [26]
    Tian B, Zhu J, Nie Y, et al. Mitigating heat and chilling stress by adjusting the sowing date of maize in the North China Plain. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2019, 205(1): 77-87.
    [27]
    Guo C M, Ren J Q, Cao T H, et al. Effects of low temperature during ear differentiation stage on yield components of spring maize. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(4): 505-512. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180411
    [28]
    Chen C, Pang Y. Response of maize yield to climate change in Sichuan Province, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22: e00893.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article views (802) PDF downloads(99) Cited by()
    • Received : 2023-02-08
    • Accepted : 2023-03-30
    • Published : 2023-05-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint