Zhang Ting, Jiao Zhimin, Mao Jiajia, et al. Relative humidity correction method of microwave radiometer combined with cloud radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2024, 35(5): 551-563. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20240504.
Citation: Zhang Ting, Jiao Zhimin, Mao Jiajia, et al. Relative humidity correction method of microwave radiometer combined with cloud radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2024, 35(5): 551-563. DOI:  10.11898/1001-7313.20240504.

Relative Humidity Correction Method of Microwave Radiometer Combined with Cloud Radar

DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20240504
  • Received Date: 2024-03-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-05-27
  • Publish Date: 2024-09-30
  • The microwave radiometer can detect and retrieve temperature and humidity profiles with high spatial and temporal resolution throughout the day. However, microwave radiometers have few detection frequencies in the middle and upper layers, making them easily affected by clouds. After integrating cloud information into brightness temperature data, the improvement in detection accuracy in the middle and upper layers still remains insufficient, failing to meet accuracy standards required for relative humidity. With the construction of a national ground-based remote sensing vertical profile system, the continuous observation of cloud radar and microwave radiometer at the same site has been achieved, enhancing the spatial and temporal resolution. Combined with the relationship between humidity and cloud formation, a comprehensive quality control method is proposed for relative humidity using cloud radar and microwave radiometer. It plays a crucial role in enhancing the accuracy of humidity profile of microwave radiometer under cloudy conditions.By analyzing the characteristic relationship between the cloud radar reflectivity factor and the radiosonde relative humidity, a piecewise correction method for the microwave radiometer relative humidity of the combined cloud radar is proposed. Error correction results are analyzed using the radiosonde and ERA5 data. It shows that there is a positive linear correlation between the relative humidity and the reflectivity factor, the relative humidity in the middle of the cloud region is approximately saturated, and the relative humidity variation trend with the height of the cloud exit region and the cloud entry region is approximately symmetric about a certain height. Under the condition of stratiform clouds, the root mean square error of relative humidity by microwave radiometer decreases by 7.99% and 8.91% when comparing with radiosonde and ERA5, and the absolute value of median deviation decreases by 12.62% and 13.05%, respectively. The absolute median deviation also decreases. Further investigation indicates the method is also effective under the condition of convection cloud, but the relative humidity in the cloud region after correction is larger than that of sounding and ERA5, and the median deviation changes from negative deviation to positive deviation. Therefore, the relative humidity segment correction method of combing cloud radar can realize the continuous real-time correction of the relative humidity profile of microwave radiometer, which partly improves the observation quality of microwave radiometer under cloud conditions.
  • Fig. 1  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar in cloud

    Fig. 1  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar in cloud

    Fig. 2  Relative humidity profiles of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar at 0800 BT 7 Aug and 2000 BT 14 Oct in 2021

    Fig. 2  Relative humidity profiles of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar at 0800 BT 7 Aug and 2000 BT 14 Oct in 2021

    Fig. 3  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar in cloud-entering region

    Fig. 3  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and reflectivity factor of cloud radar in cloud-entering region

    Fig. 4  Box plots of temperature and relative humidity on ice surface of radiosonde in middle part of cloud

    Fig. 4  Box plots of temperature and relative humidity on ice surface of radiosonde in middle part of cloud

    Fig. 5  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and normalized height in cloud-exiting and cloud-entering regions

    Fig. 5  Relationship between relative humidity of radiosonde and normalized height in cloud-exiting and cloud-entering regions

    Fig. 6  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde under stratiform cloud from Jan to Aug in 2023

    Fig. 6  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde under stratiform cloud from Jan to Aug in 2023

    Fig. 7  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5 under stratiform cloud from 1 Jul to 10 Aug in 2023

    Fig. 7  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5 under stratiform cloud from 1 Jul to 10 Aug in 2023

    Fig. 8  Reflectivity(a) and relative humidity root mean square error of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5(b) under continuous cloudy sky from 0800 BT 28 Jul to 1000 BT 29 Jul in 2023

    Fig. 8  Reflectivity(a) and relative humidity root mean square error of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5(b) under continuous cloudy sky from 0800 BT 28 Jul to 1000 BT 29 Jul in 2023

    Fig. 9  Relative humidity comparison of microwave radiometer before and after correction and radiosonde(a) and ERA5(b) under stratiform cloud

    Fig. 9  Relative humidity comparison of microwave radiometer before and after correction and radiosonde(a) and ERA5(b) under stratiform cloud

    Fig. 10  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde under convective cloud

    Fig. 10  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde under convective cloud

    Fig. 11  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5 under convective cloud

    Fig. 11  Box plots for relative humidity deviation of microwave radiometer before and after correction to ERA5 under convective cloud

    Fig. 12  Relative humidity comparison of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde(a) and ERA5(b) under convective cloud

    Fig. 12  Relative humidity comparison of microwave radiometer before and after correction to radiosonde(a) and ERA5(b) under convective cloud

  • [1]
    Zou R S, He W Y, Wang P C, et al. Assessment of radiative transfer models based on observed brightness temperature from ground-based microwave radiometer. Chinese J Atmos Sci, 2021, 45(3): 605-616.
    [2]
    Zhao C L, Cai H Q, Song Y D. Measurement of water vapor and cloud liquid water content in the troposphere by ground-based microwave remote sensing. J Appl Meteor Sci, 1991, 2(2): 200-207. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/19910226
    [3]
    Duan Y, Wu Z H. Monitoring the distribution characteristics of liquid and vapor water content in the atmosphere using ground-based remote sensing. J Appl Meteor Sci, 1999, 10(1): 34-40. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.1999.01.005
    [4]
    Wang H, Zhou H F, Wang C, et al. Accuracy validation of FY-4A temperature profile based on microwave radiometer and radiosonde. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(3): 295-308. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230304
    [5]
    Mao J J, Jiao Z M, Zhang X F, et al. Influence analysis of hydrophobic layer aging of radome on microwave radiometer observation. Meteor Sci Technol, 2022, 50(6): 759-765.
    [6]
    Li J H, Zhou Y Q, Yue Z G, et al. Water vapor and cloud base heigh difference between the north and south of Qinling Mountains based on microwave radiometer measurements. Meteor Mon, 2022, 48(4): 452-458.
    [7]
    Chang Y, Chen H B, Shi H R, et al. Comparison of atmospheric temperature and humidity sounding by different sensors onboard a new composite wing UAV. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(1): 78-90. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230107
    [8]
    Zhou B X, Zhu L F, Wu H, et al. Accuracy of atmospheric profiles retrieved from microwave radiometer and its application to precipitation forecast. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2023, 34(6): 717-728. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20230607
    [9]
    Lin X M, Wei Y H, Zhang N, et al. Construction of air-sounding-profile system based on foundation-remote-sensing equipment. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(5): 568-580. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220505
    [10]
    Wang Z C, Zhang X F, Mao J J, et al. Comparison analysis on detection performance of ground-based microwave radiometers under different weather conditions. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(3): 282-295. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180303
    [11]
    Kong F C, Li J B, Wang Y. Analysis on atmospheric profiles retrieved by microwave radiometer at genting venue of Beijing Olympic Winter Games. Meteor Mon, 2021, 47(9): 1062-1072.
    [12]
    Wang Z H, Li Q, Chu Y L, et al. Environmental thermal radiation interference on atmospheric brightness temperature measurement with ground-based K-band microwave radiometer. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2014, 25(6): 711-721. http://qikan.camscma.cn/article/id/20140607
    [13]
    Che Y F, Ma S Q, Yang L, et al. Cloud influence on atmospheric humidity profile retrieval by ground-based microwave radiometer. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(2): 193-202. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150207
    [14]
    Zhao L, Ma Y F, Zhang G X, et al. The principle and error analysis of microwave radiometer MP-3000A. Desert Oasis Meteor, 2009, 3(5): 54-57. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1002-0799.2009.05.014
    [15]
    Hu S Z, Ma S Q, Tao F, et al. Ground-based dual-band cloud observing system and its comparative experiments. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2012, 23(4): 441-450. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2012.04.007
    [16]
    Chan P W. Performance and application of a multi-wavelength, ground-based microwave radiometer in intense convective weather. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2009, 18(3): 253-265. doi:  10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0375
    [17]
    Knupp K R, Ware R, Cimini D, et al. Ground-based passive microwave profiling during dynamic weather conditions. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2009, 26(6): 1057-1073. doi:  10.1175/2008JTECHA1150.1
    [18]
    Liu H Y. The temperature profile comparison between the ground-based microwave radiometer and the other instrument for the recent three years. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2011, 69(4): 719-728.
    [19]
    Mao J J, Zhang X F, Wang Z C, et al. Comparison of brightness temperature of multi-type ground-based microwave radiometers. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2018, 29(6): 724-736. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20180608
    [20]
    Frate F D, Giovanni S. A combined natural orthogonal function/neural network technique for the radiometric estimation of atmospheric profiles. Radio Science, 1998.33(2): 405-410. doi:  10.1029/97RS02219
    [21]
    Löhnert U, Crewell S, Simmer C, et al. Profiling cloud liquid water by combining active and passive microwave measurements with cloud model statistics. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2001, 18(8): 1354-1366. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1354:PCLWBC>2.0.CO;2
    [22]
    Liljegren J C, Clothiaux E E, Mace G G, et al. A new retrieval for cloud liquid water path using a ground-based microwave radiometer and measurements of cloud temperature. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2001, 106(D13): 14485-14500. doi:  10.1029/2000JD900817
    [23]
    Ding H X, Ma S Q, Yang L, et al. Retrieval of humidity profiles by using cloud radar and microwave radiometer. Meteor Mon, 2018, 44(12): 1604-1611. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.10000526.2018.12.010
    [24]
    Ma L N. Quality Control of Ground-Based Microwave Radiometer Observations and Parameters Retrieval Study Based on Cloudy Samples. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 2018.
    [25]
    Zhang X F, Wang Z C, Mao J J, et al. Experiments on improving temperature and humidity profile retrieval for ground-based microwave radiometer. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2020, 31(4): 385-396. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20200401
    [26]
    Tang Y J, Ma S Q, Yang L, et al. Observation and comparison of cloud-base heights by ground-based millimeter-wave cloud radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2015, 26(6): 680-687. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20150604
    [27]
    Liu X L, Liu D S, Guo L J, et al. The observational precision of domestic MWP967KV ground-based microwave radiometer. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2019, 30(6): 731-744. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20190609
    [28]
    Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteor Soc, 2020, 145(722): 1882-1896.
    [29]
    Li Z, Chen J, Ma Z S, et al. Deviation distribution features of CMA-GFS cloud prediction. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2022, 33(5): 527-540. doi:  10.11898/1001-7313.20220502
    [30]
    Wang W Y, Dong X B, Sun Y W, et al. Comparative analysis of microwave radiometer and radiosonde measurements in Xingtai Area. Meteor Sci Technol, 2022, 50(3): 344-354.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(24)

    Article views (196) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()
    • Received : 2024-03-21
    • Accepted : 2024-05-27
    • Published : 2024-09-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint