Shen Yuanfang, Yi Lan, Chen Yi, et al. Impact of changes in radiation parameterization on model medium-range and monthly forecasting. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2002, 13(3): 299-311.
Citation: Shen Yuanfang, Yi Lan, Chen Yi, et al. Impact of changes in radiation parameterization on model medium-range and monthly forecasting. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2002, 13(3): 299-311.

Impact of Changes in Radiation Parameterization on Model Medium-range and Monthly Forecasting

  • Received Date: 2009-09-19
  • Rev Recd Date: 2001-02-22
  • Publish Date: 2002-06-30
  • A comparison of two radiation parameterization schemes has been carried out in the T106 Medium-range NWP model and the National Climate Center’s climate model T63. The radiation scheme used for the control integration in the two models at present was the original ECMWF operational radiation scheme (OPE), and the new radiation scheme (NEW) was the version that became operational on May 2, 1989 in ECMWF. Results indicate that OPE overestimates the short-wave water absorptivity, which leads to too large short-wave atmospheric absorption and too small downward short-wave radiation at the surface; OPE also underestimates the long-wave radiative cooling and the outgoing long-wave radiation at the top of atmosphere (OLR). In NEW the radiative energy available at the surface and an overall cooling of the troposphere increase; large turbulent heat fluxes are generated; the convective activity is enhanced; and the precipitation clearly increases. The warm temperature bias in the stratosphere in OPE is corrected. The operational parallel statistical test indicates a more pronounced improvement to the medium-range forecast of 4—7 days.
  • [1]
    Morcrette J J, Fouquart Y. On systematic errors in parameterized calculation of longwave radiation transfer. Quart. J. Rey. Meteor. Soc., 1985,111:691~708. doi:  10.1002/qj.49711146903
    [2]
    Scott N A, Chedin A. A fast line-by-line method for atmospheric absorption computations:The Automatized Atmospheric Absorption Atlas. J. Appl. Meteor., 1981,20:802~812. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<0802:AFLBLM>2.0.CO;2
    [3]
    Simmons A J, Burridge D M, Jarraud M, et al. The ECMWF medium-range prediction models:Development of the numerical formulations and the impact of increased resolution. Meteor. Atmos,Phys.,1988,40:28~60.
    [4]
    Tiedtke M, Gelegn J-F, Hollingsworth A, et al. ECMWF model: Parameterization of subgrid-scale processes. ECMWF Tech.Rep. 1979,No.10.
    [5]
    Geleyn J F, Hollingsworth A. An economical analytical method for the computation of the interaction between scattering and line absorption of radiation.Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,1979,52:1~16.
    [6]
    Ritter B. The impact of an alternative treatment of infrared radiation on the performance of the ECMWF forecast model. In: G Fiocco, Ed.IRS'84: Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, 1984. 277~280.
    [7]
    Slingo A, Slingo J M. The response of a general circulation model to cloud longwave radiative forcing Ⅰ:Introduction and initial experiments. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 1988,114:1027~1062. doi:  10.1002/(ISSN)1477-870X
    [8]
    Morcrette J J. Impact of changes to the radiation transfer parameterization plus cloud optical properties in the ECMWF model. Mon.Wea.Rew., 1990,118:847~872. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<0847:IOCTTR>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    Morcrette J J. Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system. J.Geophys.Res.,1991,96(D5): 9121~9132. doi:  10.1029/89JD01597
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (3165) PDF downloads(1298) Cited by()
    • Received : 2009-09-19
    • Accepted : 2001-02-22
    • Published : 2002-06-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint