Deng Xuejiao, Hu Sheng, Yan Jinghua. A comparing analysis on subjective and objective weather forecast. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2003, 14(6): 729-738.
Citation: Deng Xuejiao, Hu Sheng, Yan Jinghua. A comparing analysis on subjective and objective weather forecast. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2003, 14(6): 729-738.

A COMPARING ANALYSIS ON SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE WEATHER FORECAST

  • Received Date: 2002-11-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2003-01-27
  • Publish Date: 2003-12-31
  • The qualities of weather forecast in Guangzhou city of five information from April to December in 2001 are tested, the time span of forecast is 24, 38, 72 hours ahead, and the tested elements are precipitation and temperature. For precipitation, the common weather of line or rain, and weather of heavy rain have been tested respectively by using the methods of operational appraisal and Ts valuation. As for temperature forecast, the variance and graded statistics have been computed. The analyses show that for the common weather forecast of fine or rain, the forecast qualities of HRMM are generally better than others, and having good stability. For 24 hours ahead, the forecast qualities of forecasters are equal to the model, but for 24~28 hours ahead, generally the model prediction is superior to other methods. All methods have poor abilities to predict the heavy rain. The Ts valuation reveals that the model has better ability to predict rain or not. For temperature forecast, generally the forecast qualities of forecaster are the best, but the HRMM has systematical error, the model forecasts are commonly lower than those of realities. For the forecasts of precipitation and temperature, the qualities of all methods are tending down with the growth of prediction time, and the errors of forecast quality of maximum temperature are always larger than that of minimum temperature.
  • [1]
    中国气象局科教司.省地气象台短期预报岗位培训教材.北京:气象出版社, 1998.
    [2]
    闫敬华.广州中尺度模式局地要素预报性能分析.应用气象学报, 2001, 12(1):21~29. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20010103&flag=1
    [3]
    闫之辉.LAFS模式降水预报统计检验方法.数值预报产品评价公报, 1992, 5:39~42.
    [4]
    皇甫雪官.国家气象中心集合数值预报检验评价.应用气象学报, 2002, 13(1):29~36. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020103&flag=1
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(2)  / Tables(9)

    Article views (3933) PDF downloads(1396) Cited by()
    • Received : 2002-11-07
    • Accepted : 2003-01-27
    • Published : 2003-12-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint