Zhang Yaping, Cheng Minghu, Xu Hui, et al. Application of radar rainfall estimates to runoff simulation in Foziling Basin. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(3): 295-305.
Citation: Zhang Yaping, Cheng Minghu, Xu Hui, et al. Application of radar rainfall estimates to runoff simulation in Foziling Basin. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(3): 295-305.

Application of Radar Rainfall Estimates to Runoff Simulation in Foziling Basin

  • Received Date: 2006-06-22
  • Rev Recd Date: 2007-01-06
  • Publish Date: 2007-06-30
  • It is well acknowledged that the accuracy of stream flow predictions from a hydrologic model is heavily dependent on the accuracy of the precipitation inputs. Particularly, high variability of rainfall exists both in time and space, and mountainous basins have in general fast response time. Therefore, hydrological models taking into account the rainfall variability should play an important role in flood alert systems in mountainous basins. In this sense, weather radar inform ation is a key element in flood forecasting. The studied closed basin, Foziling (1813 km2), has a basin-to-radar distance of 100 km from southwest of the Hefei CINRAD/SA radar (31.866°N, 117.257°E). Comparisons of raingage-based and radar-gage-based simulated discharges using TOPMODEL (TOPography based hydrological MODEL) are performed for the Foziling basin and its 6 subcatchments. Rainfall observations of the basin are available from 12 raingauges operated by Bureau of Hydrology, Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources PRC. In order to utilize true independent data sources for verification purposes, 6 gauges are withheld from the estimation scheme and used for verification instead. The radar data are selected from an S-band Doppler weather radar located at Hefei, Anhui Province throughout the period from June 20 to July 12, 2003. The TOPMODEL rainfall-runoff model used in this study is a semi-distributed watershed model that simulates the variable-source-area mechanism of storm runoff generation and incorporates the effects of topography on flow paths. For the application of the TOPMODEL, the topographic index is computed based on 1:250000 DEM (Digital Elevation Model). To some extent, whether the merged radar-gage estimates are better than the gage-only estimates or not is relative to the density and representativeness of the raingage network; even when the raingage-only and radargage mean areal rainfall estimates show nearly the same value for the Foziling basin, there is discrepancy between raingage-only and radar-gage estimates of mean areal rainfall for each subcatchment; for certain subcatchment, the greater the discrepancy between the raingage-only and radar-gage mean areal rainfall estim ates, the bigger the divergence between the corresponding simulated runoff depths from TOPMODEL. Therefore, even when a relatively dense raingauge network exists, the rain gauge data alone do not provide an initial rainfall state that is detailed enough for accurate hydrologic simulation, and radar information is essential to provide accurate flow estimates using a rainfall-runoff model. In fact, a density of about 1 raingauge per 300 km2, which is the case of the Foziling basin after the 6 verification raingauges are withheld, is insufficient to reproduce the spatial precipitation pattern of the event studied. Conclusions from the study may be specific to the target case, which is based on the characteristics of the QPE (Quantitative Precipitation Estimation) inputs and the TOPMODEL hydrologic model, or specific hydrologic characteristics of the Foziling basin. In the future, additional events, other hydrological models and some more robust radar-raingauge correction procedures will be investigated.
  • Fig. 1  Presentation of the study area (a) relief map of the Hefei radar and the location of Foziling basin, (b) beam blockage of Hefei radar at elevation of 0.5° and location of the Foziling basin, (c) a sketch map of the 6 subcatchments of the Foziling basin from 1:250000 DEM and the location of the rain gauge network (solid squares for evaluation and circles for adjustment), (d) the 3D view of the Foziling basin

    Fig. 2  The 3D views of 6 subcatchments in the Foziling basin

    (a) subcatchment 1, (b) subcatchment 2, (c) subcatchment 3, (d) subcatchment 4, (e) subcatchment 5, (f) subcatchment 6

    Fig. 3  Scatterplots of the hourly precipitation calculated from the rain gauge data (a) and the radar data (b)

    (the regression line, correlation coeffecient R between compared quangtites, the number of calculated rainfall values N, and the root mean squared error ERMS are also given in each plot)

    Fig. 4  Temporal variations of the averaged adjustment factors from June 20 to July 12, 2003 (a)6 rain gauges for adjustment, (b)2 rain gauges for adjustment

    Fig. 5  Observed and simulated discharges from 01:00 on June 20 to 00:00 on July 12, 2003 for the Foziling basin (a) from the raingauge-based mean areal rainfall of subcatchments using 6 rain gauges (the upper curve shows the correspongding mean areal rainfall for the Foziling basin), (b) from the adjusted radar-based mean areal rainfall of subcatchments using 6 rain gauges (the upper curve shows the correspongding mean areal rainfall for the Foziling basin)

    Fig. 6  The mean areal rainfall estimates and simulated discharges from 01:00 on June 20 to 00:00 on July 12, 2003 for subcatchmennt 1 of the Foziling basin

    Table  1  List of the subcatchments with their corresponding area and distance to the outlet of the Foziling basin

    Table  2  Evaluation of the hourly precipitation calculated from the rain gauge data

    Table  3  Evaluation of the accumulated hourly precipitation derived from the radar data

    Table  4  Coefficient of efficiency (E) of hydrographs simulated using rain gages and radar estimates for the Foziling basin

    Table  5  Statistics of mean areal rainfall estimates and simulated runoff depths for the Foziling basin with its 6 subcatchments from June 20 to July 12, 2003

  • [1]
    Anagnostou E N, Krajewski W F. Calibration of the WSR-88D precipitation processing subsystem. Wea Forecasting, 1999, 13:396-406. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252452408_Calibration_of_the_WSR-88D_Precipitation_Processing_Subsystem
    [2]
    Finnerty B D, Smith M B, Seo D J, et al. Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs. J Hydrol, 1997, 203:21-38. doi:  10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00083-8
    [3]
    万玉发, 杨洪平, 肖艳娇, 等.多普勒天气雷达站址视程的客观分析技术.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(4):440-447. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000465&flag=1
    [4]
    Kucera P A, Krajewski W F, Young C B. Radar beam occultation studies using GIS and DEM technology:An example study of Guam. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2004, 21:995-1006. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0995:RBOSUG>2.0.CO;2
    [5]
    Martz W, Garbrecht J. Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Computers & Geosciences, 1992, 18(6):747-761. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222786989_Numerical_Definition_of_Drainage_Networks_and_Subcatchment_Areas_from_Digital_Elevation_Models
    [6]
    Garbrecht J, Campbell J. TOPAZ:An Automated Digital Landscape Analysis Tool for Topographic Evaluation, Drainage Identification, Watershed Segmentation and Subcatchment Parameterization. TOPAZ User Manual, USDA-ARS, Oklahoma, 1997:1-138.
    [7]
    Viessman W, Lewis G L. Introduction to Hydrology (4th ed). Harper-Collins, 1996:1-760.
    [8]
    Sun X, Mein R G, Keenan T D, et al. Flood estimation using radar and raingauge data. J Hydrology, 2000, 239:4-18. doi:  10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00350-4
    [9]
    刘晓阳, 毛节泰, 李纪人, 等.雷达联合雨量计估测降水模拟水库入库流量.水利学报, 2002, (4):342-349. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB200204009.htm
    [10]
    Ren liliang, Li Chunhong, Wang Meirong. Application of radar-measured rain data in hydrological processes modeling during the intensified observation period of HUBEX. Adv Atmos Sci, 2003, 20(2):205-211. doi:  10.1007/s00376-003-0005-8
    [11]
    Liu Xiaoyang, Mao Jietai, Zhu Yuanjing, et al. Runoff simulation using radar and rain gauge data. Adv Atmos Sci, 2003, 20 (2):213-218. doi:  10.1007/s00376-003-0006-7
    [12]
    Fulton R A, Breidenbach J P, Seo D, et al. The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea Forecasting, 1998, 13:377-395. doi:  10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0377:TWRA>2.0.CO;2
    [13]
    尹忠海, 张沛源.利用卡尔曼滤波校准方法估算区域降水量.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(2):213-219. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050226&flag=1
    [14]
    史锐, 程明虎, 崔哲虎, 等.用反射率因子垂直廓线联合雨量计校准估测夏季区域强降水.应用气象学报, 2005, 16 (6):737-745. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050696&flag=1
    [15]
    吴翠红, 万玉发, 吴涛, 等.雷达回波垂直廓线及其生成方法.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(2):232-239. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060239&flag=1
    [16]
    曹俊武, 刘黎平, 陈晓辉, 等.3836C波段双线偏振多普勒雷达及其在一次降水过程中的应用研究.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(2):192-200. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060233&flag=1
    [17]
    Wilson J W, Brandes E A. Radar measurement of rainfall— a summary. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1979, 60:1048-1058. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1979)060<1048:RMORS>2.0.CO;2
    [18]
    Colle B, Westrick K, Mass C F. Evaluation of MM5 and Eta-10 precipitation forecasts over the Pacific Northwest during the cool season. Wea Forecasting, 1999, 14:137-154. doi:  10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0137:EOMAEP>2.0.CO;2
    [19]
    Beven K J, Kirkby M J. A Physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrology Sci Bull, 1979, 24: 43-69. doi:  10.1080/02626667909491834
    [20]
    Beven K J, Kirkby M J, Schoffield N, et al. Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three UK catchments. J Hydrology, 1984, 69:119-143. doi:  10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8
    [21]
    Beven K J, Lamb R, Quinn P, et al. TOPMODEL ∥VP Singh, Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Chapter 18. Water Resources Publications, 1995:627-668.
    [22]
    Saulnier G M, Beven K J, Obled C H. Including spatially variable soil depths in TOPMODEL. J Hydrology, 1998, 202: 158-172. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223514856_Including_spatially_variable_soil_depths_in_TOPMODEL
    [23]
    郭方, 刘新仁, 任立良.以地形为基础的流域水文模型———Topmodel及其拓宽应用.水科学进展, 2000, 11(3):296-301. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKXJ200003011.htm
    [24]
    熊立华, 郭生练, 胡彩虹.TOPMODEL在流域径流模拟中的应用研究.水文, 2002, 22(5):5-8. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWZZ200205001.htm
    [25]
    陈仁升, 康尔泗, 杨建平, 等.TOPMODEL模型在黑河干流出山径流模拟中的应用.中国沙漠, 2003, 23(4):428-433. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGSS200304015.htm
    [26]
    Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Ⅰ:A discussion of principles. J Hydrol, 1970, 10: 282-290. doi:  10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

    Article views (3691) PDF downloads(1236) Cited by()
    • Received : 2006-06-22
    • Accepted : 2007-01-06
    • Published : 2007-06-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint