Guan Chenggong, Chen Qiying, Wang Juan, et al. Impacts of the cloud initialization on T213 forecasting performances. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(5): 594-600.
Citation: Guan Chenggong, Chen Qiying, Wang Juan, et al. Impacts of the cloud initialization on T213 forecasting performances. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(5): 594-600.

Impacts of the Cloud Initialization on T213 Forecasting Performances

  • Received Date: 2006-06-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2007-03-26
  • Publish Date: 2007-10-31
  • Cloud variables such as cloud water, cloud ice and cloud cover are not treated in most operational data objective analyses and initialization schemes. While cloud variations are used as prognostic variables in a forecast model, they are necessary to be defined at initial time. The common method is to set cloud variations to zero at the initial time in the initial field, and some time of several hours are needed by the forecast model in doing spin up at the beginning of the run, which is sure to affect the forecasting capabilities such as precipitation and patterns and so on. The cloud free variation scheme is adopted to realize the adding of cloud variations information to the model initial fields of T213L31, the operational global model, then both a statistic analysis of a 3 month continuous running of test and operation schemes and a case study are carried out. In order to testify that the cloud free variation scheme does not foil the balance between dynamic and thermal variances at the start of model forecast, the stabilities of the model are checked and confirmed firstly by means of analyses on kinetic energy, temperature, and so on by long time integration. A synoptic case study, which happens on June 18—19, 2005, shows that with cloud information including cloud water, cloud ice and cloud cover being added to the initial model field, the spin up phenomenon disappears which always occurs at the starting period of forecasting, and often exists for 12 to 18 hours or longer, before the cloud free scheme being added in the modeling system. And the characteristics of distribution and variation of cloud related variables can be more reasonably depicted by the model than the operational one so that the improvement of the model forecasting performance is led to especially in the short time precipitation prediction. The 3 month continuous parallel experiment in winter and summer respectively are done together with corresponding operational ones. The results based on summer 3 month statistic analyses show that positive contributions to both precipitation and geopotential height pattern are made by adding cloud variations to initial field, that is obvious in the improvement of 24 hours accumulating precipitation's TS from 36 to 108 hours lead time, and the bias of precipitation increases a little at the same time. The 3 month averaged anomaly correlation coefficients and root mean square error at 500 hPa is better than operational one at 1—4 lead days. The results based on winter experiment show that the advantages of threat score over operational one within 60 hours lead time, and the bias of precipitation are identically better than operational one at each lead time, and the 3 month averaged anomaly correlation coefficients and root mean square error at 500 hPa are better than operational one. Positive impacts on operational model forecasting can be made by reasonably initializing cloud variations in the model field. This research is based on the operational global medium range weather forecast model, which confirms that the cloud free variation scheme is reliable and feasible to the operational application in the near future. In the long term, how much contribution will be made to the operation forecasting need to be further evaluated. Cloud variables such as cloud water, cloud ice and cloud cover are not treated in most operational data objective analyses and initialization schemes. While cloud variations are used as prognostic variables in a forecast model, they are necessary to be defined at initial time. The common method is to set cloud variations to zero at the initial time in the initial field, and some time of several hours are needed by the forecast model in doing spin up at the beginning of the run, which is sure to affect the forecasting capabilities such as precipitation and patterns and so on. The cloud free variation scheme is adopted to realize the adding of cloud variations information to the model initial fields of T213L31, the operational global model, then both a statistic analysis of a 3 month continuous running of test and operation schemes and a case study are arried out. In order to testify that the cloud free variation scheme does not foil the balance between dynamic and thermal variances at the start of model forecast, the stabilities of the model are checked and confirmed firstly by means of analyses on kinetic energy, temperature, and so on by long time integration. A synoptic case study, which happens on June 18—19, 2005, shows that with cloud information including cloud water, cloud ice and cloud cover being added to the initial model field, the spin up phenomenon disappears which always occurs at the starting period of forecasting, and often exists for 12 to 18 hours or longer, before the cloud free scheme being added in the modeling system. And the characteristics of distribution and variation of cloud related variables can be more reasonably depicted by the model than the operational one so that the improvement of the model forecasting performance is led to especially in the short time precipitation prediction. The 3 month continuous parallel experiment in winter and summer respectively are done together with corresponding operational ones. The results based on summer 3 month statistic analyses show that positive contributions to both precipitation and geopotential height pattern are made by adding cloud variations to initial field, that is obvious in the improvement of 24 hours accumulating precipitation's TS from 36 to 108 hours lead time, and the bias of precipitation increases a little at the same time. The 3 month averaged anomaly correlation coefficients and root mean square error at 500 hPa is better than operational one at 1—4 lead days. The results based on winter experiment show that the advantages of threat score over operational one within 60 hours lead time, and the bias of precipitation are identically better than operational one at each lead time, and the 3 month averaged anomaly correlation coefficients and root mean square error at 500 hPa are better than operational one. Positive impacts on operational model forecasting can be made by reasonably initializing cloud variations in the model field. This research is based on the operational global medium range weather forecast model, which confirms that the cloud free variation scheme is reliable and feasible to the operational application in the near future. In the long term, how much contribution will be made to the operation forecasting need to be further evaluated.
  • Fig. 1  Timestep evolution of elements of test(dashed line)and operational(solid line)schemes started at 12:00 on June 20, 2005

    Fig. 2  Timestep evolution of global and north hemisphere averaged cloud cover producing by test and operational schemes

    Fig. 3  Accumulated precipitation from 00:00 on June 18 to 00:00 on June 19, 2005(unit:mm)

    (a)observation,(b)operational scheme,(c)test scheme

    Fig. 4  Threat score of moderate and heavy rain of the test and operational schemes averaging from June to August in 2005

    Table  1  24-hour accumulated rainfall verifications of test and operational shcemes

    Table  2  The 500 hPa height anomaly correlation coefficients and root-mean-square errors forecasts for summer and winter in 2005

  • [1]
    齐艳军, 王汉杰, 程明虎.卫星资料反演湿度场改变模式初值对降水预报的影响.应用气象学报, 2003, 14(6):663-673. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20030684&flag=1
    [2]
    齐琳琳, 孙建华, 张小玲, 等.ATOVS资料在长江流域一次暴雨过程模拟中的应用.大气科学, 2005, 29(5):780-794. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200505010.htm
    [3]
    李永平, 袁招洪, 王晓峰.用多普勒雷达反射率调整模式大气的云微物理变量.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(6):658-664. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040679&flag=1
    [4]
    张林, 倪允琪.雷达径向风资料的四维变分同化试验.大气科学, 2006, 30(5):433-440. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200603006.htm
    [5]
    常越, 薛纪善, 何金海.水汽场初值调整及其对华南降水预报贡献的研究.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(1):35-46. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000107&flag=1
    [6]
    房春花, 崔春光, 李武阶, 等.使用不同的天气尺度初值作强对流暴雨预报的差别及其原因.大气科学, 2003, 27(2):281-288. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200302014.htm
    [7]
    贝耐芳, 赵思雄.初值及物理过程对"98·7"暴雨预报结果的影响.气候与环境研究, 2002, 7(4):386-396. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHYH200204001.htm
    [8]
    崔春光.强降水过程模式中尺度水汽初值的敏感性试验.气象, 2000, 26(11):3-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200011000.htm
    [9]
    陈起英, 金之雁, 伍湘君, 等.中期数值预报系统T213L31在IBM/SP高性能计算机上的建立.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(5):523-533. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040565&flag=1
    [10]
    胡江凯, 王雨, 王毅涛.国家气象中心T213L31数值预报运行监控方案及预报效果评估.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(2):249-259. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050231&flag=1
    [11]
    管成功, 王克敏, 陈晓红.2002-2005年T213数值降水预报产品分析检验.气象, 2006, 32(8):70-76. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200608011.htm
    [12]
    王雨.2004年主汛期各数值预报模式定量降水预报评估.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(3):316-324. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060357&flag=1
    [13]
    Tiedtke M.Representation of clouds in large-scale models.Mon Wea Rev, 1993, 121:3040-3061. doi:  10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<3040:ROCILS>2.0.CO;2
    [14]
    White Peter W.IFS Documentation Cycle CY21r4.2000:300-310. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/ifs-documentation-cycle-cy28r1/
    [15]
    黄卓.气象预报产品质量评分系统技术手册.北京:中国气象局预测减灾司, 2001:9-11.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(4)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (3081) PDF downloads(1320) Cited by()
    • Received : 2006-06-09
    • Accepted : 2007-03-26
    • Published : 2007-10-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint