Wang Ying, Liu Xiaoning, Ju Xiaohui. Differences between automatic and manual observation. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(6): 849-855.
Citation: Wang Ying, Liu Xiaoning, Ju Xiaohui. Differences between automatic and manual observation. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(6): 849-855.

Differences Between Automatic and Manual Observation

  • Received Date: 2006-11-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2007-04-02
  • Publish Date: 2007-12-31
  • Manual observation is being replaced by automatic observation in China gradually. Till 2006, there are altogether 1904 automatic weather stations (AWS) in the country. Great changes have taken place in the observational rules and methods of AWS comparing with manual observations. Inhomogeneity of observational time series may be caused by many reasons and the change of observational instrument is an important one. The records of AWS and manual parallel observation in a certain period of time may be used in analyzing the observational differences between AWS and manual.Based on the data of automatic and manual parallel observations in 700 stations during 2001—2005, the differences of temperature, precipitation, pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, wind direction and ground surface temperature are calculated and the characteristic differences between automatic and manual observation in different areas are analyzed. Results show that certain differences exist in all the meteorological elements between automatic and manual observation, but in most areas the differences in temperature, precipitation, pressure, relative humidity, wind velocity and direction and ground surface temperature fall in the accepted error rang of AWS. In most stations in China the difference is of ±0.1℃ in the annual mean temperature. To be exact , the difference of annual mean maximum and minimum temperature is a little larger than annual mean temperature. More significant system error appears in the automatic observation of a few stations, and when the automatic observational data of temperature are used the instrument systematic error should be corrected. The difference of all elements between automatic and manual observation has different distribution features in China, and the same element may vary greatly in different climatic situations. In dry areas or in the seasons with little precipitation, there is a great differences between auto and manual precipitation observation. The areas with difference of 0.2—0.6 hPa in pressure are mainly distributed in the western areas with high sea level elevation. In the wet areas in the south of the Yangtze River, Tibetan Plateau, northeastern area and mountain stations of the northeast, big difference appears in the auto and manual observation of relative humidity. In the north during snowing period there is a significant difference between auto and manual observation of ground surface temperature. The use of automatic stations exerts certain influence on the continuity of annual mean temperature, so it is necessary to test whether the significant difference exists in the auto and manual observation time series if manual and auto observation data are used. Homogeneity correction is needed if the significant difference appears.The difference between auto and manual observation is unavoidable. Any instrument change in history will bring the data difference, especially the change from manual observation to automatic observation with quite different observational instrument and method. The time series of automatic observation are short in China and the replacement by automatic observation just starts, so with longer observational time series and more automatic stations further analysis is needed to know the causes for the difference between automatic and manual observation as well as correcting methods .
  • Fig. 1  Frequency distribution of the difference of annual mean, annual mean maximum and annual mean minimum temperature

    Fig. 2  Frequency distribution of the difference for relative humidity

    Table  1  AWS observations with significant difference to long time series in annual mean temperature(unit:℃)

  • [1]
    Jutta H, Cerhard M W. Homogenization of Various Climatological Parameters in the German Weather Service∥Proceedings of the First Seminar for Homogenization of Surface Climatological Data, Budapest, Hungary, 1996: 101-111.
    [2]
    Wendland W M, Armstrong W. Comparison of maximum-minimum resistance and liquid-in-glass thermometer records. J Atmos Ocean Tech, 1993(10): 233-237. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993JAtOT..10..233W
    [3]
    Quayle G, Easterling D R, Karl T R, et al. Effects of recent thermometer changes in the cooperative station network. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1991, 72: 1718-1723. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072<1718:EORTCI>2.0.CO;2
    [4]
    Guttman R N B, Baker C B. Exploratory analysis of the difference between temperature observations recorded by ASOS and conventional methods. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1996, 77: 2865-2873. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<2865:EAOTDB>2.0.CO;2
    [5]
    胡玉峰.自动与人工观测数据的差异.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(6):719-726. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040689&flag=1
    [6]
    王颖,刘小宁.自动站与人工观测气温的对比分析.应用气象学报, 2002, 13(6): 741-748. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020697&flag=1
    [7]
    连志鸾.自动站与人工站观测记录的差异分析. 气象, 2005, 31(3): 48-52. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200503011.htm
    [8]
    顾品强,王美华.Ⅱ 型自动站与常规站温湿度观测记录的比较.气象, 2003, 29(1): 35-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200301008.htm
    [9]
    任芝花,涂满红,陈永清, 等. 玻璃钢百叶箱与木制百叶箱内温湿度测量的对比分析. 气象, 2006, 32(5): 35-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200605005.htm
    [10]
    尹宪志,郭爱民,卢会云.CAWS型自动站与人工观测风速记录的对比分析. 干旱气象, 2006, 24(1): 57-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSQX200601011.htm
    [11]
    王立,冯海霞,胡宪林, 等.自动气象站与人工观测数据差异的原因分析. 成都信息工程学院学报, 2006, 21(4): 567-570. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDQX200604021.htm
    [12]
    王新华,罗四维,刘小宁, 等.国家级地面自动站A文件质量控制方法及软件开发.气象, 2006, 32(3): 107-112. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200603016.htm
    [13]
    吴乃军,胡玉峰,李佳.新一代中尺度自动气象站网络监测系统. 气象科技, 2005, 33(5): 460-468. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200505016.htm
    [14]
    刘小宁,任芝花.地面气象资料质量控制方法研究概述.气象科技, 2006, 33(3): 199-203. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200503001.htm
    [15]
    罗树如,胡玉峰,刘钧, 等.自动气象站综合探测网的构建. 气象科技, 2006, 34(2) : 184-187. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200602014.htm
    [16]
    龙先菊,马芳.自动与人工观测数据的差异分析. 河南气象, 2006, (2): 89-90. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNQX200602055.htm
    [17]
    吴凌志,李芸,宋莹华.自动气象站观测数据与人工观测数据的比较分析. 山东气象, 2004, 24(4): 31-32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDQX200404012.htm
    [18]
    刘多娇,王秀娟,庞松江.绥化市自动观测与人工观测数据的差异分析. 黑龙江气象, 2006, (2): 27-29. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJQ200602011.htm
    [19]
    熊安元,朱燕君,任芝花, 等.观测仪器和百叶箱的变化对地面气温观测值的影响及其原因分析.气象学报, 2006, 64(3): 377-384. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200603011.htm
    [20]
    中国气象局. 地面气象观测规范.北京: 气象出版社, 2003.
    [21]
    胡玉峰.自动气象站原理与测量方法.北京: 气象出版社, 2004
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(2)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (3420) PDF downloads(2356) Cited by()
    • Received : 2006-11-21
    • Accepted : 2007-04-02
    • Published : 2007-12-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint