He Caifen, Huang Xuanxuan, Ding Yeyi, et al. The artificial intelligence identification and filtering methods for non-meteorological radar echo in Ningbo. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(6): 856-864.
Citation: He Caifen, Huang Xuanxuan, Ding Yeyi, et al. The artificial intelligence identification and filtering methods for non-meteorological radar echo in Ningbo. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2007, 18(6): 856-864.

The Artificial Intelligence Identification and Filtering Methods for Non-meteorological Radar Echo in Ningbo

  • Received Date: 2007-01-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2007-07-11
  • Publish Date: 2007-12-31
  • The products of Doppler weather Surveillance Radar are occasionally contaminated by non-meteorological echo. For example, the accuracy and reliability of the precipitation-estimating products are reduced significantly by the clutter contamination. For the purpose of improving the accuracy of the products, the clutter removalwork should be firstly done before further developing new radar products. Statistical analysis of non-meteorological radar echo in Ningbo from 2003 to 2006 shows that these clutters mainly are normal propagation ground clutters (NPGC) and abnormal propagation ground clutters (APGC) . The radar-derived products are contaminated by the two types mostly. The following characteristics are shown: they are mostly common in low elevations, discrete distribution of reflectivity products, radial velocity values and spectrum widths values in clutter around zero occasionally mixing with high values and significant horizontal and vertical gradient. Based on echo characteristics and the traditional experience on clutter identification, a stationary safe multidimensional linear approximation algorithm simulating manual eyes' fuzzy logic is designed, which takes full account of the relationship between computation efficiency and data quality. The following three rules should be obeyed by clutter removal. The first is conservation, which is to avoid removing precipitation echoes improperly. The second is independency, that is different clutter is identified and filtered respectively. The third is diversity, that is to utilize three moments of R, V, W of more than two elevations (now use 0.5°and 1.5°) as many as possible and other real time data. The flow chart of clutter removal quality control is given and key points are as below: to build echo background to classify the echoes such as clear or light rain, moderate rain, heavy rain, the edge of strong echoes, strong echoes and strong clutters and so on, identification of isolated clutters, clutter filtering based on the horizontal and vertical reflectivity gradient, identification of small region where the reflectivity values have a sharp change. 190 cases have been tested with the techniques under weather conditions including clear sky, showers and deep convections. Results show that it works well, and has good performance to remove the nonmeteorological radar echoes completely and accurately within the range of 150 km. But out of the range, it doesn't operate well while the radial velocity is fussy. Because of the great horizontal and vertical gradient in small scale deep convective systems, for the sake of conservation, not only a very strict threshold is set but also the removal work is given up to protect the real precipitation echo where fussy radial velocity exists. The cases in the article prove that it doesn't cause wrong removal in small-scale deep convections. If satellite data, real time surface and sounding data can be combined together with radar base data, and time continuity of radar data is taken into account as well, the technique may probably be applied up to a valid range of 200 km even further away in the future.
  • Fig. 1  The Nigbo radar products of radia velocity and refelctivity before and after the filtering at 05:50 on June 13, 2006.

    (the distance between adjaceat circles is 50 km)

    Fig. 2  Same as in Fig.1, but for 06:55 on April 10, 2006

    Fig. 3  Same as in Fig.1, but for 11:54 on April 10, 2006

    Fig. 4  Same as in Fig.1, but for 05:55 on July 20, 2006

    Fig. 5  Same as in Fig.1, but for 23:00 on July 8, 2006

    Table  1  The contrast analysis on filtering impact in different ranges under the three instances and the percentage of reserved real precipitation

  • [1]
    Moszkowicz S, Ciach G J, Krajewski W F. Statistical detection of anomalous pattern in radar reflectivity patterns. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1994, 11: 1026-1034. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1026:SDOAPI>2.0.CO;2
    [2]
    Joss J, Lee R. The application of radar-gauge comparisons to operational precipitation profile corrections. J App Meteor, 1995, 34: 2612-2630. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2612:TAORCT>2.0.CO;2
    [3]
    Kessinger C, Ellis S, Andel J Van, The radar echo classifier: A fuzzy logic algorithm for the WSR-88D. 19th Int'Conf on Inter Inf Proc Sys (IIPS) for Meteor Ocean, and Hydr, Amer Meteor Soc, Long Beach, CA, 2003.
    [4]
    Saffle R E, Istok M J, Johnson L D. NEXRAD open systemsprogress and plans. Preprints, 17th international conference on interractive information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, American Meteorological Society, Albuquerque, NM, 14-18 Jan 2001: 97-100.
    [5]
    Kessinger C, Scott E, Andel J Van, et al. NEXRAD data quality optimization. NCAR Annual Report FY98, 154 pp.[Available from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Program, Atmospheric Technology Division, Boulder, CO 80307.] 1998.
    [6]
    Pratte F, Ecoff D, Andel J Van, et al. AP clutter mitigation in the WSR-88D. Preprints, 28th Radar Meteor.Conf., AMS, Austin, TX, 7-12 sep. 1997.
    [7]
    Zhang Jian, Wang Shunxin, Clarke Beth. WSR-88D reflectivity quality control using horizontal and vertical reflectivity structure .http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/81858.pdf.
    [8]
    Steiner M, Smith J A. Use of three-dimensional reflectivity sructure for atomated dtection and removal of nonprecipitating echoes in radar data. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2002, 19: 673-686. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0673:UOTDRS>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    Mircea Grecu, Witold F Krajew ski. An efficient methodology for detection of anomalous propagation echoes in radar reflectivity data using neural networks. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2000, 17 (2): 121-129. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0121:AEMFDO>2.0.CO;2
    [10]
    Pamment J A, Conway B J. Objective identification of echoes due to anomalous propagation in weather radar data. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 1998, 15:98-113. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0098:OIOEDT>2.0.CO;2
    [11]
    Joss J, Lee R W. The application of radar-gauge comparisons to operational precipitation profile corrections. J Appl Meteor, 1995, 34: 2612-2630. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2612:TAORCT>2.0.CO;2
    [12]
    Magaldi A, Bech J, Delgado G. Filtering weather radar AP echoes with MSG observations and NWP data. Proceedings of ERAD 2006.http://www.grahi.upc.edu/ERAD2006/proceedingsMask/00053.pdf.
    [13]
    Bovith T, Gill R S, Overgaard S, et al. Detecting weather radar clutter, using satellite-based nowcasting products. Proceedings of ERAD 2006.http://www.grahi.upc.edu/ERAD2006/proceedingsMask/00041.pdf.
    [14]
    刘黎平,王致君.双线偏振雷达探测的云和地物回波的特性及其识别方法. 高原气象, 1996, 15(3) : 303-310. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX603.005.htm
    [15]
    俞小鼎,姚秀萍,熊延南, 等. 多普勒天气雷达原理与业务应用. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006: 64.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (4334) PDF downloads(2577) Cited by()
    • Received : 2007-01-23
    • Accepted : 2007-07-11
    • Published : 2007-12-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint