Wu Dui, Liao Guoliang, Deng Xuejiao, et al. Transport condition of surface layer under haze weather over the Pearl River Delta. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2008, 19(1): 1-9.
Citation: Wu Dui, Liao Guoliang, Deng Xuejiao, et al. Transport condition of surface layer under haze weather over the Pearl River Delta. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2008, 19(1): 1-9.

Transport Condition of Surface Layer Under Haze Weather over the Pearl River Delta

  • Received Date: 2006-08-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2007-07-09
  • Publish Date: 2008-02-29
  • In recent years, the aerosol pollution over the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region is getting worse, resulting in haze weather with visibility decreasing and air quality deterioration. The surface layer transport condition such as airflow is closely related to the dilution and diffusion of atmospheric pollutants. By using statistic method under a set standard based on dataset from 466 Guangdong provincial surface automatic weather stations, Guangzhou operational weather stations, visibility data of PRD's atmospheric component observational network, and PM10 data of PRD's urban environmental observational network, typical haze weather and cleaning weather processes are analyzed in 2004 and 2005. The surface wind and its effect on heavy haze and cleaning weather processes are analyzed using Vector Sum Technique. The zonal circulation over Eastern Asia in favorite haze season in 2004 is stronger than that in 2005. The year with weak zonal circulation has marked exchange between the north and the south, allowing much cold air to cross Nanling Mountain to reach PRD, the accompanying strong wind is favor for the diffusion of the pollutants. In the year with strong zonal circulation cold air has little chance to cross Nanling Mountain to reach PRD so that the pollutants accumulate much easily. The haze weather over PRD has the regional features with the most likely occurrences in dry season and the least in rainy season. The haze processes often happen from October to next April, while cleaning processes often occur in the seasons when typhoon or cold air is prone to occurrence. Compared to 2004, the frequency of still wind is lower and the wind speed in dry season is larger in 2005, those factors are not favor for the form of haze weather. Analysis using Vector Sum Technique shows that regional haze process is closely related to the regional still wind process by which formation of airflow stagnation area is led to, while cleaning process is related to strong advection transport.
  • Fig. 1  Derived horizontal spatial vectors and schematic diagram

    Fig. 2  Series of zonal circulation indexes for Asia

    Fig. 3  Variation of mean wind speed in Guangzhou during 2004—2005

    Fig. 4  Mean stream field of the Pearl River Delta in 2004 (unit: m·s-1)

    Fig. 5  Same as in Fig.4, but for the year of 2005

    Fig. 6  Monthly variation of serious hazy days in Guangzhou

    (visibility <5 km, relative humidity <90%)

    Fig. 7  Scatter diagram for diurnal mean wind speed in the Pearl River Delta and VAPI in Guangzhou during Jan 1—13, 2004 (a) and Nov 12—24, 2005 (b)

    Fig. 8  Sum of wind vectors for 120 hours during Jan 5—9, 2004 (a) and Nov 16—20, 2005 (b)(unit : m·s-1)

    Table  1  Number of hazy days for six cities in the Pearl River Delta in 2004 and 2005 (unit:d)

    Table  2  Selection of weather processes for typical hazy weather

    Table  3  Selection of weather processes for clean control

    Table  4  Same as in Table 2, but for VAPI=73.9

    Table  5  Same as in Table 3, but for VAPI=73.9

  • [1]
    Ramanathan V, Crutzen P J, Mitra A P, et al. The Indian Ocean experiment and the Asian brown cloud. Current Science, 2002, 83 : 947-955. http://scrippsscholars.ucsd.edu/vramanathan/content/indian-ocean-experiment-and-asian-brown-cloud
    [2]
    吴兑, 邓雪娇, 毕雪岩, 等.细粒子污染形成灰霾天气导致广州地区能见度下降.热带气象学报, 2007, 23(1):1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX200701000.htm
    [3]
    吴兑, 毕雪岩, 邓雪娇, 等.珠江三角洲气溶胶云造成的严重灰霾天气.自然灾害学报, 2006, 15(6):77-83. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH200606013.htm
    [4]
    Wu D, Tie X, Deng X. Chemical characterizations of soluble aerosols in Southern China. Chemosphere, 2006, 64:749-757. doi:  10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.066
    [5]
    吴兑.关于霾与雾的区别和灰霾天气预警的讨论.气象, 2005, 31(4):3-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200504000.htm
    [6]
    蒋维楣, 曹文俊.空气污染气象学教程.北京:气象出版社, 1993:8-17.
    [7]
    邓雪娇, 毕雪岩, 吴兑, 等.广州番禺地区草地陆气相互作用观测研究.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(1):59-66. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060110&flag=1
    [8]
    邓雪娇, 李春晖, 毕雪岩, 等.南海季风建立前后珠江三角洲的陆气热量交换与热力边界层结构特征.气象学报, 2007, 65(2):280-292. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200702013.htm
    [9]
    邓雪娇, 黄健, 吴兑, 等.深圳地区典型大气污染过程分析.中国环境科学, 2006, 26(增刊):7-11. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHJ2006S1002.htm
    [10]
    赵庆云, 张武, 王式功.空气污染与大气能见度及环流特征的研究.高原气象, 2003, 22(4):394-396. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX200304012.htm
    [11]
    吴兑, 毕雪岩, 邓雪娇, 等.珠江三角洲大气灰霾导致能见度下降问题研究.气象学报, 2006, 64(4):510-517. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200604010.htm
    [12]
    吴兑.再论都市霾与雾的区别.气象, 2006, 32(4):9-15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200604001.htm
    [13]
    Wu D, Tie X, Li C, et al.An extremely low visibility event over the Guangzhou region:A case study.Atmos Environ, 2005, 39:6568-6577. doi:  10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.061
    [14]
    Feng Y, Wang A, Wu D, et al. The influence of tropical cyclone Melor on PM10 concentrations during an aerosol episode over the Pearl River Delta region of China: Numerical modeling versus observational analysis. Atmos Environ, 2007, 41 : 4349-4365. doi:  10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.055
    [15]
    康风琴, 肖稳安.我国南方MCC的涡度、水汽和热量收支平衡.高原气象, 2001, 20(3):332-339. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX200103016.htm
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(5)

    Article views (4876) PDF downloads(1830) Cited by()
    • Received : 2006-08-18
    • Accepted : 2007-07-09
    • Published : 2008-02-29

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint