Qiu Jinhuan, Xu Xiaofeng, Yang Jingmei. An accuracy estimation of global solar radiation measurements at meteorological observatories in China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2008, 19(3): 287-296.
Citation: Qiu Jinhuan, Xu Xiaofeng, Yang Jingmei. An accuracy estimation of global solar radiation measurements at meteorological observatories in China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2008, 19(3): 287-296.

An Accuracy Estimation of Global Solar Radiation Measurements at Meteorological Observatories in China

  • Received Date: 2007-03-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2008-01-15
  • Publish Date: 2008-06-30
  • When routine observations are performed by the pyranometer in the outside field, measurement errors will be caused by some factors, such as the polluted camera lens by which the measured value will be made less than the reality, as well as the temperature error, the cosine errorand the tilt error etc. Reliable accuracy estimation of the pyranometer-received global solar radiation (GSR) is significant to improve the use of the measurements. In the case of thin aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and small solar zenith angle, three characteristics of pyrheliometer-received GSR are presented. Compared with the diffuse solar radiation, the direct solar radiation contributes dominatingly to GSR; owing to the opposite shifts of direct and diffuse solar radiation with increasing AOT (the former decreases while the latter increases), GSR shows a weak sensitivity to AOT, molecular optical thickness, aerosol size distribution and refractive index; there is a small hemispherical reflectance and hence a weak sensitivity of GSR to the surface albedo. According to these properties, a method for accuracy estimation of GSR measurements at Chinese meteorological observatories is proposed. In the condition of cloud-free, thin AOT and small solar zenith angle, the solar constant (marked as E0, P) is retrieved from the GSR measurements and the broadband transmittance which is calculated using AOT retrieved from direct solar radiation. The deviation of the E0, P to the GRR (global radiation reference) is treated as an indicator of the uncertainty of GSR data. The simulations show that the uncertainties of the imaginary part of aerosol refractive index and the water vapor content are the two main error factors. Effects of random errors in input parameters such as aerosol optical properties, water vapor content and so on can be weakened by more statistical examples for the estimation, then more reasonable estimation results are produced. This method is applied to evaluating accuracies of GSR data at seven observatories which are Shenyang, Ejin Qi, Beijing, Urumqi, Golmud, Shanghai and Guangzhou in China. There are totally 1161 E0, P retrievals from GSR data in these seven observatories during 2000—2004, which are all measured in such conditions as clear (cloud-free) days; the solar zenith angle cosine (μ0) being larger than 0.7; τa(750 nm AOT) /μ0 < 0.3; the atmospheric column water vapor content being less than 2.0 cm. Among all these E0, P retrievals, the maximum deviation to GRR is 7.33 %, deviations of 97.78 %, E0, P retrievals are less than 5%, and the standard deviation is within 4.05% for every observatory. It is estimated that the uncertainty of GSR data in these observatories is usually better than 5% in the clear days and for μ0≥0.7.
  • Fig. 1  Broadband (0.3—3 μm) transmittances of direct, diffuse and global solar radiation versus 550 nm wavelength aerosol optical thickness for the wavelength-independent surface albedo of 0.05

    Fig. 2  Broadband (0.3—3 μm) transmittance of global solar radiation versus 550 nm wavelength aerosol optical thickness for three wavelength-independent surface albedo values of 0, 0.05 and 0.1

    Fig. 3  Relative error of global transmittance caused by aerosol size distribution uncertainty

    Fig. 4  Relative error of global transmittance caused by uncertainty in the imaginary part of aerosol refractive index

    Fig. 5  Relative error of global transmittance versus the error of aerosol optical thickness

    Fig. 6  Relative error of global transmittance versus the error of column water vapor content

    Fig. 7  Data number distributions in different ranges of relative deviations of the solar constant retrievals by the method to the WRR at four observatories (a) Ejin Qi, (b) Urumqi, (c) Golmud, (d) Beijing

    Table  1  The global transmittance errors caused by different surface albedo errors

    Table  2  Data number (N) of solar constants (E0, P) retrieved from this method, the average E0, P value and its relative deviation to WRR, root mean square (RMS) value and maximum value among N set of deviations of E0, P data to WRR, average column water vapor content W, average aerosol optical thickness at 750 nm τa(750 nm) and average solar zenith angle cosine (μ0)

  • [1]
    Martin W, Hans G, Andreas R, et al. From dimming to brightening: Decadal changes in solar radiation at earth's surface. Science, 2005, 308: 847-850. doi:  10.1126/science.1103215
    [2]
    Pinker R T, Zhang B, Dutton E G. Do satellites detect trends in surface solar radiation? Science, 2005, 308: 850-854. doi:  10.1126/science.1103159
    [3]
    Che H Z, Shi G Y, Zhang X Y, et al. Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from China, 1961—2000. Geophys Res Lett, 2005, 32, L06803: [DOI: 10.1029/2004GL022322]
    [4]
    Qiu Jinhuan. Cloud opticalthickness retrievals from ground-based pyranometer measurements.J Geophys Res, 2006, 111, D22206:[DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006792]
    [5]
    Qiu Jinhuan, Yang Liquan, Zhang Xiaoye. Characteristics of imaginary part and single scattering albedo of urban aerosol in northern China. Tellus, 2004, 53B: 72-82. doi:  10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00101.x/abstract
    [6]
    Zhang Y L, Qin B Q, Chen W M. Analysis of 40 year records of solar radiation data in Shanghai, Nanjing and Hangzhou in eastern China. Theor Appl Climatol, 2004, 78: 217-227. http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/775141?mode=full&submit_simple=Show+full+item+record
    [7]
    WMO. Radiation commission of IAMAP meeting of experts on aerosol and their climate effects. World Meteorological Organization Rep, WCP55, 1983:28-30.
    [8]
    中国气象局.气象辐射观测方法.北京:气象出版社, 1996: 1-165.
    [9]
    王炳忠.太阳辐射能的测量与标准.北京:科学出版社, 1993: 327-334.
    [10]
    Qiu Jinhuan. Theoretical analysis of retrieving atmospheric column Mie optical depth from downward total solar radiative flux. Adv Atmos Sci, 1989, 6: 313-323. doi:  10.1007/BF02661537
    [11]
    Moody E G, King M D, Platnick S, et al. Spatially complete global spectral surface albedos:Value-added datasets derived from Terra MODIS land products. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2005, 43: 144-158. doi:  10.1109/TGRS.2004.838359
    [12]
    Qiu Jinhuan. Broadband extinction method to determine atmospheric aerosol optical properties.Tellus, 2001, 53B: 72-82. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=966988
    [13]
    Qiu Jinhuan. Broadband extinction method to determine aerosol optical depth from accumulated solar direct radiation. J Appl Meteor, 2003, 42: 1611-1623. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1611:BEMTDA>2.0.CO;2
    [14]
    杨景梅, 邱金桓.用地面湿度参量计算我国整层大气可降水量及有效水汽含量方法的研究.大气科学, 2002, 26:9-22. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200201001.htm
    [15]
    Qiu Jinhuan, Yang Jingmei. Absorption properties of urban/suburban aerosols in China. Adv Atmos Sci, 2008, 25: 1-10. doi:  10.1007%2Fs00376-008-0001-0
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (4058) PDF downloads(1655) Cited by()
    • Received : 2007-03-21
    • Accepted : 2008-01-15
    • Published : 2008-06-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint