Jiang Yuan, Liu Liping, Zhuang Wei. Statistical characteristics of clutter and improvements of ground clutter identification technique with Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(2): 203-213.
Citation: Jiang Yuan, Liu Liping, Zhuang Wei. Statistical characteristics of clutter and improvements of ground clutter identification technique with Doppler weather radar. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(2): 203-213.

Statistical Characteristics of Clutter and Improvements of Ground Clutter Identification Technique with Doppler Weather Radar

  • Received Date: 2008-02-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2009-02-11
  • Publish Date: 2009-04-30
  • Radar echoes caused by non-meteorological targets significantly affect radar data quality, and contaminated bins by ground clutter should be identified and eliminated before precipitation can be quantitatively estimated from radar data. An automatic algorithm for ground clutter detection is developed and examined. The algorithm is based on fuzzy logic, using volume scanning radar raw data. It uses some statistics to highlight clutter characteristics, such as shallow vertical extent, high spatial variability, and low radial velocities. A value that quantifies the possibility of each bin being affected by clutter is derived, and then certain impacts can be eliminated when this factor exceeds acertain threshold. The ground clutter points in sample data are distinguished empirically. In order to reduce the identified inaccuracy of the precipitation echoes with least infections on the ground clutter identified veracity, the optimal membership functions are determined by analyzing statistic the precipitation and ground clutter with the critical success index (CSI) based on the standard ground clutter and precipitation data. CSI is obtained based on the identified veracity through all samples includes clutters and precipitation of each function performs. The performance of this algorithm (MOP) is compared against that of the original one such as China currently available membership function (MCH) and American membership function (MAM) by testing with statistical analysis, individual cases analysis, and inaccurate result analysis methods. Satisfactory results are obtained from an exhaustive evaluation of this algorithm, especially in the cases where anomalous propagation plays an important role. It turns out six characteristic parameters including TDBZ, GDBZ, SPIN, MDVE, MDSW, SDVE can retrieve precipitation echo and clutters well. Radial velocity used in algorithm shows it is good for echo classifying, it will reduce the possibility of identifying the precipitation echo to clutter. The membership functions got from CSI show better result than the original one, especially in distinguishing the precipitation echo from clutter. The algorithm performs well, but the result isn't hundred-percent correct yet. Through individual case analysis, it's found out the cause for the wrong classifying is echo intensity's horizontal texture and velocity's range unfold which is unavoidable, but it proves velocity data can improve the echo classifying result too. Radar data quality control is a complicated question, just using radar data is not enough to reach a perfect outcome. Satellite or automatic weather station data can be imported to make the result more authentic. And the most effective work on radar data quality control is to combine the manual work to the algorithm, through which all kinds of data problems recognized by auto algorithm can be solved. Radar echo classifying is still a key point in radar data quality control, radar data quality will not be totally exact until the radar echo characteristic is acknowledged and the right way to work it out is chosen, and that will have great effect on the application of radar data.
  • Fig. 1  PPI of Tianjin rader at 12:13 on June 21, 2005 (a) echo intensity, (b) radial velocity, (c) echo classify

    (red rows point to AP (anomalous propagation) clutter, elevation:0.4°, interval of range circles:50km;CL shows clutter, CC shows convective cloud, SC shows stratiform cloud, CA shows clear-air echoes)

    Fig. 2  Probability distribution curves about clutter and precipitation of each characteristic parameter

    (CL shows clutter, CC shows convective cloud, SC shows stratiform cloud)

    Fig. 3  Comparison of clutter identifiable membership functions MAM and MCH and the MOP

    Fig. 4  PPI of Tianjin rader at 11:18 on July 7 2007 (red rows point to MOP clutter, grey block shows the AP clutter that identified correctly, real line circle point to the wrong identification after echo classify)

    (a) reflectivity at 0.4°elevation before echo classify, (b) radial velocity at 0.4°elevation before echo classify, (c) reflectivity at 1.3°elevation before echo classify, (d) radial velocity at 1.3°elevation before echo classify, (e) reflectivity at 0.4°elevation after echo classify with MOP, (f) reflectivity at 0.4°elevatation after echo classify with MCH

    Fig. 5  PPI of Beijing radar at 17:18 on October 6, 2007( red rows point to MOP clutter, grey block shows AP clutter that identified correct, real line circle point to the wrong identification after echo classify, and the broken line circle shows improvement of this method comparing to the method before)

    (a) reflectivity at 0.6°elevation before echo classify, (b) radial velocity at 0. 6°elevation before echo classify, (c) reflectivity at 1.6°elevation before echo classify, (d) radial velocity at 1. 6°elevation before echo classify, (e) reflectivity at 0.6°elevation after echo classify withMOP, (f) reflectivity at 0.6°elevatation after echo classify with MCH

    Table  1  Identifiable accuracy of each characteristic parameter with different membership function(unit: % )

    Table  2  Identifiable accuracy for clutter and precipitation echo and erroneous recognition for precipitation echo (unit: % )

    Table  3  Identifiable accuracy for clutter and precipitation echo and erroneous recognition for precipitation echo with only echo intensity(unit:%)

  • [1]
    Hogg W D. Quality Control and Analysis of an Archive of Digital Radar Data∥Preprints, 18th Conf on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1978: 150-154 .
    [2]
    Smith P L. Precipitation Measurement and Hydrology∥Panel report: Radar in Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1990: 607-618
    [3]
    Mueller E A, Sims A L. Statistics of High Radar Reflectivity Gradients∥Preprints, 16th Radar Meteorology Conf, Amer Meteor Soc, 1975: 401-403
    [4]
    Riley G F, Austin P M. Some Statistics of Gradients of Precipitation Intensity∥Preprints, 17th Conf on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1976: 492-497 .
    [5]
    Collier C G, Lovejoy S, Austin G L. Analysis of Bright Bands from 3-D Radar Data∥Preprints, 19th Conf on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1980: 44-47.
    [6]
    Rosenfeld D, Amitai E, Wolff D B. Classification of rain regimes by the three-dimensional properties of reflectivity fields. J Appl Meteo, 1995, 34 :198-211. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0198:CORRBT>2.0.CO;2
    [7]
    Fulton R A, Breidenbach J P, Seo D J. The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea Forecasting, 1998, 13: 377-395. doi:  10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0377:TWRA>2.0.CO;2
    [8]
    Steiner M, Smith J A. Use of three-dimensional reflectivity structure for automated detection and removal of nonprecipitating echoes in radar data. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2002, 19 :673-686. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0673:UOTDRS>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    Joe P. Classification of Radar Imagery Using Texture Analyses∥Preprints, 25th Int Conf on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1991: 107-110
    [10]
    Giuli D, Gherardelli M, Freni T A. Rainfall and clutter discrimination by means of dual-linear polarization radar measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1991, 8 : 777-789. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(1991)008<0777:RACDBM>2.0.CO;2
    [11]
    Pratte J F, Gagnon R, Corneliu s R. Ground Clutter Characteristics and Residue Mapping ∥Preprints, 26th Int Conf on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 1993:50-52 .
    [12]
    Grecu M, Krajewski W F. Detection of anomalous propagation echoes in weather radar data using neural networks. IEEE Tran Geosc Remote Sens, 1999, 37: 287-296. doi:  10.1109/36.739163
    [13]
    Grecu M, Krajewski W F. An efficient methodology for detection of anomalous propagation echoes in radar reflectivity data using neural networks. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2000, 17: 121-129. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0121:AEMFDO>2.0.CO;2
    [14]
    Kessinger C, Ellis S, Vanandel J, et al. The AP Clutter Mitiga-tion Scheme for the WSR-88D ∥Preprints, 31st Conference on Radar Meteorology, Amer Meteor Soc, 2003 :526-529 .
    [15]
    Zhang J, Wang S, Clarke B. WSR-88D Reflectivity Quality Control Using Horizontal and Vertical Reflectivity Structure∥Preprints, the 11th Conference on Aviation, AMS, 2004, P5.4
    [16]
    刘黎平, 吴林林, 杨引明.基于模糊逻辑的分步式超折射地物回波识别方法的建立和效果分析.气象学报, 2007, 65(2): 252-260. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200702010.htm
    [17]
    Lakshmanan V, Hondl K, Stumpf G, et al. Quality Control of Weather Radar Data using Texture Features and a Neural Network ∥5th Internatinal Conf on Adv in Patt Recogn , IEEE, 2003 .
    [18]
    Da Silveira R B, Holt A R. An automatic identification of clutter and anomalous propagation in polarizationdiversity weather radar data using neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sen, 2001, 39: 1777-1788. doi:  10.1109/36.942556
    [19]
    俞小鼎, 张爱民, 郑媛媛, 等.一次系列下击暴流事件的多普勒天气雷达分析.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(4):385-393. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060466&flag=1
    [20]
    陈明轩, 俞小鼎, 谭晓光, 等.北京2004年"7.10"突发性对流强降水的雷达回波特征分析.应用气象学报, 2006, 17(3): 333-345. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20090210&flag=1
    [21]
    张亚萍, 程明虎, 徐慧, 等.雷达定量测量降水在佛子岭流域径流模拟中的应用.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3): 295-305. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070351&flag=1
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (5584) PDF downloads(2434) Cited by()
    • Received : 2008-02-27
    • Accepted : 2009-02-11
    • Published : 2009-04-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint