Yang Chengyin, Wang Hanjie, Zhou Lin, et al. An interpretation scheme on numerical products of prediction system based upon full-scale information. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(2): 232-239.
Citation: Yang Chengyin, Wang Hanjie, Zhou Lin, et al. An interpretation scheme on numerical products of prediction system based upon full-scale information. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(2): 232-239.

An Interpretation Scheme on Numerical Products of Prediction System Based upon Full-scale Information

  • Received Date: 2008-07-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2008-11-12
  • Publish Date: 2009-04-30
  • It is difficult to improve the accuracy of short-term numerical climate prediction in the scale of a month or so at present. A nonlinear interpretation model that uses full-scale information of the numerical products is proved to be effective in raising the accuracy of shot-term climate prediction. Besides, the interpretation method is the only way to interpret the grid data of numerical system to stations. Nowadays, most interpretive approaches are based on the MOS (Model Output Statistics). Some potential imperfectness of this method lay in the facts that it can't use full-scale information synthetically and effectively, besides some systematic errors. The change of mean meteorological element may not be reflected from the grid data around the stations, however, it may have some uncertain connections with other grid data beyond the station. If the factors of two dimensions which reflect full-scale information are used, the result of prediction may be improved. Canonical variables are constituted using CCA-BP method, which mainly represents covariance between factors and the predictive variables. The relativity between new-formed composed factors and the predictive variables increases significantly, hence a nonlinear regression model is developed by BPNN method. However, the canonical variables may be influenced by some local change greatly. Thus the canonical variables in the predictive equation should be examined through long-term stability test, to use those stable and effective ones. The interpretation scheme is used to establish the predictive equations for 10-day average temperature and rainfall anomalous percentage in October of Pingtan and Fuzhou, China. The 4-year forecast experiment results indicate that interpretation improves the numerical prediction products remarkably and the prediction accuracy increases evidently. According to the evaluating index, the CCA-BP-BPNN (abridged as C-B method below) is superior to the interpolation method and gives a new way of interpretation prediction of the short-term climate prediction products. Statistics of 4-year prediction results using the present C-B method from 2002-2005 shows, both the prediction accuracy (TT) and anomalous relationship coefficients (ACC) of temperature and precipitation of Pingtan and Fuzhou increase comparing with the interpolation method results and the model outputs of MM5, while the mean absolute errors (MAE) and mean square-root errors (MSE) decrease.The 23 years long dataset used in the experiment makes the monthly prediction variables a sample size of 23 and the 10-day prediction variables a sample size of 69. It is statistically acceptable but not as good as expected. For the interpretation prediction, longer the data series brings better results. Besides, selection and composition of the factors are endless jobs for regression model establishment. With the accumulation of numerical prediction products and the factor optimization procedure used in the CCA-BP-BPNN model improvement, the forecast accuracy will be increased in the future. Limited by the shortage of data and capability of computing, only 2 southeast coastal stations are involved in the test, but the results are satisfactory. However, the adaptability of this model in northern and western region with great climatic variability still needs validating with a mass of case studies.
  • Fig. 1  The coefficient between MM5 output of 10-meter wind and 10-day average temperature in October of Pingtan

    Fig. 2  The coefficient of interpolation variables and canonical variables to 10-day average temperature in October of Pingtan

    Fig. 3  Fitting of 10-day average temperature in October during 1983-2001 of Pingtan

    Fig. 4  Forecast of 10-day average temperature in October during 2002-2005 of Pingtan and Fuzhou

    Fig. 5  Forecast of rainfall anomalous percentage in October during 2002-2005 of Pingtan and Fuzhou

    Table  1  Final selected canonical variables

    Table  2  The result of forecast of 10-day average temperature in October during 2002-2005 of Pingtan and Fuzhou from two models

    Table  3  The result of forecast of rainfall anomalous percentage in October during 2002—2005 of Pingtan and Fuzhou from two models

  • [1]
    刘还珠, 赵声蓉, 陆志善, 等.国家气象中心气象要素的客观预报-MOS系统.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(2): 181-191. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040223&flag=1
    [2]
    丑纪范.为什么要动力-统计相结合? ————兼论如何结合.高原气象, 1986, 5(4): 367-372. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX198604008.htm
    [3]
    陈豫英, 陈晓光, 马金仁, 等.基于MM5模式的精细化MOS温度预报.干旱气象, 2005, 23(4): 52-56. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSQX200504009.htm
    [4]
    吴滨, 蔡学湛.用典型相关分析预测福建前汛期降水.气象科技, 2005, 33(1): 32-36. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200501006.htm
    [5]
    毛恒青, 李小泉.典型相关分析 (CCA) 对我国冬季气温的短期气候预测试验.应用气象学报, 1994, 5(4): 386-391. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX704.000.htm
    [6]
    林纾, 陈丽娟, 陈彦山, 等.月动力延伸预报产品在西北地区月降水预测中的释用.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(4): 555-560. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070486&flag=1
    [7]
    Aristita Busuioc, Chen Deliang, Hellstrom Ccilia. Performance of statistical downscaling models in GCM validation and regional climate change estimates: Application for Swedish precipitation.Inter J Climatology, 2002, 21 : 557-578. doi:  10.1002/joc.624/abstract
    [8]
    吴洪宝, 吴蕾.气候变率诊断和预报方法.北京:气象出版社, 2005 : 136-141.
    [9]
    胡江林, 张礼平, 宇如聪.神经网络模型预报湖北汛期降水量的应用研究.气象学报, 2001, 59(6): 713-719. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200106013.htm
    [10]
    何慧, 金龙, 覃志年, 等.基于BP神经网络模型的广西月降水量降尺度预报.热带气象学报, 2007, 23(1): 72-77. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDQX200701011.htm
    [11]
    陈桂英, 赵振国.短期气候预测评估方法和业务初估.应用气象学报, 1998, 9(2): 178-185. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19980225&flag=1
    [12]
    谢考现, 崔秀兰, 刁秀广.短期气候预测因子的选取及利用.气象科技, 1999, (2): 26-30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ902.004.htm
    [13]
    马振峰, 陈洪. T63月延伸预报在西南区域短期气候预测中的应用研究.应用气象学报, 1999, 10(3): 368-373. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990373&flag=1
    [14]
    周开利, 康耀红.神经网络模型及其MATLAB仿真程序设计.北京:清华大学出版社, 2006: 69-101.
    [15]
    武妍, 张立明.神经网络的泛化能力与结构优化算法研究.计算机应用研究, 2002, 19(6): 21-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYJ200206006.htm
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (3480) PDF downloads(1853) Cited by()
    • Received : 2008-07-04
    • Accepted : 2008-11-12
    • Published : 2009-04-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint