Wang Minyan, Wang Bomin. Total cloud amount difference between ISCCP product and ground observation over China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(4): 411-418.
Citation: Wang Minyan, Wang Bomin. Total cloud amount difference between ISCCP product and ground observation over China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(4): 411-418.

Total Cloud Amount Difference Between ISCCP Product and Ground Observation over China

  • Received Date: 2008-09-02
  • Rev Recd Date: 2009-03-23
  • Publish Date: 2009-08-31
  • ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) is an international authorized objective climatology project on cloud study. It has provided valuable data to studying the budget of global cloud and radiation, the distribution of cloud and water since 1983. The spatial and temporal total cloud amount differences are investigated using ISCCP D2 product and cloud dataset of ground observation over China during 1984—2006, based upon the analysis on the differences of cloud amount observation between the satellite platform and the ground observation. Due to the difference between the detection method and ability, observation coverage and time, inconstancy of cloud top/base, cloud height, cloud thickness, and cloud vertical distribution, the total cloud amount from satellite platform are different from that of surface dataset value. The quantitative analysis results show, although the two datasets show the consistent characteristics of total cloud amount distribution and climatology variation, regional differences are still remarkable. Based on the total cloud amount data from 568 surface stations, a new total cloud amount gird data series is formed with the reference of ISCCP D2 girds. Total cloud amount from satellite data is 8.46% higher than that given by surface data in the comparable 145 satellite-surface grids over China on average. The total cloud amount difference is smaller in the southern region, and larger in the northeastern region. It is closely related with the difference of detection method, cloud properties in different regions and the natural geography factors. With the 172 ISCCP D2 grids and 568 ground stations, the climate change trend is compared and analyzed. The annual variation of total cloud amount derived from the ISCCP D2 product and ground observation is accordant in the 5 regions (the northwest region, Tibetan Plateau region, the northeast region, the north of China and the south of China) during the period of 1984—2006. The total cloud amount decreases over China in the recent 23 years, the trend from ISCCP D2 product 0.015% per year is less than that from the ground observation, 0.063%per year. The total cloud amount increases slowly in the northeastern region, while decreases in Tibetan Plateau region and the northwestern region. With integral anomaly method, it shows the total cloud amount decreases in 1984—2001 and increases rapidly in 2002—2006 using satellite and surface data. The causes that total cloud amount from the two datasets (ISCCP D2 product and ground observation) over China have difference, and the quantitative results on spatial-distribution difference of total cloud amount and the trend of climate change, are helpful to further study on the cloud amount, radiation balance, and the promotion of climate models' performances.
  • Fig. 1  Total cloud amount of ISCCP D2 product (a) and ground observation (b) during 1984-2006(unit:%)

    Fig. 2  Location of 145 grids to compare total cloud amount of 2.5°×2.5°ISCCP D2 product and ground observation

    Fig. 3  Gridded total cloud amount difference between ISCCP D2 product and ground observation during 1984-2006(unit:%)

    Fig. 4  Inter-annual variation of grided total cloud amount of ISCCP D2 product and ground observation in the sub-regions during 1984-2006

    Fig. 5  Total cloud amount inter-annual variation of 172 ISCCP D2 grids and 568 stations (a) and their integral anomalies (b) during 1984-2006

    Table  1  Scope of the sub-regions, grid number, average station number, grided total cloud amount of ISCCP D2 product, ground observation during 1984-2006

    Table  2  Relativity of total cloud inter-amount annual variation from satellite and ground observation results in the sub-regions

  • [1]
    Yu H, Kaufman Y J, Chin M, et al. A review of measurement-based as sessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2006, 6: 613-666. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29621094_A_review_of_measurement-based_assessments_of_the_aerosol_direct_radiative_effect_and_forcing
    [2]
    Stephens G S, Kummerow G D. The remote sensing of clouds and precipitation from space:A review. J Atmos Sci, 2007, 64(11):3742-3765. doi:  10.1175/2006JAS2375.1
    [3]
    Webb M J, Senior C A, Sexton D M H, et al. On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. ClimateDynamics, 2006, 27:17-38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30846625_On_the_contribution_of_local_feedback_mechanisms_to_the_range_of_climate_sensitivity_in_two_GCM_ensembles
    [4]
    Ronald M Errico, George Ohring, Weng Fuzhong, et al. Assimilation of satellite cloud and precipitation observations in numerical weather prediction models:Introduction to the JAS special collection. J Atmos Sci, 2007, 64(11):3737-3741. doi:  10.1175/2007JAS2622.1
    [5]
    Schiffer R A, Rossow W B. The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP):The First Project of the World Climate Research Programme. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1983, 64(7):779-784. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/international-satellite-cloud-climatology-project-isccp-first-project-world-climate-research-program/
    [6]
    Rossow W B, Walker A W, Garder L C. Comparison of ISCCP and other cloud amounts. J Climate, 1993, 6:2394-2418. doi:  10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2394:COIAOC>2.0.CO;2
    [7]
    Bryan C Weare. Near-global observations of low clouds. J Climate, 2000, 13(7):1255-1268. doi:  10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1255:NGOOLC>2.0.CO;2
    [8]
    Hahn Carole J, William B Rossow, Stephen G Warren. ISCCP cloud properties associated with standard cloud types identified in individual surface observations. J Climate, 2001, 14 (1):11-28. doi:  10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0011:ICPAWS>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    Rossow W B, Garder L C. Cloud detection using satellite measurements of infrared and visible radiances for ISCCP. J Climate, 1993, 6:2341-2369. doi:  10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2341:CDUSMO>2.0.CO;2
    [10]
    Mokhov I I, Schlesinger M E. Analysis of global cloudiness 1. Comparison of Meteor, Nimbus 7, and International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) satellite data. J Geophys Res Atmos, 1998(D7):12849-12868. doi:  10.1029/93JD00530/citedby
    [11]
    魏丽, 钟强, 侯萍.中国大陆卫星反演云参数的评估.高原气象, 1996, 15(2):147-156. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX602.002.htm
    [12]
    翁笃鸣, 韩爱梅.我国卫星总云量与地面总云量分布的对比分析.应用气象学报, 1998, 9(1):32-37. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19980105&flag=1
    [13]
    王可丽, 江灏, 陈世强.青藏高原地区的总云量—地面观测、卫星反演和同化资料的对比分析.高原气象, 2001, 20(3): 252-257. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYQX200103004.htm
    [14]
    刘洪利, 朱文琴, 宜树华, 等.中国地区云的气候特征分析.气象学报, 2003, 61(4):465-473. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200304007.htm
    [15]
    宜树华, 刘洪利, 李维亮, 等.中国西北地区云时空分布特征的初步分析.气象, 2003, 29(1):7-11. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200301001.htm
    [16]
    丁守国, 石广玉, 赵春生.利用ISCCP D2资料分析近20年全球不同云类云量的变化及其对气候可能的影响.科学通报, 2004, 49(11):1105-1111. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200411016.htm
    [17]
    刘瑞霞, 刘玉洁, 杜秉玉.中国云气候特征的分析.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(4):468-476. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20040456&flag=1
    [18]
    Li Yunying, Yu Rucong, Xu Youping, et al. Spatial distribution and seasonal variation of cloud over China based on ISCCP data and surface observations. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2004, 82(2):761-773. doi:  10.2151/jmsj.2004.761
    [19]
    Chang F L, Li Z. A near-global climatology of single-layer and overlapped clouds and their optical properties retrieved from TE RRA/ MODIS data using a new algorithm. J Climate, 2005, 18: 4752-4771. doi:  10.1175/JCLI3553.1
    [20]
    Hahn C J, Warren S G, London J. The effect of moonlight on observation of cloud cover at night, and application to cloud climatology. J Climate, 1995(8):1429-1446. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23843086_The_Effect_of_Moonlight_on_Observation_of_Cloud_Cover_at_Night_and_Application_to_Cloud_Climatology
    [21]
    Rossow W B, Schiffer R A. ISCCP cloud data products. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1991, 72(1):2-20. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072<0002:ICDP>2.0.CO;2
    [22]
    李晓文, 李维亮, 周秀骥.中国近30年太阳辐射状况研究.应用气象学报, 1998, 9(1):24-31. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19980104&flag=1
    [23]
    Kaiser D P. Analysis of total cloud amount over China, 1951—1994. Geophys Res Let, 1998, 25:3599-3602. doi:  10.1029/98GL52784
    [24]
    Kaiser D P. Decreasing cloudiness over China:An updated analysis examining additional variables. Geophys Res Let, 2000, 27(15):2193-2196. doi:  10.1029/2000GL011358
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (4767) PDF downloads(1318) Cited by()
    • Received : 2008-09-02
    • Accepted : 2009-03-23
    • Published : 2009-08-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint