Yang Jun, Lǜ Weitao, Ma Ying, et al. An automatic ground-based cloud detection method based on adaptive threshold. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(6): 713-721.
Citation: Yang Jun, Lǜ Weitao, Ma Ying, et al. An automatic ground-based cloud detection method based on adaptive threshold. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2009, 20(6): 713-721.

An Automatic Ground-based Cloud Detection Method Based on Adaptive Threshold

  • Received Date: 2008-10-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-01-13
  • Publish Date: 2009-12-31
  • Clouds affect the energy balance of the earth by means of absorbing and scattering radiation, and they have notable influences on global climate. It is very important to monitor clouds and there are several meteorological satellites providing sky-based large-scale scope clouds observations round-the-clock. However, the ground-based cloud observations mainly depend on visual judgments of the meteorological observers, which have become a bottleneck of automatic meteorological observation.Computing cloudage automatically is very important, and cloud detection is the basis of cloudage computation.Up to now, the mature ground-based cloud detection methods are still based on thresholds.For instance, the threshold 1.3 is recommended for ratio of ground-based blue band and red band observations. However, considering the complexity of clouds, a fixed threshold obviously cannot obtain satisfactory detection effect for different types of clouds. In clear sky, clouds are white against the blue background, so an automatic ground-based clouds detection method can be established in terms of the maximum interclass variance adaptive threshold selection. Ratio, difference, normalized difference of blue band and red band are calculated respectively, then bimodal distributing can be found in the image gray histogram, and then an adaptive threshold can be obtained using the maximum interclass variance method. Compare the band operation result with the adaptive threshold pixel by pixel, a pixel whose gray value is less than the adaptive threshold can be regarded as cloud pixel, else non-cloud pixel.Using this rule, the cloud regions can be separated from the sky background.Three different types of ground-based clouds are analyzed, and the proposed adaptive threshold method performs more appropriately comparing with fixed threshold cloud detection method.The blue band and red band ratio method can detect the maximum cloudage, and the difference operation method can detect the minimum cloudage. But quantitative assessment results show that, the ratio method mistakes many non-cloud pixels into clouds, while the norm alized difference processing is satisfactory both in correctness and accuracy. It should be pointed out that the proposed method applies only to clear sky, as for other weather conditions, more researches are needed.
  • Fig. 1  Ground-based cloud detection based on fixed threshold

    (a)cloud image 1, (b)result of cloud image 1, (c)cloud image 2, (d)result of cloud image 2

    Fig. 2  The flow chart of ground-based cloud automatic detection

    Fig. 3  Adaptive threshold detection for cloud image 1

    (a)ratio operation, (b)adaptive threshold detection result of ratio, (c)difference operation, (d)adaptive threshold detection result of difference, (e)normalized difference operation, (f)adaptive threshold detection result of normalized difference

    Fig. 4  Histograms after blue and red band processing

    (a)ratio operation, (b)difference operation, (c)normalized difference operation

    Fig. 5  Adaptive threshold detection for cloud image 2

    (a)cloud image 2, (b)detection result of ratio, (c)detection result of difference, (d)detection result of normalized difference

    Fig. 6  A daptive threshold de tection for cloud image 3

    (a)cloud image 3, (b)detection result of ratio, (c)detection result of difference, (d)detection result of normalized difference

    Fig. 7  Cloud masks of manua l interpretation

    (a)mask of cloud image 1, (b)mask of cloud image 2, (c)mask of cloud image 3

    Table  1  Precision assessment for cloud detection

  • [1]
    Baum BA, Vasanth T, Tay T, et al. Automated cloud classification of global AVHRR data using a Fuzzy logic approach. JAppl Meteor, 1997, 36(11):1519 -1535. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1519:ACCOGA>2.0.CO;2
    [2]
    Bin T, Shaikh M A, Azimi-Sadjadi M R, et al. A study of cloud classification with neural networks using spectraland textural features. IEEE Trans Neural Networks, 1999, 10(1) : 138-151. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/737500/?arnumber=737500&openedRefinements%3D*%26filter%3DAND(AND(NOT(4283010803)), AND(NOT(4283010803)))%26rowsPerPage%3D100%26queryText%3D(spectral%20data%20and%20neural%20networks%20)
    [3]
    Hulley GC, Hook S J. A new methodology for cloud detec-tion and classification with ASTER data. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35, L16812, doi:10.1029/2008G L034644.
    [4]
    师春香, 瞿建华.用神经网络方法对NOAA-AVHRR资料进行云客观分类.气象学报, 2002, 60(2):250-255. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200202016.htm
    [5]
    刘希, 许健民, 杜秉玉.用双通道动态阈值对GMS-5图像进行自动云检测.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(4):434-444. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050454&flag=1
    [6]
    马芳, 张强, 郭铌, 等.多通道卫星云图云检测方法的研究.大气科学, 2007, 31(1):119-128. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200701011.htm
    [7]
    刘瑞云, 罗敬宁, 郭陆军.利用TOVS资料测雪.应用气象学报, 1999, 10(1):88-93. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990146&flag=1
    [8]
    Davis G B, Griggs D J, Sullivan G D.Automatices timation of cloud amount using computer vision. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 1992, 9(1):81 -85. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(1992)009<0081:AEOCAU>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    Souza-echer M P, Pereira E B, Bins L S, et al. A simple method for the assessment of the cloud cover state in high-latitude regions by a ground -based digital camera. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 2006, 23(3):437 -447. doi:  10.1175/JTECH1833.1
    [10]
    Buch K A Jr, Sun C H , Thorne L R. Cloud Classification U-sing Whole-sky Imager Data. 9 th Symposium on Meteoro-logical Observations and Instrumentation. Charlotte , North Carolina , 1995
    [11]
    Slater D W, Long C N, Tooman T P. Total Sky Imager/ Whole Sky Imager Cloud Fraction Comparison ∥ Eleventh ARM Science Team Meeting Proceeding.Atlanta, Georgia, 2001.
    [12]
    Kassianov E, Long C N, Ovtchinnikov M. Cloud sky cover versus cloud fraction:Whole-sky simulation sand observa-tions.J Appl Meteor, 2005, 44(1):86-98.
    [13]
    霍娟, 吕达仁.全天空数字相机观测云量的初步研究.南京气象学院学报, 2002, 35(2):242 -246. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJQX200202014.htm
    [14]
    霍娟, 吕达仁.晴空与有云大气辐射分布的数值模拟及其对全天空图像云识别的应用.气象学报, 2006, 64(1):31-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200601002.htm
    [15]
    霍娟, 吕达仁, 王越.全天空云识别阈值法的数值模拟初步研究.自然科学进展, 2006, 16(4):480-484. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKJZ200604017.htm
    [16]
    Otsu N.A threshold selection method from gray level histo-grams. IEEE Trans Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1):62 -66. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4310076/?reload=true&arnumber=4310076
    [17]
    Shu felt J A.Performance evaluation and analysis of monocular building extraction from aerial imagery. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1999, 21(4) : 311 -326. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/761262/
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(7)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (3920) PDF downloads(2433) Cited by()
    • Received : 2008-10-14
    • Accepted : 2016-01-13
    • Published : 2009-12-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint