Zheng Xiangdong, Wei Xiaoli. Long term total ozone comparisons between space based and ground based observations at 4 sites in China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(1): 1-10.
Citation: Zheng Xiangdong, Wei Xiaoli. Long term total ozone comparisons between space based and ground based observations at 4 sites in China. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(1): 1-10.

Long term Total Ozone Comparisons Between Space based and Ground based Observations at 4 Sites in China

  • Received Date: 2009-05-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2009-12-15
  • Publish Date: 2010-02-28
  • The observed total ozone differences between ground based data and available satellite products over Xianghe, Kunming, Waliguan and Longfengshan are analyzed. The absolute differences of total ozone between space based and ground based observations are-5—10 DU. And the relatives differences (RD) is—5%—4%, fitting the normal distribution of 0.05 significance. Compared with the ground based observation, the precision of TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrophotometer) version total ozone is better than that of DOAS (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy). Total ozone RDs are statistically similar at Xianghe and Longfengshan where total ozone is high, while the similarity of RDs are also detected at low total ozone region Kunming and Waliguan. The regional similarities also indicate in the sensitivity validations of total ozone RDs to the SZA (solar zenith angle) and total ozone references. The integrated total ozone dataset with the ground based and TOMS as well as OMI observations in the 4 proxy sites also reflect the substantial depletion of global total ozone event around 1993. An eventual recover trend emerged in Xianghe, Kunming, and Longfengshan during 1995—1996, but the recover trend in Waliguan doesn't occur until 2001. The inter comparisons also reveal the quality information of ground based total ozone observations. For example, due to Brewer grating scratches in 2000—2006, total ozone observation from Longfengshan intends to be lower at high SZA conditions, which has been reflected in the RDs sensitivity validation to SZA. The increasing total ozone difference between Dobson#075 and OMI or SCIAMACHY products since 2007 needs further investigation.
  • Fig. 1  Historical calibratio n record of Brewer #054 & #076 during 1991-2008

    Fig. 2  The monthly average of total ozone relative differences between ground and space-based observ ations

    Fig. 3  The sensitivity tests of total ozone relative diffe rences between ground and space-based observ ations to solar zenith angle

    Fig. 4  The sensitivity tests of total ozone relative differences between ground and space-based observ ations to total ozone reference

    Fig. 5  The total ozone trends since 1978 from 3 kinds data sets:ground-based, TOMS and integ rated of ground-based and TOMS observations

    Table  1  Total O3 comparisons between ground-based and space observations

    Table  2  Normal distribution test for the relative differrences of total ozone between space and ground-based observations

    Table  3  The parameters of linear fitting between total ozone of satellite and ground-based observations

  • [1]
    Staehelin J, Kerr J, Evans R, et al.Comparison of Total Ozone Measurements of Dobson and Brewer Spectrophotomters and Recommended Transfer Functions.GAW/WM0 Report Series, NO.149, WMO/TD-No.1214, Geneva:WMO, 2003.
    [2]
    Vanicek K.Differences between ground Dobson, Brewer and satellite TOMS-8, GOME-WFDOAS total ozone observations at Hradec Kralove, Czech.Atmos Chem Phys, 2006, 6:5163-5171.
    [3]
    Fioletov V, Kerr J, Hare E, et al.An assessment of the world ground-based total ozone network performance from the comparison with satellite data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104 :1737-1748, doi: 10.1029/1998JD100046.
    [4]
    Bramstedt K, Gleason J, Loyola D, et al.Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996-2000.Atmos Chem Phys, 2002, 2 :1131-1157. doi:  10.5194/acpd-2-1131-2002
    [5]
    魏鼎文, 赵廷亮, 秦芳, 等.中国北京和昆明地区大气臭氧层异常变化.科学通报, 1994, 39(16):1509-1511. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199416019.htm
    [6]
    郑向东.云对中国区域卫星观测臭氧总量精度影响的检验分析.大气科学, 2008, 32(6):1431-1444. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXK200806018.htm
    [7]
    张毅平, 周秀骥, 薛庆瑜.Brewer光谱仪遥感大气臭氧垂直廓线的研究.应用气象学报, 1994, 5(4):444-453. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19940467&flag=1
    [8]
    郑向东, 汤洁, 李维亮, 等.拉萨地区1998年夏季臭氧总量及垂直廓线的观测研究.应用气象学报, 2000, 11(2):173-179. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000226&flag=1
    [9]
    Bhartia P K, Wellemeyer C.TOMS Version 8 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, http:∥toms.gsfc.nasa.gov, 2004 :11-24.
    [10]
    Labow G J, McPeters R D, Bhartia P K.A comparison of TOMS & SBUV Version 8 Total Column Ozone Data With Data from Ground Stations.University of Athens, 2004 :123-124.
    [11]
    Valks P, Veefkind J P, de Haan J F, et al.TOGOMI Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document, TOGOMI/ KNMI/ATBD/001, 2003.
    [12]
    Veefkind J P, de Haan J F, Brinksma E J, et al.Total ozone from the ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) using the DOAS technique.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(5):1239-1244.
    [13]
    Allen D R, Reck R A.Daily variations in TOMS total ozone date, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1996, 102(12):13603-13608.
    [14]
    任芝花, 冯明农, 张洪政, 等.自动与人工观测降雨量的差异及相关性.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3):358-364. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20070358&flag=1
    [15]
    McPeters R D, Labow G J.An assessment of the accuracy of 14.5 years of Nimbus 7 TOMS Version 7 ozone data by comparison with the Dobson network.Geophysical Research Letters, 1996, 23 :3695-3698. doi:  10.1029/96GL03539
    [16]
    Lambert J C, Roozendael M V, Simon P C, et al.Combined characterization of GoME and TOMS total ozone measurements from space using ground-based observations from the NDSC.Advances in Space Research, 2000, 26 :1931-1940. doi:  10.1016/S0273-1177(00)00178-2
    [17]
    Meghan L M, Rao S T, Zurbenko l G.Evaluating the effectiveness of ozone management effort in the presence of meteorological variability.Journal of the Air And Waste Management Association, 1998, 48 :201-215. doi:  10.1080/10473289.1998.10463673
    [18]
    Eskridge R E, Ku J Y, Rao S T, et al.Separating different scales of motion in time series of meteorological variables.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1997, 78(7):1473-1483. doi:  10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1473:SDSOMI>2.0.CO;2
    [19]
    Casale G R, Meloni D, Miano S, et al.Solar UV-B irradiance and total ozone in Italy:Fluctuations and trends.Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(D4):4895-4901. doi:  10.1029/1999JD900303
    [20]
    Reinsel G C, Miller A J, et al.Weatherhead E C, Trend analysis of total ozone data for turnaround and dynamicalcontributions, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110, D16306, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004662
    [21]
    Kerr J B.New methodology for deriving total ozone and other atmospheric variables from Brewer spectrophotometer direct sun spectra.Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, 107(D23), 4731, doi: 1029/2001JD001227.
    [22]
    Ken Lamb, China Brewer # 076 Calibrations Report in 2002, 2004 and 2006, http:∥www.ios.ca, 2009.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (4331) PDF downloads(2454) Cited by()
    • Received : 2009-05-14
    • Accepted : 2009-12-15
    • Published : 2010-02-28

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint