Zhang Lejian, Cheng Minghu, Tao Lan. Bright band identification from CINRAD-SA/SB. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(2): 171-179.
Citation: Zhang Lejian, Cheng Minghu, Tao Lan. Bright band identification from CINRAD-SA/SB. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(2): 171-179.

Bright Band Identification from CINRAD-SA/SB

  • Received Date: 2009-04-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2010-02-04
  • Publish Date: 2010-04-30
  • The bright band caused by aggregated snow melting has increased the uncertainties in radar based quantitative precipitation estimation. However, the height of the bright band can indicate the 0℃ isotherm and can be useful in identifying areas of potential icing for aviation and in the data assimilation for numerical weather predictions. Furthermore, the region of the bright band can also indicate the region of transition from convective to stratiform cloud which is useful for meso scale weather analysis. Based on extensive analysis, an automated method to identify bright band with CINRAD SA/SB Doppler radar based on vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR) and 3 dimension characteristics (horizontal, reflectivity gradient and vertical reflectivity lapse) of radar (3DVPR BBID) is developed. The 3DVPR BBID algorithm can determine from a volume scan mean VPR and a background freezing level height from soundings if a bright band exists. To evaluate the performance of the 3DVPR BBID, radar data from 22 June to 11 July 2003 and from 1 to 31 July 2007 in Hefei and from 1 to 30 June 2008 in Guangzhou are utilized, and a method which identifies bright band based only on VPR is also implemented for comparison. The results show that 3DVPR BBID can identify the existence of bright band exactly and give the height of 0℃ isotherm. The accuracy rate for VPR of bright band with 3DVPR BBID is higher than that with VPR BBID. The probabilities of identification between VPR BBID and 3DVPR BBID are 94.0% and 95.7% from 22 June to 11 July 2003 separately, 85.4% and 92.3% in July 2007, 81.0% and 89.8% in June 2008. The height of 0℃ isotherm derived from 3DVPR BBID and VPR BBID are close to the sounding observation. Furthermore, the performance of 3DVPR BBID is better than VPR BBID. In most cases, the evaluation of 3DVPR BBID is better than VPR BBID based on mean absolute error (MAE) of different distance from radar. Since the time interval of soundings is longer, the algorithm can give higher time resolution data of the 0℃ isotherm. When calculating the height of bright band with radar data, it's estimated that radar wave transmits with the standard atmosphere refraction. Another limitation is that VPR can only be used in certain parts of the radar detected regions. And there are some uncertainties with VPR in the distance far away from radar.
  • Fig. 1  The bright band model of vertical profile of reflectivity

    Fig. 2  The image of Heifei radar reflectivity at the height of 3 km at 07:03 8 July 2007 (a), the precipitation type field (b) and the VPR of convective precipitation (c)

    (the CON, BB and STR represent the convective precipitation, bright band and stratiform precipitation)

    Fig. 3  The image of Guangzhou radar reflectivity at the height of 3 km at 08:03 6 June 2008 (a), the precipitation type tield (b) and the VPR of bright band (c) (the others same as in Fig. 2)

    Fig. 4  The image of Guangzhou radar reflectivity at the height of 3 km at 20:01 13 June 2008 (a), the precipitation type field (b), the VPR of convective precipitation (c) and bright band (d)(the others same as in Fig. 2)

    Fig. 5  The image of Guangzhou radar reflectivity at the height of 3 km at 11: 54 25 June 2008 (a), the precipitation type field (b), the VPR of convective precipitation (c) and bright band (d)(the others same as in Fig. 2)

    Fig. 6  The image of the precipitation type field at the height of 3 km at 11; 54 25 June 2008 (a), the VPR of convective precipitation (b) and bright band (c) (the others same as in Fig. 2)

    Fig. 7  The height of 0℃ isotherm derived from observation, VPR-BBID and 3DVPR-BBID (a) Heifti radar from 22 June to 11 July 2003, (b) Heifti radar from 1 to 31 July 2007, (c) Guangzhou radar from 1 to 30 June 2008

    Fig. 8  The mean absolute error of different distance from radar (a) Heiffi radar from 22 June to 11 July 2003, (b) Heiffi radar from 1 to 31 July 2007, (c) Guangzhou radar from 1 to 30 June 2008

  • [1]
    Zhang J,Langston C,Howard K,Bright band identification based on vertical profiles of reflectivity from the WSR-88D,Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2008,25:1859-1872. doi:  10.1175/2008JTECHA1039.1
    [2]
    张培昌,杜秉玉,戴铁丕.雷达气象学.北京:气象出版社,2001:177-217.
    [3]
    Austin P M,Bermis A C,A quantitative study of the"bright band"in radar precipitation echoes,Journal of Meteorology,1950,1950:145-151.
    [4]
    Vignal B,Kraiewski W F,Large-sample evaluation of two meth-ods to correct range-dependent error for WSR-88D rainfall esti-mates,Journal of Hydrometeorology,2001,2:490-504. doi:  10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0490:LSEOTM>2.0.CO;2
    [5]
    Vignal B,Galli G,Joss J,Three methods to determine pro-files of reflectivity from volumetric radar data to correct pre-cipitation estimates,Journal of Applied Meteorology,2000,29:1715-1726.
    [6]
    Fabry F,Zawadzki I,Long-term radar observations of the melt-ing layer of measurements above the Alps to the ground level,Journal of Applied Meteorology,1995,41:542-557.
    [7]
    Sanchez-Diezma R,Zawadzki I,Sempere-Torres D,Identifi-cation of the bright band through the analysis of volumetric radar data,Journal of Geophysical Research,2000,105:2225-2236. doi:  10.1029/1999JD900310
    [8]
    Gourley J J,Calvert C M,Automated detection of the bright band using WSR-88D radar data,Weather and Forecasting,2003,18:585-599. doi:  10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0585:ADOTBB>2.0.CO;2
    [9]
    曹俊武,刘黎平,陈晓辉,等.3836C波段双线偏振多普勒雷达及其在一次降水过程中的应用研究.应用气象学报,2006,17(2):192-200. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060233&flag=1
    [10]
    陈明轩,高峰.利用一种自动识别算法移除天气雷达反射率因子的亮带.应用气象学报,2006,17(2):207-214. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060235&flag=1
    [11]
    朱乾根,林锦瑞,寿绍文,等.天气学原理和方法.北京:气象出版社,2003:600-607.
    [12]
    张沛源,周海光,胡绍萍.双多普勒天气雷达风场探测的可靠性研究.应用气象学报,2002,13(4):485-496. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020464&flag=1
    [13]
    万玉发,杨洪平,肖艳娇,等.多普勒天气雷达站址视程的客观分析技术.应用气象学报,2000,11(4):440-447. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20000465&flag=1
    [14]
    吴翠红,万玉发,吴涛,等.雷达回波垂直廓线及其生成方法.应用气象学报,2006,17(2):232-239. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060239&flag=1
    [15]
    Andrieu H,Creutin J D,Identification of vertical profiles of radar reflectivity for hydrological applications using an inverse method.Part I:Formulation,Journal of Applied Meteorology,1995,34:225-239.
    [16]
    Biggerstaff M I,Listemaa A,An improved scheme for con-veetive/stratiform echo classification using radar reflectivity,Journal of Applied Meteorology,2000,39:2129-2150. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2129:AISFCS>2.0.CO;2
    [17]
    胡胜,顾松山,庄旭东,等.风暴的多普勒雷达自动识别.气象学报,2006,64(6):796-808. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB200606011.htm
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(8)

    Article views (3930) PDF downloads(2073) Cited by()
    • Received : 2009-04-15
    • Accepted : 2010-02-04
    • Published : 2010-04-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint