Tang Jie, Yu Xiangming, Cheng Hongbing, et al. The cause of pH measurement negative bias in acid rain monitoring. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(4): 458-463.
Citation: Tang Jie, Yu Xiangming, Cheng Hongbing, et al. The cause of pH measurement negative bias in acid rain monitoring. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(4): 458-463.

The Cause of pH Measurement Negative Bias in Acid Rain Monitoring

  • Received Date: 2009-06-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2010-05-17
  • Publish Date: 2010-08-31
  • Precipitation pH and conductivity are measured routinely in a nation wide network with more than 300 stations known as Acid Rain Monitoring Network (ARMN), under the infrastructure of China Meteorological Administration (CMA) since early 1990s. Recent reports indicate that a small part of precipitation pH data in the historic ARMN CMA dataset may suffered negative bias, upmost to-0.3 pH unit, when meticulous statistical method being applied in the data quality evaluation. To seek a better understanding on the causes of this negative bias, a field investigation is designed and conducted to track the performance of pH electrode at site by using the method of routine measurement of target samples. Two target samples prepared by the central lab in Beijing, with pH value of 4.8 and 6.5, are measured at two dozen of selected CMA ARMN stations once every ten days. At one of the selected stations, obvious negative bias in pH measurement appears after a new pH electrode being put into use for only 3 months. The magnitude of the negative bias produced by this short lived electrode is relatively steady in following 6 months, which ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 pH unit and is similar with that found in the historic pH dataset of ARMN CMA. As the regulated usage period for a pH electrode in ARMN CMA is 12 months, the lack of on site pH electrode examining/testing method at ARMN CMA stations may result in using a short lived electrode unwittingly in the routine precipitation pH measurement. Hence, the aging of pH electrode is considered as the most likely cause for the negative bias found in the historic pH dataset of ARMN CMA. Further test for the found aged pH electrode, by using a group of prepared solutions with different pH values and conductivities, shows that the negative bias of aged pH electrode is not only affected by ion strength of the solution, but also by the acidity of the solution. The aged pH electrode tends to give larger negative bias in the solution of lower ion strength. Also, the negative bias given by the aged pH electrode is correlated to the pH value of the solution. For the solution with conductivity in range of 30—70 μS·cm-1, the slope of the negative bias to the pH value of the solution is about 0.08, which tends to be smaller for the solutions of higher ion strength. Based on the results of the field investigation and the laboratory test, target sample measurement is suggested as an on site quality control method for pH measurement at stations.
  • Fig. 1  The departures from the reference value of pH blind sample measurement results (dots (•) stand for the averages, horizontal bar (━) for the medians; rectangles for the ranges between 25% percentiles and 75% percentiles, and vertical lines for the ranges between 5% percentiles and 95% percentiles of the departures from the reference value)

    Fig. 2  Statistics of the pH measurement results at stations in the field investigation (the open squares (□) stand for the averages, vertical line for the range of±2σ, horizontal lines for the group averages)

    Fig. 3  pH measurement results of target samples at aselected station

    (circles (○) stand for the results of first electrode, and diamond (◆) for the result of second electrode)

    Fig. 4  The relationship of pH measurement bias to the ion strength of the target samples

    Fig. 5  The relationship of pH measurement bias to the pH values of the target samples

  • [1]
    中国气象科学研究院大气成分观测与服务中心. 2008年中国区域酸雨年报. 2009.
    [2]
    中国气象局.酸雨观测业务规范.北京:气象出版社, 2005.
    [3]
    丁国安, 徐晓斌, 王淑凤, 等.中国气象局酸雨网基本资料数据集及初步分析.应用气象学报, 2004, 15(增刊):85-94.
    [4]
    汤洁, 徐晓斌, 巴金, 等.近年来京津地区酸雨形势变化的特点分析---气溶胶影响的探讨.中国科学院研究生院学报, 2007, 24(5):667-673. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKYB200705018.htm
    [5]
    巴金, 汤洁, 王淑凤, 等.重庆地区近十年酸雨时空分布和季节变化特征分析.气象, 2007, 34(9):81-88. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200809012.htm
    [6]
    汤洁, 徐晓斌, 巴金, 等.电导率加和性质及其在酸雨观测数据质量评估中的应用.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(4):1-8. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080401&flag=1
    [7]
    汤洁, 程红兵, 于晓岚, 等.全国酸雨观测网未知水样考核结果的统计分析.气象, 2007, 33(12):75-83. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXX200712012.htm
    [8]
    WMO.Manual for the GAW Precipitation Chemistry Programme (Guideline, Data Quality Objectives and Standard Operating Pro-cedures).WMO TD-No.1251, 2004.
    [9]
    国家环境保护局.GB/T6920-86水质pH值的测定玻璃电极法.北京:环境出版社, 1987.
    [10]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T19117-2003《酸雨观测规范》.北京:中国标准出版社, 2003.
    [11]
    叶宪曾, 张新祥.仪器分析教程.北京:北京大学出版社, 2007.
    [12]
    方原柏.pH计的在线自诊断.软件, 2009(04):54-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RJZZ200904022.htm
    [13]
    林国元, 江劲军, 朱继承, 等.pH玻璃电极对比观测误差研究.福建地震, 2007, 23(3-4):32-34.
    [14]
    董胜敏, 王承遇, 潘玉昆.pH玻璃电极的现n与发展.玻璃与搪瓷, 2004, 32(2):53-58.
    [15]
    Barron J John, Ashton Colin, Geary Leo.Care, Maintenance and Fault Diagnosis for pH Electrodes.http:∥www.z-lab.org/pHmetercareandfeeding.pdf.2009-04-28.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article views (4040) PDF downloads(1621) Cited by()
    • Received : 2009-06-30
    • Accepted : 2010-05-17
    • Published : 2010-08-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint