Liu Xiangwen, Li Weijing, Wu Tongwen, et al. The assimilation results of ocean temperature and salinity data from GTS in BCC_GODAS 2.0. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(5): 558-569.
Citation: Liu Xiangwen, Li Weijing, Wu Tongwen, et al. The assimilation results of ocean temperature and salinity data from GTS in BCC_GODAS 2.0. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2010, 21(5): 558-569.

The Assimilation Results of Ocean Temperature and Salinity Data from GTS in BCC_GODAS 2.0

  • Received Date: 2009-08-11
  • Rev Recd Date: 2010-07-02
  • Publish Date: 2010-10-31
  • Ocean temperature and salinity observations data from GTS (Global Telecommunication System) are assimilated in second generation global ocean data assimilation system of Beijing Climate Center (BCC_GODAS 2.0) and the results are analyzed. First, the comparison with SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation) reveals the vertical distribution features of root mean square error (RMSE) of global temperature and salinity in model and assimilation system. The analysis shows that, for the RMSE of temperature with assimilation, compared with the results without assimilation, it has a slight decline with a range of 0—0.3 ℃ in the sea surface layer, and an obvious descent with a range of 0.1—0.7 ℃ in depth from about 100 m to deep layer, but has no obvious variation in depth from the middle and lower mixed layer to about 100 m. For the RMSE of salinity after assimilation, it has a descent with a range of 0—0.2 psu in depth from ocean surface to deep layer. Second, further comparison is made for some vertical cross sections, including the zonal cross section along equator, the meridional cross section along 165°E in Pacific Ocean, the meridional cross section along 30°W in Atlantic Ocean, the longitudinal cross section along 90°E in Indian Ocean. The results show that, generally speaking, the GTS data assimilation improves the temperature and salinity simulation in many aspects including the extension and central intensity of warm sector in mixed layer, the depth of temperature ridge and trough in thermocline, the temperature gradient near thermocline, the extension and central intensity of high and low salinity sector, and so on. Moreover, the further comparison with some ARGO (Array for Real time Geostrophic Oceanography) observation indicates that, in most cases, the RMSE of temperature and salinity profiles has an obvious descent after assimilation, leading to more accurate vertical distribution features of temperature and salinity simulations. For selected single point profiles in different ocean areas in January, after assimilation, the RMSE of temperature and salinity decrease by 0.49 ℃ and 0.19 psu, respectively; for selected profiles in July, the descent of RMSE of temperature and salinity is 0.87 ℃ and 0.18 psu, respectively. The comparison with TAO (Tropical Atmosphere Ocean) data also shows that the assimilation can improve the temperature and salinity features to a certain extent. The BCC_GODAS 2.0 has superiority in some degree in ocean data assimilation, however, there is still some deficiency, and the assimilation effect is not very good in some areas or periods, which may be induced by lack of observations, uncertainties of the data, the imperfection of assimilation system, as well as the simulation capability of model, and so on.
  • Fig. 1  The profiles of 6-year averaged global temperature and salinity RMSE during 2002—2007 (solid line: assimilated by BCC_GODAS; dashed line:simulated by MOM4)

    Fig. 2  The depth-zone cross section of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields along equator in July during 2002—2007

    Fig. 3  The depth-meridian cross section of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields along 165°E in July during 2002—2007

    Fig. 4  The same as in Fig. 3, but for the section along 90°E

    Fig. 5  The same as in Fig. 3, but for the section along 30°W

    Fig. 6  The comparison of temperature and salinity profiles among model results (MOM4), assimilation results (BCC_GODAS), and ARGO observations in January and July of 2007

    Fig. 7  The comparison of temperature (unit:℃) and salinity (unit:psu) fields among MOM4, BCC_GODAS and TAO from January 2002 to December 2007

    Table  1  The RMSE of some temperature and salinity profiles in model and assimilation results

  • [1]
    刘益民, 李维京, 张培群. 国家气候中心全球海洋资料四维同化系统及其在热带太平洋的初步化结果分析. 海洋学报, 2005, 27(1):27-35. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEAC200501003.htm
    [2]
    Liu Yimin, Zhang Renhe, Yin Yonghong, etal. The applica-tion of ARGO data to the global ocean data assimilation oper-ational system of NCC. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2005, 29(3):355-365.
    [3]
    张人禾, 殷永红, 李清泉, 等. 利用ARGO 资料改进ENSO和我国夏季降水气候预测. 应用气象学报, 2006, 17(5):538-547. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20060593&flag=1
    [4]
    张莉, 丁一汇. 全球海气耦合模式对我国极端强降水模拟检验. 应用气象学报, 2008, 19(6):760-769. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080616&flag=1
    [5]
    杨萍, 刘伟东, 王启光, 等. 近40年我国极端温度变化趋势和季节特征. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21(1):29-36. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20100104&flag=1
    [6]
    Zhu J, Zhou G Q, Yan C X, etal. A three-dimen sional vari-ational ocean data assimilation system:Scheme and prelimi-nary results. Science in China(SeriesD), 2006, 49(12):1212-1222.
    [7]
    Xiao Xianjun, Wang Dongxiao, Yan Changxiang, etal. E-valuation of a 3DVAR system for the South China Sea. Pro-gressin Natural Science, 2008, 18(5):547-554. doi:  10.1016/j.pnsc.2007.12.007
    [8]
    朱江, 周广庆, 闫长香, 等. 一个三维变分海洋资料同化系统的设计和初步应用. 中国科学(D 辑), 2007, 37(2):261-271. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200702013.htm
    [9]
    肖贤俊, 王东晓, 闫长香, 等. 南海三维变分海洋同化模式及其验证. 自然科学进展, 2007, 17(3):353-361. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKJZ200703010.htm
    [10]
    Hayden C M, Purser R J. Three-dimensional Recursive Filter Objective Analysis of Meteorologcial Fields ∥ Preprint, Eighth Conf on Numerical Weather Prediction. Baltimore, MD, Amer Meteor Soc, 1988:185-190.
    [11]
    Hayden C M, Purser R J. Recursive filter objective analysis of meteorological field: Applicationto NESDIS operational processing. J Appl Meteor, 1995, 34:3-15. doi:  10.1175/1520-0450-34.1.3
    [12]
    Troccoli A, Haines K. Use of temperature-salinity relation in a data assimilation context. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1999, 16(12):2011-2025. doi:  10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<2011:UOTTSR>2.0.CO;2
    [13]
    Yan C, Zhu J, Li R, etal. Roles of vertical correlations of background error and T-Srelations in estimation of tempera-ture and salinity profiles from sea surface dynamic height. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: C08010, doi: 10. 1029/2003JC002224.
    [14]
    Zhu J, Yan C X. Nonlinear balance constraints in 3DVAR data assimilation. Science in China(SeriesD), 2006, 49(3):331-336. doi:  10.1007/s11430-006-0331-7
    [15]
    Nocedal J. Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Math Comput, 1980, 35:773-782. doi:  10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572855-7
    [16]
    Fujii Y, Kamachi M. Nonlinear preconditioned descentmeth-ods without inversion of a first-guess covariational analyses. Tellus (Series A), 2003, 55:522-543.
    [17]
    Carton J, Giese B. Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA)reanalysis effort. CLIVER Workshop on Ocean Reanalysis. 2004.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(7)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (3611) PDF downloads(1336) Cited by()
    • Received : 2009-08-11
    • Accepted : 2010-07-02
    • Published : 2010-10-31

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint