Ma Ying, Yao Wen, Huang Bingxun. Comparison of temperature and geopotential height records between L-band and RS90/92 radiosonde systems using first-guess field. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2011, 22(3): 336-345.
Citation: Ma Ying, Yao Wen, Huang Bingxun. Comparison of temperature and geopotential height records between L-band and RS90/92 radiosonde systems using first-guess field. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2011, 22(3): 336-345.

Comparison of Temperature and Geopotential Height Records Between L-band and RS90/92 Radiosonde Systems Using First-guess Field

  • Received Date: 2010-09-20
  • Rev Recd Date: 2011-03-08
  • Publish Date: 2011-06-30
  • The first-guess field (FG) has been used to assess the quality of sounding observation data in operation work for many years. A long term data analysis shows that the mean differences of temperature and geopotential height records between observations and FG at those neighboring stations using the same type of radiosondes are very small, while the differences for those neighboring stations using different types of radiosondes are significant. It can be inferred that FG can reflect the regional differences of meteorological elements caused by the synoptic situation. So it is feasible to compare neighboring stations records by using FG as a relative reference, which can eliminate the regional synoptic situation differences. Undoubtedly, such comparison should be applied in small region (i.e., between neighboring stations) by using synchronous observation records, and only sufficient (long term) sampling data has statistical representation.Hongkong sounding station has used the RS90/RS92 radiosonde manufactured by Vaisala since 2005. And during 2007—2009, the L-band radiosondes are used at several stations nearby Hongkong, such as Wuzhou, Shantou, Dongyuan and Yangjiang. So 5 stations above are appropriate for indirect comparison of L-band and RS92 radiosondes by using FG. It shows that there exist significant systematic differences between L-band and RS92 radiosonde systems, for both the temperature records and geopotential height records at each standard pressure level, through the two-year statistical comparison.At 19:00, the mean differences of temperature and geopotential height records are very small in the troposphere. In the stratosphere, the temperature measured by L-band radiosonde is lower than that measured by RS92, and the difference increases with height, reaching over 1℃ at 20 hPa height. The increasing temperature difference with height brings on an increasing geopotential height difference, which is over 30 gpm at 20 hPa height.At 07:00, the temperature measured by L-band is higher than that measured by RS92, which leads to a higher geopotential value. The temperature difference reaches 0.4℃ in the middle and upper troposphere, and the geopotential height difference is over 20 gpm at 100 hPa height. In the stratosphere, although the temperature measured by L-band is lower than that measured by RS92, and the difference also increases with the increase of height, the cumulative difference of temperature at 07:00 is less than that at 19:00. So the geopotential height difference between L-band and RS92 records is only about 10 gpm at 20 hPa height at 07:00.The long term direct comparison between different types of radiosondes is difficult to be carried out because of the high cost. Indirect comparison by using FG is not only economical but can reflect the real difference of operational records, so it is well worth to be widely applied.
  • Fig. 1  Mean differences of temperature and geopotential height records between Shaowu and Fuzhou from 2005 to 2008

    Fig. 2  Mean differences of temperature and geopotential height between observations and first-guess field at five stations from 2007 to 2009 (a)07:00, (b)19:00

    Fig. 3  Mean differences of temperature and geopotential height between observations and first-guess field at five stations from 2008 to 2009 (a)07:00, (b)19:00

    Fig. 4  Indirect comparison results between L-band and RS92 radiosondes from 2008 to 2009

    Fig. 5  The vertical temperature profiles of Hongkong in winter and summer

    Fig. 6  Indirect comparison results in different seasons between L-band and RS92 radiosondes (a)07:00, (b)19:00

    Fig. 7  Indirect comparison results in different seasons between L-band (Yangjiang and Wuzhou stations) and RS92 radiosondes at 07:00 from 2006 to 2008

    Fig. 8  Annual indirect comparison results between L-band and RS90/92 radiosondes (a)07:00, (b)19:00

    Fig. 9  Annual indirect comparison results between L-band and RS90/92 radiosondes at 07:00 in summer

  • [1]
    WMO. Guide To Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (7th Edition). Geneva: WMO/TD-No.8, 2006.
    [2]
    Ivanov A, Kats A, Kurnosenko S, et al. WMO International Radiosondes Comparison. Phase 3, Final Report, Geneva: WMO/TD-No.451, 1991.
    [3]
    Bower C. Global Climate Observing System Overlapping Radiosonde Test Flight Series-Climate Continuity Data Requirments. CIMO/OPAG-UPPER-AIR/ET-UASI-3/IOC-3/Doc4(1), 2008.
    [4]
    马颖, 姚雯, 黄炳勋.59型探空仪与L波段电子探空仪温度和位势高度记录直接对比分析.应用气象学报, 2010, 21(2):214-220. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20100211&flag=1
    [5]
    姚雯, 马颖, 黄炳勋, 等.利用GPS定位资料分析L波段雷达测风性能.应用气象学报, 2009, 20(2): 195-202. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20090209&flag=1
    [6]
    张立功, 陈志斌, 王勇, 等. L波段雷达-电子探空仪系统对比观测分析.气象科技, 2007, 35(1): 123-125. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXKJ200701027.htm
    [7]
    姚雯, 马颖, 徐文静.L波段电子探空仪相对湿度误差研究及其应用.应用气象学报, 2008, 19(3): 356-361. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080358&flag=1
    [8]
    李伟, 李书严, 陶士伟, 等. L波段高空气象探测系统性能评估.仪器仪表学报, 2008, 29(4): 732-735. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-YQYB200806003189.htm
    [9]
    Nash J, Smout R, Oakley T, et al. WMO Intercomparison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems. Geneva: WMO-TD No.1303, 2005.
    [10]
    Bottger H. ECMWF Monitoring System. Radiosonde Data Quality and Mornitoring ECMWF/WMO Workshop, 1987:227-238.
    [11]
    Rutherford A M. ECWMF Radiosonde Monitoring Results. Radiosonde Data Quality and Mornitoring ECMWF/WMO Workshop, 1987:95-114.
    [12]
    Hollingsworth A. Identification of Forecast and Observation Bias. Radiosonde Data Quality and Mornitoring ECMWF/WMO Workshop, 1987: 79-80.
    [13]
    陶士伟, 张跃堂, 陈卫红, 等.全球观测资料质量监视评估.气象, 2006, 32(6):53-58. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2006.06.009
    [14]
    陶士伟, 陈晓红, 龚建东. L波段探空仪温度资料误差分析.气象, 2006, 32(10):46-51. doi:  10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2006.10.007
    [15]
    黄炳勋, 郭亚田, 陶士伟, 等. L波段雷达-电子探空仪系统探空资料质量初析//中国气象学会2003年年会论文集, 2003: 158-162.
  • 加载中
  • -->

Catalog

    Figures(9)

    Article views (3257) PDF downloads(1401) Cited by()
    • Received : 2010-09-20
    • Accepted : 2011-03-08
    • Published : 2011-06-30

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint