谐波系数 | a0 | a1 | b1 | a2 | b2 | a3 | b3 | a4 | b4 | 均方根误差/(m·s-1) |
二阶 | -0.8 | 8.3 | 2.3 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 2.19 | ||||
三阶 | -1.6 | 7.2 | 0.9 | -2.0 | 0.6 | -0.3 | 2.2 | 1.92 | ||
四阶 | -5.2* | 0.6* | 0.3* | -3.1 | 5.6* | 2.7* | 3.1 | 0.5 | -1.5 | 1.87 |
注:*表示拟合系数明显与实际联系的物理量大小不符。 |
Citation: | Ma Xiumei, Lee Wenchau, Zhao Kun, et al. Optimization of nonlinear VAD method in the low-level wind retrieval. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2014, 25(3): 321-329. |
Fig. 2 The vertical wind profile retrieved by nonlinear VAD of S-Pol radar from 0000 UTC to 2352 UTC on 2 June 2008(a) without considering data absence, the order in z is 3, (b) considering data absence, the order in z is 3, (c) considering data absence, the order in z is 2
(* indicates the VCP1 scan mode, the others are VCP2 scan mode)
Table 1 The Fourier coefficients and the aprroximation error for the VAD with the different numer of harmonics
谐波系数 | a0 | a1 | b1 | a2 | b2 | a3 | b3 | a4 | b4 | 均方根误差/(m·s-1) |
二阶 | -0.8 | 8.3 | 2.3 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 2.19 | ||||
三阶 | -1.6 | 7.2 | 0.9 | -2.0 | 0.6 | -0.3 | 2.2 | 1.92 | ||
四阶 | -5.2* | 0.6* | 0.3* | -3.1 | 5.6* | 2.7* | 3.1 | 0.5 | -1.5 | 1.87 |
注:*表示拟合系数明显与实际联系的物理量大小不符。 |
Table 2 Nonlinear VAD coefficients for u and v with elevation of 0.5° and 1.5° at 0000 UTC 2 June 2008
系数 | 1 | z | z2 | z3 | r2 | r2z | 均方根误差/(m·s-1) |
二阶u | -2.2 | 11.6 | -11.5 | -0.001 | 0.004 | 1.32 | |
二阶v | 0.4 | -1.5 | 3.3 | 0.0006 | -0.001 | 1.12 | |
三阶u | -2.6 | 13.4 | -24.2 | 44.0 | 0.006 | -0.024 | 1.31 |
三阶v | 0.09 | 0.09 | -7.7 | 38.1 | 0.007 | -0.026 | 1.11 |
[1] |
Lhermitte R M, Atlas D.Precipitation Motion by Pulse Doppler.Preprints Ninth Weather Radar Conf, Amer Meteor Soc, 1961:218-223.
|
[2] |
Browning K A, Wexler R.The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar.J Appl Meteor, 1968, 7:105-113. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0105:TDOKPO>2.0.CO;2
|
[3] |
陶祖钰.关于Doppler雷达VAD技术的讨论.应用气象学报, 1995, 6(1):109-113. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19950116&flag=1
|
[4] |
刘淑媛, 陶祖钰.从单多普勒雷达速度场反演散度场.应用气象学报, 1999, 10(1):41-48. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990143&flag=1
|
[5] |
Srivastava R C, Matejka T J, Lorello T J.Doppler radar study of the trailing anvil region associated with a squall line.J Atmos Sci, 1986, 43:356-377. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0356:DRSOTT>2.0.CO;2
|
[6] |
陶玥, 汤达章, 肖稳安, 等.改善EVAD技术求解散度的方法.应用气象学报, 2005, 16(2):205-212. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20050225
|
[7] |
Tabary P, Scialom G, Germann U.Real-time retrieval of the wind from aliased velocities measured by Doppler radars.J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2001, 18:875-882. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0875:RTROTW>2.0.CO;2
|
[8] |
Gao J, Droegemeier K K, Gong J, et al.A method for retrieving mean horizontal wind profiles from single-Doppler radar observations contaminated by aliasing.Mon Wea Rev, 2004, 132:1399-1409. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493-132.1.1399
|
[9] |
邵爱梅, 乔小湜, 邱崇践.VAD技术反演水平风廓线的质量控制标准.兰州大学学报, 2009, 45:57-62. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0455-2059.2009.05.011
|
[10] |
邓勇, 尹丽云, 许迎杰, 等.多普勒雷达速度场缺测区域填补技术的数值模拟.气象, 2010, 36(5):1-12. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2010.05.001
|
[11] |
尹丽云, 许迎杰, 邓勇, 等.VAD迭代法对多普勒雷达风场缺测区数据填补的应用研究.云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 33(增刊Ⅱ):359-366. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNDZ2011S2092.htm
|
[12] |
Caya D, Zawadzki I.VAD analysis of nolinear wind fields.J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1992, 9:575-587. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1992)009<0575:VAONWF>2.0.CO;2
|
[13] |
万蓉, 汤达章.非线性风场的VAD分析初探.气象科学, 2003, 23(3):314-323. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10300-2003063896.htm
|
[14] |
陆大春, 蒋年冲.VAD有关产品在临近预报中的应用.应用气象学报, 2003, 14(2):156-160. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYQX2003S1018.htm
|
[15] |
马清云, 李泽椿, 陶士伟.单部多普勒天气雷达风场反演及其在数值预报中的应用试验.应用气象学报, 2001, 12(4):487-493. http://qikan.camscma.cn/jams/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20010463&flag=1
|
[16] |
李华宏, 薛纪善, 王曼, 等.多普勒雷达风廓线的反演及变分同化试验.应用气象学报, 2007, 18(1):50-57. doi: 10.11898/1001-7313.20070110
|